Can Men be Trusted? With your Woman.

Can Men be Trusted? with your Woman.

  • No Men can not be trusted.

  • Yes Men can be trusted becuase your Woman isn't attractive/fat/toothless etc.

  • Your Woman can't be trusted around Men.

  • Your Woman can't be trusted around Woman.bisexual/Lezbian/sociopath etc.


Results are only viewable after voting.
That isn't a photo, stupid, its a snapshot of a cartoon.
I think you owe these men an apology.
legion.jpg
 
My grasp of natural selection is fine...its exactly what it needs to be to get me through life. Im no expert, but I dont need to be in order to survive.

All Ive said is that species adapt over time, passing down preferable traits to assist the success of their species.

That may be simple...but it IS natural selection.

Last time I checked this is not a science forum...so i feel no need to post a long diatribe explaining to everyone what natural selection is.

You are arguing justs to argue. I gave a simplified (again, this is a superhero forum, not a science forum) example...but I have Darwin to back me up. You just could not resist arguing against Darwin though and you very clearly state above that genetic drift is responsible, not natural selection.

You argued against natural selection. You in fact credited genetic drift instead of natural selection. Youre arguing just to argue.
 
Nope, they're definitely real.

oh yeah...i forgot...each word I type must include a definition.

The Legion Of Doom...supervillians....do not exist.

You can post a picture of a guy in a Lex Luthor costume, but you cannot post a picture of Lex Luthor. It is impossible, as he is a fictional character.



The mere fact that this stuff has to be spelled out to you really kind of makes you seem either stupid or argumentative.
 
Of all the strange places you could've gone when arguing...

Next on the agenda: Which is bigger - Katy Perry's left boob, or Katy Perry's right boob?
 
Women's left breasts are typically bigger based on from what I read and manual inspections.
 
Women's left breasts are typically bigger based on from what I read and manual inspections.

I had an ex whose left titage was quite noticeably bigger.

Heh! You read up on breasts?
 
Now where's Heretic when you need him? Why isn't he here telling us that women's breasts aren't to be trusted and they are getting bigger on the left because of natural selection?
 
Now where's Heretic when you need him? Why isn't he here telling us that women's breasts aren't to be trusted and they are getting bigger on the left because of natural selection?

When i have breasts in my face, i do not care which one might be slightly larger. I am a raging heterosexual male. Perhaps you guys look at women like scientific studies...thats where we disagree yet again.

However, I do appreciate that you are mocking the guy who has been correct on every argument in this thread. Nice work! Stop defending the scientifically and historically inaccurate stances you were on and just mock the guy who was correct. You're funny! Stupid, but funny!
 
Hey, hey, sounds like you may have some insecurity issues my friend. Do you want to talk about it?
 
When i have breasts in my face, i do not care which one might be slightly larger. I am a raging heterosexual male. Perhaps you guys look at women like scientific studies...thats where we disagree yet again.

However, I do appreciate that you are mocking the guy who has been correct on every argument in this thread. Nice work! Stop defending the scientifically and historically inaccurate stances you were on and just mock the guy who was correct. You're funny! Stupid, but funny!

I've been sort of hushed about this argument and I know that I have my fair share of stupid fights but sheesh.
 
oh yeah...i forgot...each word I type must include a definition.

The Legion Of Doom...supervillians....do not exist.

You can post a picture of a guy in a Lex Luthor costume, but you cannot post a picture of Lex Luthor. It is impossible, as he is a fictional character.



The mere fact that this stuff has to be spelled out to you really kind of makes you seem either stupid or argumentative.
Optimus Prime is real though.
http://thanfiction.blogspot.com/2006/08/national-guardsman-changes-name-to.html
 
I've been sort of hushed about this argument and I know that I have my fair share of stupid fights but sheesh.

Oh, I agree!

Do you have any idea how ridiculous I feel having to defend concepts that are accepted by 99% of the world??

Hey the world is round

No its not!

