Christopher Nolan's "Dunkirk" (July 21, 2017) - Part 3

Frankly, the sooner 3D dies as a thing entirely the better. It's a stupid, stupid gimmick that turns movies into pop up books. It's the cinematic equivalent of jangling keys in a cat's face to hold its attention.

Yup. The problem when it comes to comic book movies is that WB and Marvel want to be able to compete with each other. 3D means higher box office. If one decides to drop it, the other has the advantage. Beyond that, there is literally no reason to release these movies in 3D.
 
This IMAX dropping 3D news is music to my ears. I'm still bitter that Force Awakens didn't get a proper 70mm IMAX release. Glad I'll be able to make up for that with TLJ.
 
This IMAX dropping 3D news is music to my ears. I'm still bitter that Force Awakens didn't get a proper 70mm IMAX release. Glad I'll be able to make up for that with TLJ.

Yeah that sucked
, and Lincoln Square wasn't able to get the laser projector install finished until almost a year after it. Rogue One looked great in there.
 
Not an issue with Dunkirk since the movie is 2D only, but IMAX announced today they are pretty much giving up on 3D. Blade Runner will be 2D IMAX, Justice League same thing, and I assume same thing with Last Jedi/Infiniti War. It is about time they started giving us a 2D option.

Somewhere alone, deep in his private estate, James Cameron sheds a silent tear.
 
Correct. They will not fill the 1.43 giant IMAX screens like Dunkirk. They will fill the 1.9 LieMAX screens though. To fill a 1.43 IMAX screen, you have to shoot in 70mm IMAX film. IMAX has not developed a digital camera that shoots the 1.43 ratio yet.
That sucks, and they should.
 
This was even better the second time around.

And whoever said that we saw Hardy
shooting down the plane before the moment when the boats
are already there was wrong. We didn't see it before in the movie. Different plane.
 
This was even better the second time around.

And whoever said that we saw Hardy
shooting down the plane before the moment when the boats
are already there was wrong. We didn't see it before in the movie. Different plane.

Yes, I caught that too on my second viewing. I was specifically looking for that after reading that here.

Like I said earlier, I think a few might've just been overthinking the timelines.
 
Yes, I caught that too on my second viewing. I was specifically looking for that after reading that here.

Like I said earlier, I think a few might've just been overthinking the timelines.

Also it's amazing how many scenes give emotional weight to what happens later -
the French soldier who was so smart and careful and saved others from drowning drowns himself. And in particular the captivity of Farrier - we saw a soldier previously walk into the water, choosing death presumably over such awful fate
 
This IMAX dropping 3D news is music to my ears. I'm still bitter that Force Awakens didn't get a proper 70mm IMAX release. Glad I'll be able to make up for that with TLJ.

Oddly force awakens played on film IMAX in like 12 locations and somehow one of those locations was St. Louis. I was compelled to go just because it was so strange for St Louis to have something that Chicago and cities like New York didn't. Unfortunately it was a dome and it was like watching it through a fish eye lense. Anything horizontal became banana shaped.

Dunkirk is also playing there. I'm not sure why Nolan allows such things.
 
I hope the IMAX cameras for Avengers allow it to use the full IMAX aspect ratio like the scenes in Dunkirk. I want the whole screen to be filled with Marvel action.

I enjoyed Dunkirk. I think it's far from a perfect film, but I enjoyed it's pacing and the way it interspersed its narrative from different points in time and had them criss-crossing against one another. I thought that was pretty creative. Maybe not quite as creative and innovative as Memento did basically turning that Seinfeld episode device into a thriller, but I thought it was well done.

There were times I wish the movie had subtitles because it was sort of hard to understand what some of the characters were saying. Other times it was hard to keep track of certain characters and which ones were surviving by the skin of their teeth or dying.

One thing I didn't get was why Mr. Dawson refused the service of the British sailors for his vessel. I guess he still wanted to assist in the evacuation effort, but didn't want the Navy calling the shots? But then we saw tons of other civilian vessels that didn't appear to have any Navy men onboard, so did he commit some sort of heinous illegal act here? I just thought it was a weird moment to put in there, especially when there's no real payoff to him abandoning the Navy while they are onshore early on. There didn't appear to be any consequences to that act at all.

