the new suit is slowly but surely growing on me
You described my motivations incorrectly. I corrected you. Is this unreasonable? If you had said "Saint believes religiously that whitespace is evil, and attempts to destroy it with his posts," or "Saint trained with ancient Lingual Masters," or "Saint is of lunar origins," I would I have corrected you on those, too.
And I "expressed my feelings" on your comments. Again: I don't understand what about this is unreasonable.
That you expect me to let accusations of silliness pass baffles me.
Because what they say warrants response. I'm not going to respond to half their points, I'm going to respond to all of them. The argument that ignores the opponents points is not a strong one. I slice up the posts because it is the most precise method of response.
This is a load of crap. I respond to what is said. If your posts are on topic, mine will be on topic. If your posts are about my posts being long, my words being "too big," or other nonsense you people bring up when you respond to me, then my posts will be about that.
This is curious. Here you correct implications I made about you (specifically that you would correct false implications, amusingly), and you apparently don't think it's unreasonable. However, when I corrected implications you made about me, you painted it as unreasonable.
I photoshopped the crap out of this to get the accurate colors, and remove the blue tint along with the text, and went with a Begins amber color lighting. The legs are rough because of the enormous amount of text.
Does the new belt appear less wide than the Begins version or it is just the way it rests on the new suit?
I reckon that for you, it has nothing to do what what's "right". It has everything to do with what "looks cool".
Those comments, specifically, are directed at the people who start these exchanges on my posting style. You didn't. You responded to the conversation that was already in progress; I can't fault you for being off-topic. What I fault you for is your implication that the off-topic posts are my fault, as was obviously your meaning (despite your attempt to mask it with generality).
No, it was a comment about the nature of my posts, masked by a thin veil of generality. Hence, my response.
I'm uncertain of what makes you think I'm angry.
edit:
Agreed. I wish I could write like Saint, The Guard, or regwec. Criticizing the way someone writes is stupid. No one is forcing you to read it and there is an ignore feature. Just my two cents.People need to let it go.
I don't see what the problem is...are some of you that illiterate that it hurts you to read Saint's or even Regwec's posts??
There really are only a small handfull of posters in the Batman boards, if not 3-4(maybe 5)that type like Saint or Regwec(for examplest
.
After reading through posts that are either nonsense or just repeats of something you've heard too many times to want to remember, it's actually a nice change to read some well thought out posts...and with points to them as well.
Not saying the rest of the posters don't have good posts...a lot of you do, I just don't see why people need to hate on others who don't like to use slang and like to use proper/correct English.
Hell yes to this. A winter-time Batmovie would rock so hard. It could look like Tim Sale's artwork come to life.
I'm done talking to you just so you know.