Um, sure it is...its been proven...look in a book.

HA HA, heretic is using evidence to back up his side. He must be insecure!

The mere fact that these arguments even happened is stupid. They wanted me to be wrong so bad that they defended concepts PROVEN to be wrong.

Its not a matter of me being right...its just a matter of saying "you dont believe grass is green??? Really???"
 
When i have breasts in my face, i do not care which one might be slightly larger. I am a raging heterosexual male. Perhaps you guys look at women like scientific studies...thats where we disagree yet again.

However, I do appreciate that you are mocking the guy who has been correct on every argument in this thread. Nice work! Stop defending the scientifically and historically inaccurate stances you were on and just mock the guy who was correct. You're funny! Stupid, but funny!

Calling me stupid is fine. It really is. Maybe if you eased down on the attitude people may actually take your points seriously.

You obviously have a point to prove on here, using any discussion as a vehicle for this point. Are you that insecure that you need to charge headlong into every discussion with such bitter vehemence, while without realising that your points will go unheard, drowned out by the noise of your hostility?

Lighten the **** up. Some people might actually be logging on to this site for a little fun and banter.
 
Calling me stupid is fine. It really is. Maybe if you eased down on the attitude people may actually take your points seriously.

You obviously have a point to prove on here, using any discussion as a vehicle for this point. Are you that insecure that you need to charge headlong into every discussion with such bitter vehemence, while without realising that your points will go unheard, drowned out by the noise of your hostility?

Lighten the **** up. Some people might actually be logging on to this site for a little fun and banter.

take my points seriously???

Dude, the points Im making are proven facts....and yet people are vehemently saying they are wrong. I have been called a Nazi, an abusive boyfriend...all for pointing out FACTS.

This isnt about me trying to prove any point...these are points I shouldnt have to prove. When I post a very simplified version of Charles Darwins concpet of natural selection, I expect it to NOT be attacked. What am i supposed to do? just say, okay, you know better than darwin???

My very simple points, accepted by almost everyone on earth...should have just been a footnote in this thread...yet people said my points were wrong and slandered me. yeah...Ive called people stupid for vehemently disagreeing with proven facts that are so widespread that I shouldnt HAVE to prove them again. meanwhile, Ive been called a fraud, an abuser, a nazi...I notice you overlooked all of those things...because once again...the guy with proven facts to back up his case has to be the one who is wrong.
 
Oh, I agree!

Do you have any idea how ridiculous I feel having to defend concepts that are accepted by 99% of the world??

Hey the world is round

No its not!

Um, sure it is...its been proven...look in a book.

HA HA, heretic is using evidence to back up his side. He must be insecure!

The mere fact that these arguments even happened is stupid. They wanted me to be wrong so bad that they defended concepts PROVEN to be wrong.

Its not a matter of me being right...its just a matter of saying "you dont believe grass is green??? Really???"
Evidence? All you've done is spout nonsense dripping with an ego so big it could kill a small galaxy, then when someone corrects you, on something even as simple as the definition of "betrayal" or "legally" you fly into rages and act as if you're the grandmaster of all knowledge. Sometimes you even take on their argument as if it were yours. It's really quite pathetic. You talk about how smart and truly awesome you are, meanwhile you so f---ing oblivious you don't even realize that we've all been conspiring to f--- with you for about the last 8 pages. Do you even realize how much we've been making fun of you? Do you catch all the mocking comments? All the sarcasm? Geez, you're about as sharp as a pile of satin pillows.
 
Your simple points have been accepted by almost everyone on Earth? Wow. Now if you could only unite the world in harmony, we'd be all set. :up:
 
Evidence? All you've done is spout nonsense dripping with an ego so big it could kill a small galaxy, then when someone corrects you, on something even as simple as the definition of "betrayal" or "legally" you fly into rages and act as if you're the grandmaster of all knowledge. Sometimes you even take on their argument as if it were yours. It's really quite pathetic. You talk about how smart and truly awesome you are, meanwhile you so f---ing oblivious you don't even realize that we've all been conspiring to f--- with you for about the last 8 pages. Do you even realize how much we've been making fun of you? Do you catch all the mocking comments? All the sarcasm? Geez, you're about as sharp as a pile of satin pillows.


