Rise of the Silver Surfer BOX OFFICE Discussion

The movie was far from being a flop. 273 million $ worldwide and it's not out in Japan, yet.
More than the Hulk movie worldwide, with a lot less product placement.
The competition this summer was deadly and the movie's quality wasn't so high that the general public wanted a second view.


I totally agree with you.....on all counts.
 
It opened in China, and Lithuania this weekend. Japan the 21st. FF did $ 2.5 in China. $ 16,000 in Lithuania. $ 9.1 million in Japan. $ 11.6 million from those 3 countries.
 
Here's an msnbc report that refers to FF2 as a huge blockbuster and a "hit". Maybe that's enough for a sequel.

The 8th paragraph talks about it....

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20563379/

Well. They did not call it a "huge" blockbuster, but it was a hit. The top tier movies were the bulk, and every other movie chiped in. It's like any team effort. You have your superstars, then you have your bench players. Without the bench players, you don't win a championship. Without the FF's, Oceans 13's, and Live Free or Die Hard's, 4 billion would not have been obtainable. However, that is a positive sign. FF 2 will hit $ 280 WW. That's nothing to overlook. With the studio getting 55 %, that's $ 154 million. Plus DVD sales, plus cable, plus toy and product tie ins.
 
Well. They did not call it a "huge" blockbuster, but it was a hit. The top tier movies were the bulk, and every other movie chiped in. It's like any team effort. You have your superstars, then you have your bench players. Without the bench players, you don't win a championship. Without the FF's, Oceans 13's, and Live Free or Die Hard's, 4 billion would not have been obtainable. However, that is a positive sign. FF 2 will hit $ 280 WW. That's nothing to overlook. With the studio getting 55 %, that's $ 154 million. Plus DVD sales, plus cable, plus toy and product tie ins.

True, they were talking about Spidey, Shrek and Pirates...

It was the first summer ever to start with three such huge blockbusters, yet Hollywood lost momentum in June. The month had hits with Universal's "Knocked Up" and 20th Century Fox's "Live Free or Die Hard" and "Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer."
 
^^ Well like a woman who once said even the dogs eat the crumbs from the children's table, we will take it.

FF2 was a hit, hurray. Perception is everything.
 
To put things in perspective, apparently the only sequal which outperformed its predecessor this year was The Bourne Ultimatum. Not even Pirates accomplished that.
 
Spidey 3 did...Worldwide. :)

Domestically the studios jammed everything into May giving them not enough room to breathe. Spidey's ok against films that make 100 million or even 200 million but when you throw in 2 more 300 million dollar films in the same month forget it. Plus it was kind of long.
 
The sad fact is it could have been a top 10 franchise. The 1st movie sunk the franchise from that top 10 potential. I don't blame Story, I blame Frost since he was listed as the writer. Payne did an excelent job. And the movie has done very, very well if you take out the top 10 movies this year. You want to compair it with the top tier movies this year, then yes it has performed poorley. Compaired to the rest it has done excelent. $ 280, 285 WW is nothing to sneeze at.

Blaming only Frost and not Story as well is just completely ridiculous, unless you thought the direction of the film was well done.

But that brings me to the point of...choosing a good script is just one of many tasks a director has to undertake. So in that department, Story fell short and Frost & Payne just did flat out bad jobs. Story, Payne, and Frost are all to blame for a poor screenplay unless Fox decided every aspect and they were only hired hands.
 
Story, Payne, and Frost are all to blame for a poor screenplay unless Fox decided every aspect and they were only hired hands.

I think that scenario was a lot closer to reality than we're ever gonna hear about.
 
The sad fact is it could have been a top 10 franchise. The 1st movie sunk the franchise from that top 10 potential. I don't blame Story, I blame Frost since he was listed as the writer. Payne did an excelent job. And the movie has done very, very well if you take out the top 10 movies this year. You want to compair it with the top tier movies this year, then yes it has performed poorley. Compaired to the rest it has done excelent. $ 280, 285 WW is nothing to sneeze at.


Exactly what portion of the script did Frost write? Only the parts you disliked? How do you know those were the parts he wrote?

If you take out the top 10 movies, Evan Almighty did pretty well....lmao.
 
Exactly what portion of the script did Frost write? Only the parts you disliked? How do you know those were the parts he wrote?

If you take out the top 10 movies, Evan Almighty did pretty well....lmao.

That shows the weekness after you get past the top 10. Frost was the only writer credited on the 1st movie. I'm not talking the 2nd movie, even thou he is listed. After the 1st movie, I'm suprised they let him within sniffing distance of the 2nd movie.
 
That shows the weekness after you get past the top 10. Frost was the only writer credited on the 1st movie.
That's not true. He shared the writing credits with Michael France who wrote the older, superior and more expensive draft.
 
Intresting little piece of trivia :

SPOILER: Tim Story once said that he would never have giant robots in any of his movies. In this film, Galactus, normally portrayed in the comics as something resembling a giant robot, is shown as a giant cloud.


http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0486576/trivia
 
That's not true. He shared the writing credits with Michael France who wrote the older, superior and more expensive draft.

Yeah the draft that was enough for 2 movies.


It was good, except for Van Damme, and Sue sounded smarter than Reed.
 
Here's a little trivia for the 1st movie from IMBD. All questions are hindsight questions.

Chris Columbus, Raja Gosnell and Peyton Reed were each attached as director at some point.

Question 1. Do you think they could have done any better, and who ?

Steven Soderbergh and Sean Astin were both interested in directing.

Question 2. Could either done better, and who ?

George Clooney and Brendan Fraser were considered for the part of Reed Richards.

Question 3. Better Reed or worse, and who ?

Paul Walker was considered for the part of Johnny Storm.

Question 4. Better Johnny, or worse ?

Julia Stiles, Kate Bosworth, Rachel McAdams, Scarlett Johansson, Elizabeth Banks, KaDee Strickland were considered for the role of Susan Storm/Invisible Woman.

Question 5. Better or worse, and who ?

Tim Robbins was considered for Dr. Doom.

Question 6. Better or worse Dr. Doom.

James Gandolfini was considered for the role of Ben Grimm/The Thing.

Question 7. Better or worse Thing/Ben Grimm ?

When Peyton Reed was attached as the director, Renée Zellweger was considered as Sue Storm/Invisible Woman

Question 8. Better or worse Sue Storm ?

The script was developed for over ten years. The final writer was Simon Kinberg, who worked on the movie throughout its production.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120667/trivia
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,268
Messages
22,076,833
Members
45,876
Latest member
Crazygamer3011
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"