• The upgrade to XenForo 2.3.7 has now been completed. Please report any issues to our administrators.

Bought/Thought March 25th *SPOILERS*

Garney's been a phenomenal artist since he hopped onto Amazing Spider-Man, as far as I'm concerned. The vast majority of current artists can be described as "good, but _________." Garney has no buts. He's the total package. Dude knows how to draw anything, he can draw it really, really well, and he can imbue it with almost a life of its own. His comics practically live and breathe for me.
 
Yeah, I usually like Garney's stuff, too.
 
Divito's female characters all have the same weirdly pinched face; that's my main issue with his art.
 
WAR OF KINGS: DARKHAWK #2 also had a color reprint of DARKHAWK #2, circa 1991, where Darkhawk got to fight Hobgoblin and his title had the obligatory "second issue guest appearance by Spider-Man" that a lot of titles had in the late 80's into the 90's at the launch period (even NFL SUPERPRO, which believe it or not lasted a full year). In it Spider-Man references Nova from a recent meeting with the New Warriors and kind of dismisses him as a kid-hero, which is almost funny now considering how many immature compromises Spider-Man has made in the last few years when things got tough, and Richard hasn't.

The other thing was getting to recall that in 1991, comic books were still $1. Some 18 years later and the price has risen almost 200-300% for some books. That's either good or bad, depending. Inflation for the last 18 years has been around 80% I think.
 
DiVitto needs more work,his art is phenomenal,I could really see him going nuts on Loeb's Hulk book.

Haven't been to the shop in quite some time,but I cannot wait to snatch up Cap and DD.It's just a shame that Hammond isn't back :(.
 
I'm sure he'll come back someday. He's done it before, so there's no "sacred cow syndrome" with him.
 
My favorites of the week were Elektra #1, Immortal Iron Fist #24 (big surprise...didn't think I'd like this one), and Commissioner Gordon: One Shot (artwork was meh, but it worked for me). Cap #48, JLA #31 (first time to pick up JLA), and Spawn #190 (bad decision on my part to jump in during a 7+ part story arc) were so-so in my opinion.

We're having a contest over at www.heroicmonkey.com, if you're interested in winning some free comics. It's painfully easy to win the contest, and free comics in this difficult economy - can't beat that. The next contest will go online later this evening, and will include some of the comics that I've mentioned above, so keep an eye out.
 
Garney's been a phenomenal artist since he hopped onto Amazing Spider-Man, as far as I'm concerned. The vast majority of current artists can be described as "good, but _________." Garney has no buts. He's the total package. Dude knows how to draw anything, he can draw it really, really well, and he can imbue it with almost a life of its own. His comics practically live and breathe for me.
I agree, the guy's awesome. His work on Skaar was great.
 
Yeah. Shame he's off, but Lim's good too. His art reminds me of when I first discovered comics as a kid. He was drawing the Silver Surfer and it was awesome. :)
 
As do many adults.

Touche'.

DiVitto needs more work,his art is phenomenal,I could really see him going nuts on Loeb's Hulk book.

Haven't been to the shop in quite some time,but I cannot wait to snatch up Cap and DD.It's just a shame that Hammond isn't back :(.

I'm happy with DiVito "going nuts" on Abnett & Lanning's NOVA for a while. Loeb's HULK is "dumb fun" at BEST; NOVA's simply GOOD. :o

If they wanted a new android Human Torch, his younger counterpart Tara is still alive and "un-evil" I think. Still, I am not sure there is a great need for Hammond to return. Toro might be interesting, considering he was a mutant and considering WWAAAAYYYYY back in 80's POWER PACK comics they had a mentor who was vaguely hinted at being Toro, but it was never revealed. But that's sort of my own pet theory.
 
The other thing was getting to recall that in 1991, comic books were still $1. Some 18 years later and the price has risen almost 200-300% for some books. That's either good or bad, depending. Inflation for the last 18 years has been around 80% I think.

Dread, you should know that the most probable cause for that is that in the mid 90's there was a lot of merging in the paper mill (primarily newsprint mills) industry. A couple of companies went around buying up as many paper mills as they could and then shutting them down to drive up the price of newsprint. In just the last year and a half my printing costs for my paper has jumped 40% and is expected to go up again.

