January comes to an end, as does one overdue event mini, as SIEGE chugs along. Let's get started, and as usual, full spoilers and rants ahead.
As always, reviews are posted at Examiner first.
DREAD'S BOUGHT/THOUGHT FOR 1/27/10:
AVENGERS: THE INITIATIVE #32: The official start of the SIEGE tie in that will see this series to it's seemingly finale. I have little doubt that this series will be relaunched with a new title. Marvel usually gives books that make it three years at least one relaunch, and plus, if Marvel can sell 3 Avengers titles within the Top 50-75, they will. Gage, though, while tying into the event, still keeps his subplots flowing for long term readers. This issue continues well from the last, with focus mostly on Taskmaster, Constrictor, and Diamondback. Aboard for art is Mahmud Asrar, co-creator and former regular artist on DYNAMO 5, and his stuff is pretty damn spiffy here, especially alongside Rebecca Buchman's inks and Jay Ramos' colors. Gage summarizes Taskmaster's origin and uses it in context to where he is now, a blue collar villain being thrust into the big time, whether he likes it or not. Taskmaster at least is choosing to figure out how to make it his own, versus being a pawn. He's probably still Osborn's pawn here, but he wants to capitalize on the opportunity, or at least die with his head held high. Constrictor, on the other hand, is more conflicted, especially since he is dating Diamondback, the mole in Osborn's initiative. Probably one of the strongest bits was Tasky summarizing what separated him from types like Osborn or Doom; INSANITY. Or, "laying all your cards on the table and getting your hands dirty", in so many words. There's also the sense that in trying to embrace what he has been thrust into, Taskmaster may be flying too high to survive the fall, as he feared in the past. But that's subtle, as it should be.
So the Osborn Initiative starts their raid on Asgard, tying into SIEGE #1. Taskmaster successfully kills 2-3 random Asgardians; the action is paced well, although "William the Warrior" managed to kill one of them. Some of the banter among the villains about whether they'd survive a fight against Asgardians was also amusing. One group shot seems to show Tarene/Thor Girl fighting among those in Asgard, which is good because she really should have popped into THOR sooner or later; Sif also makes a cameo. Will the cyborg Ragnarok come to make a mess of things as well?
The only territory where Gage shifts from SIEGE #1 is the end, when the villains are piling on Thor. In SIEGE #1, Thor was basically nuked by several energy blasts from Iron Patriot and the U-Foes zapping him full force, at once. Here, he seems to be the victim of a pile on, although I suppose these bits take place as the TV news report was pulling away from Thor in SIEGE #1. Basically, Taskmaster jumps in to land a crack against Thor's head with his imitation Captain America shield, while Diamondback seems to watch, conflicted about whether to expose herself to help Thor versus being able to actually do it even if she wanted to.
Justice also vows to utilize this opportunity to raid the HAMMER Compound to reveal Osborn's treachery once and for all, as well as figuring out that the U-Foes were paid off in advance for staging the battle with Volstagg that sparked SIEGE. He only has a few pages but once again Vance has risen into a real leader across Gage's run. Ultra-Girl still seems to be the partisan one of the Avengers Resistance, which isn't a drag but it does become predictable; every time I expect some character to argue against whatever Tigra or Justice or Night-Thrasher, it usually is Ultra-Girl, and I am not usually wrong (at last since Debrii left). Part of me will be a little miffed if the Slapstick/Gauntlet subplot is never addressed; shouldn't Sgt. Green at least have some words for the clown that nearly killed him?
I hated seeing DYNAMO 5 run so behind and it did stink knowing that Asrar would leave the franchise he helped make alongside Jay Faerber, but I also knew that he likely did so to do more artwork for Marvel. He's drawn thinks for Marvel's space arm here and there; he'll be doing an issue of NOVA soon. It was a pleasant surprise seeing his artwork here, in another reliably good book.
Every month, I sometimes have to debate with myself which is the better Avengers title, this or Dan Slott's MIGHTY AVENGERS. I certainly enjoy having two good Avengers compete for quality every month like this, and I hope both return after April 2010. I sometimes fear this book is more unappreciated than MIGHTY, when it's really an exceptional place for characters who easily get lost in the shuffle or killed off in background pages of major events by Mark Millar to show up and be written excellently. I enjoy every month of it and will hate to see it go, although I will be interested in the ending for this volume that Gage has planned, and now has 3 issues to set up.
CAPTAIN AMERICA REBORN #6: May as well get this over with now. This'll be very rough, as a warning.
I bought this, and I am a sucker. I have been a sucker for Marvel for probably at least 4-6 years now, sticking with some titles longer than I should have for all sorts of baloney reasons or justifications, like NEW AVENGERS or much of the ULTIMATE line by 2007. There are far better uses for $3.99 than buying this. It could be donated to the relief effort in Haiti, or donated to any charity or poor box. It could buy a local vagrant a nice fast food dinner, or at least a fresh bottle of beer. It could be set aflame and the ashes scattered. All would be more useful than spending it on this. Yeah, retailers would suffer if they can't move copies of this, but many over order everything "hot". I still pity them for getting rooked on CAPTAIN AMERICA #600. That was a good mega issue, but not worth the massive over orders or as vital as Marvel bleated.
