• Super Maintenance

    Xenforo Cloud upgraded our forum to XenForo version 2.3.4. This update has created styling issues to our current templates.

    Starting January 9th, site maintenance is ongoing until further notice, but please report any other issues you may experience so we can look into.

    We apologize for the inconvenience.

Best Comic-book movie of 2010?

AVEITWITHJAMON

Badass Cloud
Joined
Mar 5, 2003
Messages
41,966
Reaction score
7,267
Points
103
Well, its simple folks, we had 5 comic book movies in 2010, so vote for which one you thought was the best out of them, here is my order:

1)Kick-Ass
2)Iron Man2
-)Scott Pilgrim vs The World
4)The Losers
5)Jonah Hex

didnt see Red. Films are posted in the order they were released (in the UK at least).

EDIT: Just realised I forgot about The Losers, will get a mod to add it on.
 
Last edited:
Haven't seen loosers o J Hex, but Scott Pilgrim is my #1 movie of the year :D
 
^To be honest I dont think seeing Jonah Hex would effect your vote, its terrible, Losers was cool but not quite best of the year material.
 
1. Kick-Ass
2. Iron man 2
3. Scott Pilgrim
4. Losers
5...Can I vote kick-ass again? :o
 
Kick-Ass.

The rest don't even come close.
 
Haven't seen Losers, but I enjoyed all of them honestly. It's between Kick-Ass and Scott Pilgrim for me.
 
Ah, I just saw Iron man 2 and I didn't like it. :(
 
Scott Pilgrim by far. Followed by Losers, I actually liked it!
 
I've seen this three only.
1)Scott Pilgrim vs. the World
2)Kick-Ass.
3)Iron Man 2, eh.
 
I like kick ass but it's so immoral to show kids killing with guns in order to be or becomes superheroes
it's very dangerous thoughts
and i wonder if that little girl who shot a man in the head wasn't inpired by this .
 
1) Kick Ass or Scott Pilgrim vs The World (need to watch them again back to back)

3) Iron Man 2
4) The Losers

I haven't seen Red or Jonah Hex.
 
Many little girls have gone and shot older men in the head before, I doubt Kick-Ass will spawn a generation of little girl killers
 
All I've seen of the CBM's of 2010 was the disappointing IM2. That movie alone is why I'm happy Favreau won't be coming back for IM3. He should've left after IM1 b/c clearly he only had 1 and probably the easiest movie in IM to make the "origin" movie. Oh well.
 
Scott Pilgrim, although I wasn't too crazy about most of the casting. Cera just played typical Cera and MEW/Ramona was kind of dull.
 
All I've seen of the CBM's of 2010 was the disappointing IM2. That movie alone is why I'm happy Favreau won't be coming back for IM3. He should've left after IM1 b/c clearly he only had 1 and probably the easiest movie in IM to make the "origin" movie. Oh well.

I'm not sure what happened but I was happy with Favreau directing IM2. Maybe he was forced with all the Avengers stuff but IM2 was not the fun adventure the first was, not by far. Even the action was little and average. But I thought that maybe he would be given more freedom if he directed 3. Now I'll never know. But if every Marvel movie is going to be Avengers-oriented then I have lost my interest in anything Marvel. :csad:
 
Surprised Scott Pilgrim is winning this to be honest, it was good but not as good as KA for me, although I have only seen SP twice so that could change.
 
The action scenes were better shot and edited. You simply didn't care for any of it.

The fight at the races was great. Then nothing nothing nothing, then a weird fight with a drunk Iron Man vs his best friend (not the most exciting idea for an action scene), then nothing until the end, which was brakabrakabrakabrakabrakabrakabrakabraka explosion explosion it's over.
 
And what's with the sound design? The drone's guns had, like, no punch at all. I did not care that the civilians had plastic "bricks" poured on them. yes, I realize they use plastic bricks for all movies, but the restrained sound design killed the illusion.
 
I'm not sure what happened but I was happy with Favreau directing IM2. Maybe he was forced with all the Avengers stuff but IM2 was not the fun adventure the first was, not by far. Even the action was little and average. But I thought that maybe he would be given more freedom if he directed 3. Now I'll never know. But if every Marvel movie is going to be Avengers-oriented then I have lost my interest in anything Marvel. :csad:

Yeah, Faverau wanted 3yrs for IM2, to be able to deliver the movie he wanted to, Marvel refused and only allowed him 2, prob because they did not want it overcrowding with Cap and Thor the next year, and to keep the momentum going for Avengers.
and I agree with you about the action scenes, the grand prix scene was top quality, the rest were forgettable, Whiplash was hardly used at all in the finale, what we got from him was good, but too short.
and one thing I have never liked in superhero cartoons is when the hero fights robots, the Spider-slayers, the robots in the Secret Wars adaptation...so I was not very into the fight with the drones, if it had been choereographed well, I might have enjoyed a lot on an aesthetic level, if not dramatic, but as you say, it was just a bunch of constant shooting.

I'm not voting just yet, maybe Kick-Ass, but I have only seen SP once and gave it a 10/10, so I have to see it again, I've seen KA a few times.

edit: ok, i went for spvtw, it was more the more original movie, and i can't imagine my opinion of it will change, i don't need to see it again to know that, it was one of those film viewings that stays with you after filling you up with the goodness. KA was also v good, but in essence it was another just another sh movie, a good one though.
Haven't seen JH or TL.
 
Last edited:
^Yeah, the drone fight was cool while it lasted but it got boring pretty quick as the drones were simply no threat to IM and WM, and then the fight with Whiplash was simply blink and you'll miss it.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"