BOUGHT/THOUGHT for Wednesday, February 14th

Thunderbolts #111: It's official, I really don't like the Thunderbolts now. I love the concept of villains trying to amend their ways and be real heroes, but this? Ugh. It's like a sick bastardization of the concept. Are we supposed to cheer when Jack Flag gets crippled? If not, then why the hell are these people the main focus of the title now? I don't want to ROOT for them at all. Ellis builds up Jack Flag as a heroic, loving man who manages to somewhat succeed against impossible odds, and in the midst of returning home to rescue his wife (Fiancee?). Bullseye cripples him with a sneak attack as the military watches.
I'm truly not sure what we're supposed to feel while reading this book. I can't root for these thugs, not at all, but by virtue of it being their book, they will of course beat the holy snot out of every virtuous and heroic nobody who opposes them in the issues to come. So why am I gonna read this? I don't LIKE seeing good people go down, even in comic books.
Add to that the sad mischaracterizations here. Swordsman as a lunatic, willing to beat on a crippled man? That doesn't seem at all like the heroic Swordsman Nicieza introduced us to. The only way I can see this book turning around is if it shifts focus somehow, if the unrepentant killers on the team somehow get booted and the book goes back to it's original premise about redemption against all odds. Nicieza's plots may have induced migraines with their complexity, but at least he understood what the book was supposed to be ABOUT!

Am I alone in thinking this about Thunderbolts?

I totally agree with you, but I'm hoping that the crippling of Jack will somehow do some god for the character. When they said Scarlet Spider, did they mean Steel Spider? Was that a typo or what?
 
I know peter wasn't the only Spider-man, I know there was more than one cap, and yes I'm using Avengers. My point is that from 1939 - 1986 of the DCU is completely pointless to me and maybe others because Yes, 1939 Superman=Clark Kent and Today Superman=Clark Kent, but they are not the same person in actually.

And comic fans don't have to know about the past, duh, but I WANT to know. I wanna Know how my favorite character started and how they hold up today. I, myself, want to know the history of the characters and comicbooks as a whole. Why do you think I started? You may not know, but it was for research so I could learn how to create my own. I cannot learn, without much trouble, anything about DC's characters the way I can with Marvel because the character they started with is not the same of today.

That is why I really dont care for DC.
 
Supermarvelman Returns, but has the hype passed him by?
 
Where you been man? I thought you were never posting here again?
 
Well I just needed to take a break, there wasnt much to talk about, I really didnt feel like argueing with people about dumb ****. Also my nephew/godson died a couple days ago, he was only 16 months old, so argueing with certain idiots on SHH.com was really not what I needed.
 
Well I just needed to take a break, there wasnt much to talk about, I really didnt feel like argueing with people about dumb ****. Also my nephew/godson died a couple days ago, he was only 16 months old, so argueing with certain idiots on SHH.com was really not what I needed.


Sorry about your nephew:csad:, and welcome back to the hype.
 
Thanks. I was also just reviewing posts and not posting, like I said I would, cause I'm over argueing with people so, I just felt like taking some time before I started posting again.
 
Did you buy T-bolts #111?
 
Yes I did.

I thought Swordsman was very out of characters, I'm upset that Jack got paralysed, but I'm being optimistic that somehow, Jack will someday make some big b-list comeback, him putting up such a fight and then being paralysed really grabs attention to the character. Songbird also seemed out of character, and Moonstone was a straight-up *****. When they said Scarlet Spider, did they mean Steel Spider, was that a typo?
 
I thought the same thing, smm. That was supposed to be STEEL Spider. Oopsie.
 
that could explain it, but since there next target is Steel Spider, I think it was a typo.
 
You see your argument was holding up till this point. You can't compare crisis on infinite earths with the clone saga. One was a massive crossover that encompassed every character in the DCU(multiple version of each due top the multiverse), rewrote or simply erased HUGE chunks of history, killed off vast numbers of characters and completely changed the layout and organisation of the DCU.