There is only one thing that happens in this issue that wasn't foretold in advance. Sin gets burned in the final battle and her face now looks to be a red skull. It happens so quickly you're bound to miss it and it seems obvious that Brubaker will make her Red Skull II or Lady Red Skull in some future arc of CAPTAIN AMERICA, which will likely remind us of this event and embellish it in so much superior detail, that reading about it here really was of little consequence to reading it later. Aside for that, it's really what you would expect, because this ran late, and was given a longer schedule midway through, so other books, including epilogue stories, revealed this in advance.
The thing is, even without the spoilers, this is basically a very average action blockbuster for Brubaker standards, trying to become so big that it stretches thin. Bryan Hitch's art seriously doesn't help it; if anything, the setting makes it look too much like the finale to ULTIMATES 2 #12-13 to the point where if I mixed random pages of this in with random pages of that to a casual reader very quickly, they would probably assume all were from the same story. It has that sameness to it, that "I don't care" quality to almost every panel. If the book had ran on schedule, it probably wouldn't have read much better. But what can we expect? Not only did Marvel extend the race track midway through the sprint, they should know by now that Hitch has run at least a month behind schedule for every single project he has been assigned to for, oh, the last five years. His rendition of Khoi Pham's Wasp design also takes some getting used to; for a "realistic costume artist", he doesn't seem to know that Pym wears goggles, not a Gambit style "non-mask", which are actually more realistic. So this mess is really one of Marvel editorial's own making. Even without that, though, Brubaker has the task of trying to wrap up about four years of subplots while resurrecting Steve Rogers with an explanation that is so complicated, I need to pay someone from H & R Block $135 just to explain it to me. Rogers' big moment of being "back", mind, body and soul is not there, because other books ruined it, because this is late. So what do we have? A boxing match against some MODOK clones, and the issue's other big tidbit, Red Skull growing to 60 feet tall for really no good reason (beyond Sharon Carter zapping Skull with Pym's instrument, stupidly thinking it was a weapon when Pym just showed her it adjusts the sizes of things by freeing her). I suppose the aspect of a giant robot Red Skull is so absurd and random that it's either awesome or ludicrous, depending on your mood.
This ending is really the same as the last time Red Skull died; despite all his raving, Sharon Carter kills him. Only this time he's a giant robot Nazi, and she uses his ship to do it with missiles. It's at least as much of an anti-climax as in ANNIHILATION CONQUEST when Ultron grew to 60 feet tall, only for Phyla and Adam Warlock to kill him with ONE ATTACK. It's as if the artist begged and pleaded to draw a giant villain, and the writer sighed, relented, and made it moot. "There, fine, you had your giant villain moment, now can we please finish this and move onto something better?" I suppose Sharon has suffered the most under Skull's plan, although seeing Brubaker repeat a finale, just with a bigger budget, wasn't quite what I desired. Having Red Skull stay dead and be replaced by his daughter is sort of like the aspect of James Barnes taking over as Cap; it's a fine idea that Brubaker will probably execute well, but as soon as he leaves the book, it'll be undone and probably meaningless.
The issue has some good moments. Even with flaws and spoilers, this event had a clear beginning, middle and end. It had a story structure and flow. And that is where we are at in 2010 for Marvel events after years of Bendis/Millar; a story is "good" if it merely follows the rules to be a narrative instead of being a checklist of advertising stunts. Falcon has a nice moment against Crossbones, and it is cool to see Steve quickly fall into things and order the Avengers around as if he never left. It leads well into WHO WILL WIELD THE SHIELD, the epilogue that was released A MONTH AGO and was actually so much better than this that comparisons fail.
It features a fold out cover of characters who are in no way involved or meet Captain America at the end. Barnes himself becomes a spectator at the end of the series. Yes, we KNEW Rogers would overthrow Skull from his mind in time; did we really need to waste 8 pages of fighting to do that? For all of Brubaker's skill in pacing battles with one vs. many or one vs. one, he seemed to have more difficulty with a group brawl, and it failed to thrill me. Without that, this issue has nothing to offer that is not handled better in WWTS #1, or CA #602, both out now. I suppose it's no worse than some of the fights in SIEGE #1 (where you get lost trying to figure out who is fighting who or what and it doesn't matter from one panel to the next), but my expectations for Brubaker are higher. I suppose he has better rapport with more of his regular artists like Epting or Ross than Hitch.