Now, you combine that with the fact that the economy is struggling (and has struggled for a few years now) and the first thing that is cut out of budgets is advertising and there you have the dramatic inflation of comics. Publishers increase cover price to offset the loss in advertising revenue and the additional cost of newsprint.
 
Immortal Iron Fist #24: Great one shot story. I've loved every one shot story of a past Iron Fist and Park Li was great to read about. I agree with Dread, he was more of an artist at best then a fighter, Li was different. Anyone feel he had some sort of a Gandhi vibe to him? Great art by Kano and Duane really has a good control of the series. Can't wait till #25, the fight with Danny and Quan should be good.
 
Dread, you should know that the most probable cause for that is that in the mid 90's there was a lot of merging in the paper mill (primarily newsprint mills) industry. A couple of companies went around buying up as many paper mills as they could and then shutting them down to drive up the price of newsprint. In just the last year and a half my printing costs for my paper has jumped 40% and is expected to go up again.

Now, you combine that with the fact that the economy is struggling (and has struggled for a few years now) and the first thing that is cut out of budgets is advertising and there you have the dramatic inflation of comics. Publishers increase cover price to offset the loss in advertising revenue and the additional cost of newsprint.

I am more than aware of the utter collapse of ad revenue in printed mediums. Simply compare a Marvel comic now versus, say, about a year and a half ago and the ad difference, at least for ads that aren't for "in house" Marvel things, is very clear.

The only dilemma in raising the prices so dramatically is that it forces retailers to sacrifice the books that sell about average or less to afford the wholesale prices for big books. For example, when NEW AVENGERS is $3, it costs a shop about $1.50 per copy at wholesale. Now it costs $2 since the book is now $4. Unlike the government, the retailers usually have to maintain a budget, so they trim the fat by ordering fewer of those midcard books like INCREDIBLE HERCULES or NOVA. The fact that in Feb. 2009, there was a large gap of books that sold at above 90k (five of them) and those that sold 77k or below (everything else); not one book from 89k-78k, which is quite rare. I just am curious if sacrificing the mid-level to low level books to sustain the big ones is good for the long term. Still, it may be a rock/hard place type situation.
 
The only dilemma in raising the prices so dramatically is that it forces retailers to sacrifice the books that sell about average or less to afford the wholesale prices for big books. For example, when NEW AVENGERS is $3, it costs a shop about $1.50 per copy at wholesale. Now it costs $2 since the book is now $4. Unlike the government, the retailers usually have to maintain a budget, so they trim the fat by ordering fewer of those midcard books like INCREDIBLE HERCULES or NOVA. The fact that in Feb. 2009, there was a large gap of books that sold at above 90k (five of them) and those that sold 77k or below (everything else); not one book from 89k-78k, which is quite rare. I just am curious if sacrificing the mid-level to low level books to sustain the big ones is good for the long term. Still, it may be a rock/hard place type situation.

I agree, it's a shame that some really good books are going to suffer because of the price hikes. Nova is actually my favorite comic right now and I'm afraid it is going to be lost at some point.

Back to the rise in cover price, being a publisher myself, I can tell you that we can overcome some loss in ad revenue, but when we are getting hit repeatedly with a 50% increase in our costs to print, increase in fuel charges for delivery, and just a general increase in inflation it is more than we can handle when it is coming from all sides. My publication is a free community paper so I can't really start charging without losing circulation and causing my advertisers to lose response to their advertising, but for a publisher that is already charging a cover price raising it is an easy if not temporary fix. It's kind of a darned-if-you-do, darned-if-you-don't situation. I see it in the newspaper industry all the time, papers raise their cover price thinking they will increase revenue, when all it does is make some people not buy their product at all and then the advertisers start losing customer response to their ads. So in fact, they lose revenue in the long-run. It's a terrible cycle, but one that happens daily.
 
I just read Skaar Son of Hulk #9 FINALLY.

It was pretty freakin' awesome. Plus there's only one more issue before Planet Skaar starts and that REALLY sounds like it's going to be badass.
 
Skaar was great. I knew there was a catch to the Hulk appearing, but I thought it was just a hallucination. Then Axeman Bone acknowledges him and I was like, "Whoa, wait a sec..." It's nice to see that Caiera's still around in some fashion. I hope she doesn't just crumble into nothing. It'd be nice if she stuck around to take a more active role in Skaar's development, since Old Sam clearly isn't planning to mentor him any further.
 
