OutOfBoose
#ReleaseTheAyerCut
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2012
- Messages
- 18,162
- Reaction score
- 3,980
- Points
- 103
The technology isn't there yet, so it will be another case of uncanny valley, I fear.
They have Star Wars.But they need to hone their skills somewhere...t:
Digital copy of one of the replicants from the first film? I hope it's not true.![]()
Maybe it turns out that humans will eventually die out of some disease and Replicants will be the ones left on Earth?"a long-buried secret that has the potential to plunge what’s left of society into chaos"![]()
Quebec director Denis Villeneuve says making his upcoming "Blade Runner" sequel has been the most intense experience of his life, not just because of the challenging shoot in Budapest but also because of fan fervour."The level of expectation behind this movie is huge and everybody is waiting for the movie with open arms or with a baseball bat," he said with a laugh during an interview at the Toronto Film Critics Association Awards on Tuesday night.
"The expectations are for obvious reasons: The first movie was a masterpiece and it's a very risky, challenging project. But I will say that it has been the most rewarding and exciting experience of my life so far and I'm excited.
"I'm looking forward to sharing it with you guys."
Due out in October, "Blade Runner 2049" is directed by Villeneuve and written by Hampton Fancher and Michael Green. Ridley Scott, director of the original film, is an executive producer on the sequel.
Harrison Ford will reprise his role as Rick Deckard, a former police operative who's been missing for decades, alongside Ryan Gosling of London, Ont., who plays an L.A. police officer.
Other cast members include Robin Wright, Jared Leto and Vancouver native Mackenzie Davis.
The sequel is set 30 years after the events of the first sci-fi film from 1982 but has the same tone, said Villeneuve.
"The first movie was a film noir, quite intense with melancholia and an existential crisis, so we are not far away from the thematics of the first movie, I will say," he said.
"It's the same genre, the same atmosphere."
I'm not satisfied with it's level. Incredibly distracting. Of course there are much more important matters to worry about, but I hate these digital faces and I don't want them in movies.If it's as good as Rogue One's cgi characters I'm not worried. But if they can't meet that benchmark I'm going to be disappointed. Who is doing the vfx for this film?
I'm not satisfied with it's level. Incredibly distracting. Of course there are much more important matters to worry about, but I hate these digital faces and I don't want them in movies.
The original is one of the best movies of all time. Watch it again.
I'm not satisfied with it's level. Incredibly distracting. Of course there are much more important matters to worry about, but I hate these digital faces and I don't want them in movies.
If it's as good as Rogue One's cgi characters I'm not worried. But if they can't meet that benchmark I'm going to be disappointed. Who is doing the vfx for this film?
Even Cushing wasn't OK. As soon as he opened his mouth it was super-annoying. Leia was atrocious. The only way I can see it work - if these 3D models don't talk. If used smartly, with full understanding of limitations, it can be tolerable. But if used bluntly like in Rogue One - ugh... Way to ruin a film for me.Definitely in the same boat as you. The Peter Cushing 3D thing was ok but [BLACKOUT]Princess Leia[/BLACKOUT] at the very end was so bad. It looked like she was made from clay. The 3D works in dark shots but when any amount of bright light hits the model, it looks pretty bad.