The clone saga on the other hand only had any real impact on spider-man titles. Yes it was overlong and contrived at times but it simply cannot be compared to an event like crisis.

They are both events that were massively confusing to new readers, but, in the case of crisis this impact was felt across ALL of the DCU's characters. It resulted in HUNDREDS of comics suddenly being declared out of continuity
It resulted in super-girl simply being erased from history. When marvel retcons it'll sort out an arc or two at most. DC on the other hand seemed to take some of their fans and slap them round the face by telling them half the comics they've bought throughout their lives are no longer relevant. That they were a waste of money. You cannot compare this on any level to the clone saga.
Tell that to Baby May:p.

Twenty years ago. TWENTY YEARS AGO the DCU did Crisis on Infinite Earths. Most people here probably never even read comic books twenty years ago. So for more than twenty years now, everything has largely existed in one universe with one timeline and one continuity. Just like Marvel. And yet Marvel fans continue to btch. Does the continuity change? Are there mistakes and retcons that pop up over and over again? Of course it does, and of course there is. And yet the Phoenix Force coccoon clusterfck never goes mentioned, Heroes Reborn is never mentioned, the joke that is Xorneto gets conveniently ignored, characters popping up left and right from Age of Apocalypse, and do we even need to bring up the Sentry whose entire existence throws logic and continuity into the meat grinder?

And you know what the punch line is? It doesn't matter. In the end, it all doesn't matter. People still manage to read comics and get caught up and follow the stories just fine, and there are still great stories despite all of this, and there are going to be bad stories too regardless. My gods, if you can somehow manage to understand Rachel Grey's storyline, you can dang well understand a multiverse. My whole point in bringing up the Clone Saga was to show that, yes, it actually doesn't matter. I'm not even referring to its quality; even if it was the best story in the world, no one reading Spider-Man stories right now needs to know about clones, because it happened a while ago and doesn't affect stories today unless it has to. It's a massive, massive part of Spider-Man's past canon, and you don't need to know a single thing about it. That was my point.
 
Heck, Hypertime probably has even less influence on the current DCU than the first Crisis did. And that's saying a lot.

photojones2 said:
my introduction to batman (comic wise) was "year one". loved it. dkr, dksa...loved them. too bad they take place in there own universe, which is not canon.

now you'll say, "you're going to take 3 batman stories out of the thousands that are out there and make a case for batman being confusing??"

yes. these are 3 of the most popular storylines, and they are what a lot of people think of when they think of batman. there are others, to be sure.

that's when i kinda fell out of dc.
Tell that to the people who liked every single "The End" book that Marvel has ever published, which also take place in alternate futures that will never actually happen. Incidentally, I love how your ultimate argument for why you fell out of DC has nothing whatsoever to do with the multiverse at all. Miller's Dark Knight stories were published as an out-of-continuity story in the first place, and it began even before Crisis on Infinite Earths! Out-of-continuity, stand-alone stories are absolutely nothing new to either company.

photojones2 said:
i think the problem here is this (read the following slowly, LittleWilly, so you can understand it):

everytime i explain my views on the dcu, you come back to counter it with a comparison to the marvel universe, saying they're alike.

instead of accepting that PEOPLE ARE DIFFERENT, and people come away from all kinds of life's experiences with DIFFERENT OUTLOOKS, you would have us believe that the only outlook or viewpoint that's worth a damn is your own.

what you could do, the next time someone talk about an experience (even something as trivial as reading comic books), that differs from your own, you could say, "well, i see what you're saying, but i think otherwise".

instead of "no, you are wrong".

do you see what i'm saying? can i make it any clearer?
If I think I'm right, I'm going to tell you exactly why I think I'm right. And if I think you're wrong, I'm going to tell you exactly why I think you're wrong. That's all I've been doing here.