Are there worse issues and stories to be a sucker for? Yes. But just because there are worse injuries than a twisted ankle doesn't mean one should cheer if they suffer one, or have it inflicted upon them by unsportsmanlike play. Marvel gave Brubaker no favors with this series, and even without the publishing snafu, this was not his best. Expectations were too high and even at 5 issues there was drag in the middle, let alone at six. I am glad that this is over, and that Brubaker has rebounded to his usual degree of excellence on subsequent Cap material. If I convinced one person to not buy this and not be a sucker like me, I'll be a happy man. There are really only a few reasons to buy it; completist (which, I am learning, is nice way of saying sucker), admitting you're a sucker, or being a fan of Hitch artwork, or slavishly following anything Brubaker writes, even if it's been predicted for you. Some people do DVR a sports game, watch news scores and highlights about the game, then bother with watching the damn thing anyway, even though it's moot because they know all the points and all the moves (especially the end). REBORN simply seemed far too familiar for a mainstream Marvel non space event; the further it goes, the worse things get. Brubaker at least manages to keep things mildly above mediocrity, but from him that can be the most damning of all.
I'm glad this is over. I'll have forgotten this mess by tomorrow. Maybe it isn't fair that Brubaker & Hitch get the brunt of Marvel's editorial screw up, but it's certainly not my fault. At the PLANET HULK screening I was less than 30 feet from Joe Quesada and he's a fine enough guy in person, but some of the editorial philosophy around Marvel these days is taking fans for suckers. An honest fan who reads more than one Marvel title and doesn't download or whatever was turned into a sucker because of editorial incompetence, and a story that genuinely NEEDED every element of surprise it could get to even come close to be considered "good", of B+ quality, didn't get it. It isn't right for a comic company to make suckers out of honest fans, then act like they're morally superior when DC does something gimmicky. This is why people trade wait; this is why people illegally download, and this is why every single issue of a Big Two comic is someone's last.
Even the ad that is in this comic for the ULTIMATUM HC shows that sort of contempt, "take fans for suckers" philosophy. Ignoring the fact that ULTIMATUM is literally the worst comic book story of the past 10 years; the very advert for it says, "witness the end of the Ultimate universe". That's a crock of **** because if the Ultimate Universe ended, why are they still selling new Ultimate books (soon to be back up to 3-4 titles, including mini's)? Is a fan not supposed to be paying enough attention to know that much, but enough attention to throw away $20 on that rubbish? Obviously ULTIMATUM did nothing to "end" the Ultimate universe. All it did was off some characters and cause some books to relaunch. You've got to be kidding me. Marvel, don't take your audience for idiots, for once in this new century, please.
If Marvel wanted to show they cared, they wouldn't offer a trade of BLACKEST NIGHT for a DEADPOOL cover. They'd apologize for this debacle, knock at least 50 cents off the cover price as a retailer and fan incentive, and go from there. But no, they don't, because they expect fans to be stupid, gullible suckers. And for buying this, I guess I proved them right, because I must be one. And that's the worst kind of feeling for a paying fan, to be made to feel like a fool for continuing to offer my time and business.
If Marvel wants to invigorate the genre, maybe they'll start to act like professionals, and not a bunch of children with ADHD who don't know what each arm of their company is doing, not so willing to sacrifice a story or a creator's initiative for a quick buck. That'd be a real "HEROIC AGE".
I haven't been this pissed about a comic since ULTIMATE SPIDER-MAN #100-something, when the Ultimate Clone Saga came to an end. People who go, "oh, this has nothing to do with the story" miss the point entirely. A movie patron would have every right to be insulted if the studio did something that ruined the movie watching experience, even if it wasn't the fault of the film itself, and would likely have a negative opinion about the film. Imagine if IRON MAN 2 allowed a select number of fans to purchase tickets in advance, and then as they lined up to see it, aired the entire third act of the film on the wall (as well as on TV, and online) as they waited to take their seats, ruining the entire experience and making them suckers, the last to know. Would patrons be justified in feeling cheated? Marvel asked fans for an investment of $15, then $18, and then proceeded to make it worth $0 in terms of story integrity. Brubaker deserved better, Captain America deserved better, and the fans deserved better. Even Hitch deserved better; I mean I'm sure he knows his own schedule; is it his fault he's never given enough lead time, and then asked with an extra issue midway? Considering that, the fact he was only a month behind is a miracle, even if it was a month too much.
Maybe I am being hard on this, but if this issue was going to compensate for having all of the hype and surprise ruined for it, it had to be the best ****ing thing of the week. WHO WILL WIELD THE SHIELD #1 managed that in December. This didn't, at all.
If I remember anything about this story, maybe I will remember how not to be a sucker the next time. Maybe. But, I'm sure it'll sell about 90,000 copies and Marvel won't learn diddly ****.
The only other tidbit that is worth mentioning is Steve's supposed visions of the future, seeing a New York seemingly trashed by alien looking monsters. While it could be something Brubaker is cooking, at the "PLANET HULK" screening in NYC, Joe Quesada stated that 2010 would see more involvement from Marvel's "space arm" with the rest of the line at their "Creator Summit", so it could be possible that The Fault from the space books, and the weird cancer creatures that infest the other side of the portal, could effect Earth. But that's just my vague guess. For all we know, Steve just had too magic mushrooms in the future.