MY STANCE HAS CHANGED????????

I still...to this very moment....stand behond every statement Ive made...

Most crimes are committed by people the victim trusts.

That is a FACT that has been deabted for several pages. You can make fun of me all day, but Im still right.

Animals adapt to their environments to assist the success of the species.

Thats CHARLES DARWIN. I know, you know better than Darwin.

My position has not ONE BIT...NOT AN ATOM!

So yeah...people are making fun of me because Charles darwin, national police statistics and myself are all wrong. You guys are geniuses.
 
take my points seriously???

Dude, the points Im making are proven facts....and yet people are vehemently saying they are wrong. I have been called a Nazi, an abusive boyfriend...all for pointing out FACTS.
You can't just say the word "FACTS" in all caps and expect what you say to magically be facts. Stating facts isn't casting a spell or anything.
This isnt about me trying to prove any point...these are points I shouldnt have to prove. When I post a very simplified version of Charles Darwins concpet of natural selection
A very wrong version of Charles Darwin's theory, as a matter of fact.
I expect it to NOT be attacked. What am i supposed to do? just say, okay, you know better than darwin???
No, although I do know what DNA is, and Darwin didn't. That aside though -- I don't think I know better than Darwin, I think I know better than you.
My very simple points, accepted by almost everyone on earth...should have just been a footnote in this thread...
Lemme guess, by 'everywhere on earth' you mean you and your thousand friends.
yet people said my points were wrong and slandered me. yeah...Ive called people stupid for vehemently disagreeing with proven facts
Yeah, you might start by stopping that practice...
...that are so widespread that I shouldnt HAVE to prove them again. meanwhile, Ive been called a fraud, an abuser, a nazi...I notice you overlooked all of those things...because once again...the guy with proven facts to back up his case has to be the one who is wrong.
Or you know, a guy who is combative and talks out his ass is wrong. One or the two.
 
And another thing...

This has nothing to do with ego.

I have repeatedly acted humble in this thread....not like shadowboxing, who knows better than Charles darwin and national crime statistics...what good is evidence when you have Shadowboxings opinion?????

It is not ego to say "The grass is green" and then argue your point when people say you are wrong.
 
take my points seriously???

Dude, the points Im making are proven facts....and yet people are vehemently saying they are wrong. I have been called a Nazi, an abusive boyfriend...all for pointing out FACTS.

This isnt about me trying to prove any point...these are points I shouldnt have to prove. When I post a very simplified version of Charles Darwins concpet of natural selection, I expect it to NOT be attacked. What am i supposed to do? just say, okay, you know better than darwin???

My very simple points, accepted by almost everyone on earth...should have just been a footnote in this thread...yet people said my points were wrong and slandered me. yeah...Ive called people stupid for vehemntly disagreeing with proven facts that are so widespread that I should HAVE to prove them again. meanwhile, Ive been called a fraud, an abuser, a nazi...I notice you overlooked all of those things...because once again...the guy with proven facts to back up his case has to be the one who is wrong.

I, on the other hand, have called you none of these things... yet you take the focus away from the discussion by making it personal with ME. I'm not going to call you dense, but surely you noticed that my post was light-hearted and did not call for me to be called 'stupid' in any way.

I have a couple of general rules on here:

1, If I'm having a heated discussion, I keep it about the subject, rather than focusing on the poster I am having said discussion with. Don't make it personal - attack the view, not the poster.

2, I don't post angry. If I get wound up by someone (and people will vouch for me on this: it virtually never happens) I take five, calm down, and put things in perspective.

Now if you don't mind, I'm going to take five :cmad:
 
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"