I'm guessing that Silver Surfer is going to take him to Earth so his dad can kick his ass.

It would be funny if Planet Skaar occurred as if Loeb's last 9 (or 10?) issues never happened. Funny and awesome.
 
I hope that's the case, since I don't really care to see Loeb have any influence on the crossover at all.
 
I agree, it's a shame that some really good books are going to suffer because of the price hikes. Nova is actually my favorite comic right now and I'm afraid it is going to be lost at some point.

Me too. We'll see if WAR OF KINGS gives it any sort of boost. X-MEN KINGBREAKER was the best selling of the space books right now, selling over 30k more or less. NOVA at the very least has remained steady at 25k for two months. Hopefully whatever retailer fat-trimming that has been done to save money for the higher priced bigger books has ceased. NOVA and many of the ANNIHILATION era space books have proven to have a small but loyal following; they've usually been faring better than the last Marvel cult franchise, the RUNAWAYS, for at least a year now.

Back to the rise in cover price, being a publisher myself, I can tell you that we can overcome some loss in ad revenue, but when we are getting hit repeatedly with a 50% increase in our costs to print, increase in fuel charges for delivery, and just a general increase in inflation it is more than we can handle when it is coming from all sides. My publication is a free community paper so I can't really start charging without losing circulation and causing my advertisers to lose response to their advertising, but for a publisher that is already charging a cover price raising it is an easy if not temporary fix. It's kind of a darned-if-you-do, darned-if-you-don't situation. I see it in the newspaper industry all the time, papers raise their cover price thinking they will increase revenue, when all it does is make some people not buy their product at all and then the advertisers start losing customer response to their ads. So in fact, they lose revenue in the long-run. It's a terrible cycle, but one that happens daily.

Yeah, I do understand that it is a rock/hard place problem. With the loss of ad revenue, Marvel needs to make up those losses to keep their publishing arm level at the least, much less making a profit (they earn more from movies now, but Marvel's publishing arm held steady in their 2008 end quarter report; a feat considering the collapse of many of the print medium during the recession). Ad dollars are so desperate that Marvel is willing to peddle a WB/DC cartoon, WONDER WOMAN, on back covers (as well as THE DARK KNIGHT, a few months ago).

That said, Joe Quesada has been less eager to hold prices down than Bill Jemas was; when Jemas was still around, there were still some books at $2.25 as recently as 2004-2005. Soon as he left, they were $2.99 within about 12-18 months, line wide. Even the kiddie books (Archie and DC keep their kid books cheaper, usually about $2.50). Therefore, it is little surprise that when times got tough, Joe Q lifted prices for a good 60% of their books an extra buck with no gradual phasing period, and cynically dismissed all criticism as, basically, "our customers are loyal suckers", not much different from many big wigs involved in professional sports.

Some have suggested adopting the Japanese model; cheap anthologies on crap grade paper for the lowest price, better grade B&W for a middle price for each franchise, and the full color, full grade highest price for the hardcores. They claim that since this works in Japan and those comics, even now, sell double or triple what American ones do combined, it should be attempted. The only problem is that Japan as a society views comics a bit differently. They may be more mainstream than they are in America, even despite a good 8-10 years of comic-themed blockbuster films. It is not uncommon in Japan to see the most straight-laced businessmen reading a manga on the train; you are far less likely to see that in America.

It is a cycle, but the problem with cycles is that if you or a business enterprise, or an entire industry, just collectively shrugs it's shoulders and goes, "such is life", eventually it may collapse. It remains to be seen what the impact of the higher prices will be overall in comics, but from sales figures I saw in January and February, the big books are still selling about the same despite the hike in prices, but a lot of the middle and low selling books that once were stable have lost thousands of readers, and even books that were only seeing low "diminishing returns" have increased. ASM weekly has fallen below 60k a week, something that in 2008 seemed impossible. Beyond UNCANNY X-MEN, all the X-Men books are selling under 70k. Random, unpromoted Wolverine or X-Men one-shots can't even sell within the Top 60 anymore. This is an industry that views losing some 2-4% of it's readers a month, every month, as "normal" and just shrugs and waits for the next steroid injection, the crossover, to give a boost before it starts again.

Frankly, the biggest problem with the comic industry is that they are businesses run by people who usually have no clue how to run a business (being artists/writers at heart), and usually all they can come up with to solve a problem is, "well, let's use what worked in 1994/1984/1974". It's a backwards cottage industry, and I sometimes fear for it's long term health, especially since I naturally do enjoy many of the characters.
 
