Captain Marvel came first thus Superman is the rip-off character. .
you are misinformed, superman was out first. The creators of captain marvel were told by fawcett comics to "give them a superman"
Captain Marvel came first thus Superman is the rip-off character. .
Moon Knight = Batman
Thanos = Darksied
Sentry = Superman
Ka-zar = Tarzan
Deadpool = Deathstroke
Most popular Marvel characters are reasonably original though.
Deadpool started as a parody. Is that really considered a ripoff?
id say so, the creators knew what they were doing. i read somewhere that liefeld brough deadpool to his partner and he said himself that it was straight up deathstroke
Initially i think the character was more a straight up rip off but with a more wise cracking personality.
Then they eventually turned him into a walking satire of Deathstroke and characters of his ilk.
id say so, the creators knew what they were doing. i read somewhere that liefeld brough deadpool to his partner and he said himself that it was straight up deathstroke
So here's the deal, anyone in this site that knows me knows that I am one of the biggest superman fanboys on the vine. Love him. And I feel it necessary to preface my comments with that as, after reading Paul Jenkins' "The Sentry" I must admit that Sentry is NOT even remotely a Superman ripoff aside from the "S" he wears and a few nods to the man of steel. Sentry, at least as Paul Jenkins wrote him, is his own VERY interesting and dynamic character. Not to mention this is some of the best art I've ever seen in the way of aesthetic beauty and storytelling. So yeah. We need to put an end to this myth. The way I see it Sentry is more like Plutonian than anything.....or rather Plutonian is like Sentry.
I agree. Many people only look at superficial similarities to a character,and label them "rip-offs". I've seen people say that Hawkeye was a rip-off of Green Arrow because they are both archers,that Killer Croc is a rip-off to Lizard because they are both humanoid reptiles. Sure,on the surface,you can find similarities between many characters,but once you look at them for what they truly are,they become something much more and you realize how unique and distinct they are. And HEY,some characters ARE deliberately inspired by other characters,some characters take inspiration from other characters (Superman from the Original Gladiator,Batman from The Shadow,Spider-man from The Web,Deadpool from Deathstroke,Maul from Hulk,Majestic,Apollo,Midnighter,etc),but become more and more distinctive and unique over time. Eventually,it's how I learned that Gladiator (Marvel) is so awesome. No idea is exclusive or original to another. I mean,do people call Batman a "rip-off" of The Shadow? Spider-man from The Web? No.
Once people start to actually read about the character other than looking at superficial things on the surface,they begin to truly appreciate the character. It's better to look at differences between characters,not half-assed similarities. Might as well call one hero a rip-off of another because they're both white,or that they can both fly,etc. So,put simply,I agree. Once you learn more about many characters,you begin to see how distinctive and unique they are and appreciate them. Also,as usual,SC sums it up perfectly.
Deconstruction. Sentry is a deconstruction of the Superman archetype which includes Marvelman, Captain Marvel (and others too, but Marvelman, and Captain Marvel are especially pertinent as it far as Sentry is concerned. Also like many deconstructionist works, Sentry and his story are deconstructions of the comic book medium and eras and tropes from those areas (example golden age writing, silver age writing) and this is why you get certain themes that bare similarities to other things. Empowered super pets, Watchtower's, hyperbole what have you.
Rip off is a hard term to apply as far as actual merit and exclusivity. The Rob Liefeld Smash character thats a purple Hulk? Maybe a good example off a rip off. Gladiator? Well yes his name is Kallark, combining Kal from Kal El and Clark from Clark Kent to get Kal Lark or Kallark… maybe a sign he is a rip off? Except you know, calling him Gladiator in reference to the idea Superman was inspired by Gladiator/Huge Danner? More of a comic in joke and homage. Also? Nothing wrong with a homage or imitation being quality. Or alternatively trying to say that because something is quality it can't be directly inspired by something else. Ain't no shame for a character in being inspired by another character. Ideas don't exist in bubbles. Writers and artists open their eyes and they start taking in influences that affect what they produce creatively.
this. But Gladiator's grown into something much differently than Superman. His evolution of character is rich.
I still think sentry is inspired by and not a rip off.
Rich, have a butler, a nocturnal motif, and gadgets to follow the motif.Moon Knight = Batman
Thanos = Darksied
Sentry = Superman
Ka-zar = Tarzan
Deadpool = Deathstroke
I think we first need to better define the distinction between rip-off, homage, parody, and just having a few similar traits.
As my previous post shows, I think that despite their visual similarity, in practice Thanos really isn't anything like Darkseid.