There's such a thing as personal taste, and then there's such a thing as just flat-out getting the facts wrong or spreading inaccurate information. People do have different tastes. People do like different things. Marvel and DC do have their differences, which is why I sometimes prefer one over the other too. But the reasons you've been giving for preferring one over the other are either traits that both universes share or ones that currently affect neither. When I, and others, call you out on this, your responses have invariably been to either drag up more examples of the same thing, or a simple "Whatever, it just is." You spout a bunch of criticisms, and they either don't hold up under scrutiny or can't be backed up. To be completely blunt about it, you sound like the typical, model Marvel Zombie.

Like the gal said, I'm not saying that I care. I'm just saying that I'm saying.

photojones2 said:
and while i'm at it, have you actually read the other posts since this started?

if so you'll see that people agree with you, but do so without coming off like an asshat. people have also posted remarks ABOUT you acting like an asshat. and people have posted comments that in agreement to mine. does that have ANY effect on you??
Yes, it tells me I'm probably being meaner than I should be. It doesn't tell me that I'm wrong.
 
Heck, Hypertime probably has even less influence on the current DCU than the first Crisis did. And that's saying a lot.

Tell that to the people who liked every single "The End" book that Marvel has ever published, which also take place in alternate futures that will never actually happen. Incidentally, I love how your ultimate argument for why you fell out of DC has nothing whatsoever to do with the multiverse at all. Miller's Dark Knight stories were published as an out-of-continuity story in the first place, and it began even before Crisis on Infinite Earths! Out-of-continuity, stand-alone stories are absolutely nothing new to either company.

i'm not a fan of the end books, so your argument's lost on me there. and if you'll remember, the "year one" story WAS in continuity when it was published (within the batman comic). and it stayed canon until zero hour. if you're going to try and teach, then get the facts straight.


If I think I'm right, I'm going to tell you exactly why I think I'm right. And if I think you're wrong, I'm going to tell you exactly why I think you're wrong. That's all I've been doing here.

how many times do you have to do that, though? you complain about me repeating myself, but you haven't been saying the same thing over and over?

There's such a thing as personal taste, and then there's such a thing as just flat-out getting the facts wrong or spreading inaccurate information. People do have different tastes. People do like different things. Marvel and DC do have their differences, which is why I sometimes prefer one over the other too. But the reasons you've been giving for preferring one over the other are either traits that both universes share or ones that currently affect neither. When I, and others, call you out on this, your responses have invariably been to either drag up more examples of the same thing, or a simple "Whatever, it just is." You spout a bunch of criticisms, and they either don't hold up under scrutiny or can't be backed up. To be completely blunt about it, you sound like the typical, model Marvel Zombie.

i'll be the first to admit, i AM a bit of a marvel zombie. most of the superhero stuff i buy is marvel.


Yes, it tells me I'm probably being meaner than I should be. It doesn't tell me that I'm wrong.

you still can't get it can you?

there's no right or wrong here. it all comes down to preference.

and yes, you are an ***hole.

i'd like to just shake hands and walk away, but i get the feeling you don't wash after wiping.
 
Not Jake and Brianwilly

I am prepared to eat crow. Astonishing X-Men #20 was fantastic. I also must applaud Joss for writing Wolverine's powers as they should be, he either didnt get the Guggenheim memo or chose to ignore it, but all good ineed. I am prepared to give this comics a 5/5, 10/10


Why not 12/12?
 
Sweet baby Buffy. Have you been showered by the sweet golden dew of the Whedharma?





I've heard people actually say that in real life, by the way. We're...strange.

Not really. Believe it or not, I like Whedon, I'm just not obsessive.
 
Not really. Believe it or not, I like Whedon, I'm just not obsessive.

i think whedon would be at his absolute best if he had a co-writer. someone to help with the plots.

but his characterization is superb. :up:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,275
Messages
22,078,621
Members
45,878
Latest member
Remembrance1988
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"