Frankly, the biggest problem with the comic industry is that they are businesses run by people who usually have no clue how to run a business (being artists/writers at heart), and usually all they can come up with to solve a problem is, "well, let's use what worked in 1994/1984/1974". It's a backwards cottage industry, and I sometimes fear for it's long term health, especially since I naturally do enjoy many of the characters.


I really think that is over simplistic. The truth is that the two companies that make up 80% of the volume are not just in the business of writing comic books. They are in the toy business, the movie business (Marvel, literally, with their own production arm), the video game business, the serial novel business, the liscensing business. They liken themselves more to Disney than they do J.K. Rowling.

Marvel is not where it is today because of JQ (although I'm sure his bosses are very, very happy with how he's handled his piece of the puzzle), they're there becaue of Avi Arad, et al..

In terms of publishing, sure, Marvel does it's share of events, etc. But they do want to make money, and it gives them the leeway to make in-ways in more niche-like markets (the cosmic titles being the most obvious example), giving more obscure titles/characters a shot (Nova, Ant-Man, MTU, Terror,Inc, Alias), and trying out new characters (Gravity, Runaways, Young Avengers, New X-Men) Any one of which may turn into some strain of success 5,10,15 years down the line. Any of which may turn into a cartoon, movie, video game, or a long running title.

Not that these guys don't have problems ahead of them, price and access to their characters being prime among them, but sometimes I think you guys are so determined to see what these companies are doing wrong, that you can't see what they're doing right.
 
I know what Marvel is doing right. They went bankrupt majorly because they used to rely far more on the publishing wing than they do now. Post-2000, you are correct, Marvel relies more on the multi-media profits than they do the publishing, especially as they move to create their own films and thus share more of the profits, such as with IRON MAN or INCREDIBLE HULK, and other upcoming films. The cuts they got from Sony for SPIDER-MAN or Fox for X-MEN are not as hefty, but can cover some comic losses nevertheless.

Still, the comics themselves have to be able to turn a profit or hold steady. DC has WB at their back but even they have to cut losing titles (see BLUE BEETLE). I just rarely see any ideas or strategies that are really new or innovative in the industry. It's always just, "well, this worked in 1986, let's try it now!" See NEW MUTANTS. Marvel has no clue what to do with that franchise nor why it needs to exist. But they have always published it, so they continue to try without rethinking what is broken with it. And on it goes.
 
I know what Marvel is doing right. They went bankrupt majorly because they used to rely far more on the publishing wing than they do now. Post-2000, you are correct, Marvel relies more on the multi-media profits than they do the publishing, especially as they move to create their own films and thus share more of the profits, such as with IRON MAN or INCREDIBLE HULK, and other upcoming films. The cuts they got from Sony for SPIDER-MAN or Fox for X-MEN are not as hefty, but can cover some comic losses nevertheless.

Still, the comics themselves have to be able to turn a profit or hold steady. DC has WB at their back but even they have to cut losing titles (see BLUE BEETLE). I just rarely see any ideas or strategies that are really new or innovative in the industry. It's always just, "well, this worked in 1986, let's try it now!" See NEW MUTANTS. Marvel has no clue what to do with that franchise nor why it needs to exist. But they have always published it, so they continue to try without rethinking what is broken with it. And on it goes.


And now we have some more interesting characters (Rockslide, Dust, Elixir, Pixie). New Mutants/New X-Men is an example that Marvel gets it, not that they don't.

If what you're talking about is for Marvel to do more things like Walking Dead, or Fables, or Sandman, well, that's not their niche. I would love to see them try things like that, but another rule of business is that when you try to be all things to all people, you end up presiding over a big, confusing mess.
 
Skaar was great. I knew there was a catch to the Hulk appearing, but I thought it was just a hallucination. Then Axeman Bone acknowledges him and I was like, "Whoa, wait a sec..." It's nice to see that Caiera's still around in some fashion. I hope she doesn't just crumble into nothing. It'd be nice if she stuck around to take a more active role in Skaar's development, since Old Sam clearly isn't planning to mentor him any further.

Yeah, even though it was just a construct, seeing the Hulk back on Sakaar and interacting with the denizens there just made me realize how badly he really should have stayed there.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"