People are ignorant for bringing up Johnny Depp's name for every single villain.
I'd prefer either Crispin Glover or Tom Hardy for Black Mask. Different body types and choices, but both could work well.
Hugo Weaving did in V for Vendetta.
How about Josh Lucas?
James Purefoy
I liked him when I saw him in A Knight's Tale. Been watching his work ever since. I really want to like him as an actor, but he's just too weak. He was almost laughable as the lead in Solomon Kane (everything was laughable about that film, though).
He was terrific as Mark Antony in Rome, though.
Agreed. TV actor, though? One who's proved he doesn't have a cinema-level presence? Nah.
I think it's just more of the setting and story that they're used in. A lot of 'he/she's a TV actor's have been lucky to find the right vehicle to make that 'leap'. And Rome was about as 'cinematic' as it gets for Television. I think Baldwin even started on TV/Soaps, as I recall. And now....he's back on TV.![]()
Kind of?Baldwin's kind of an a$$hole, though, which played a part in him getting... demoted.
I think the right project with the right director could bring a lot more out of him. And we could probably think of harder roles to play than Black mask as well. But yeah, there are probably better choices out there.I agree with the whole "leap" argument, but Purefoy has had many chances and he blew it, the guy just doesn't have it in him, imo. He even left V for Vendetta (he was set to play V) because he just couldn't rise to the occasion.
about thinking out of the box... what about BENICIO DEL-TORO? also, glover is a great actor, but he's great because he's so creepy and atmospheric. i could see him as riddler, mad hatter, ratcatcher or replacing cillian murphy as scarecrow.
Really? "Slimey" was exactly what I think when I see Murphy's Jonathan Crane, especially in his first two scenes in BB. Glover is more the "I'm gonna follow you to a dark alley, smash your head