I really enjoyed the air and dogfight sequences. They had a very real, natural quality to them. You can tell Nolan does a lot of things in camera and they all look very real.

Hm that's a very good question. Anyone? The only thing I can think of is that he was clearly experienced and maybe thought he can do better - the way he guided Peter how to steer the boat when the enemy airplane was about to shoot
 
People always talk about Nolan's technical virtuosity and his emotional remoteness, but I don't feel like they've ever been laid side by side as starkly as Dunkirk. Honestly this is one of his lesser movies for me. My review:

http://www.jestersreviews.com/reviews/4122

I don't understand how Nolan is keeping characters at the distance especially in case of the ones played by Rylance, Branagh and Murphy here. And with Hardy we literally see all of his emotions right there, we didn't need words.
 
Frankly, the sooner 3D dies as a thing entirely the better. It's a stupid, stupid gimmick that turns movies into pop up books. It's the cinematic equivalent of jangling keys in a cat's face to hold its attention.

I don't recall which movie actually triggered the recent trend in 3D, but I have only seen 1 movie in which I think it being in 3D actually made my viewing experience more enjoyable & that was Avatar.

I've seen several others in 3D, but I often found that some of them hurt my eyes & gave me a headache so I generally aimed for 2D showings.
 
People always talk about Nolan's technical virtuosity and his emotional remoteness, but I don't feel like they've ever been laid side by side as starkly as Dunkirk. Honestly this is one of his lesser movies for me. My review:

http://www.jestersreviews.com/reviews/4122

I agree with your overall conclusion. A film can be technically perfect, but if I'm not invested it's not going to stick with me.
 
I don't recall which movie actually triggered the recent trend in 3D, but I have only seen 1 movie in which I think it being in 3D actually made my viewing experience more enjoyable & that was Avatar.

I've seen several others in 3D, but I often found that some of them hurt my eyes & gave me a headache so I generally aimed for 2D showings.

It was Avatar that started the trend
 
I don't recall which movie actually triggered the recent trend in 3D, but I have only seen 1 movie in which I think it being in 3D actually made my viewing experience more enjoyable & that was Avatar.

I've seen several others in 3D, but I often found that some of them hurt my eyes & gave me a headache so I generally aimed for 2D showings.

Avatar and specifically Cameron convinced the theater owners to pay out the wazoo for 3D projection. As a result, they started shoving the 3D format down the general public's throat even on movies that the public preferred 2D.

It has led to a very strong rejection of the format when the two could have co-existed a lot better if the theater managers would have been more careful with their approach on 3D and 2D showtimes.
 
Was wondering. How many true Imax 70mm theaters are left in the United States?
 
In an ideal world, more filmmakers would start to take advantage of the 70mm format and we would see an expansion of true IMAX theaters.
 
Navy Pier here in Chicago has one of the better ones.

large.jpg


I watched The Walk on this thing, and it was crazy.
 
Navy Pier here in Chicago has one of the better ones.

large.jpg


I watched The Walk on this thing, and it was crazy.

Unfortunately closed for renovations right now. Sucks for people in Chicago because Dunkirk is really the only movie of the year that has such a high percentage of 70mm IMAX footage.
 
I'm very happy to live 8 minutes away from a 70mm IMAX theater.
 
Avatar and specifically Cameron convinced the theater owners to pay out the wazoo for 3D projection. As a result, they started shoving the 3D format down the general public's throat even on movies that the public preferred 2D.

It has led to a very strong rejection of the format when the two could have co-existed a lot better if the theater managers would have been more careful with their approach on 3D and 2D showtimes.
It also led to ****** 3D conversions of movies that weren't even shot in 3D and should never have been presented in 3D in the first place.
 
Just got home from seeing it. Sadly, no Imax theater anywhere near me. But it was spectacular none the less. The sound was incredible, definitely the best thing about the movie, for me. Photography was amazing as well, will be a good battle between this and Blade Runner for the Oscar.

The beginning of the film was just perfect, the way it grabs you with the music, the tension and the sound is simply perfect. And I think that, even when it's one of his shortest movies, it's where Nola has let his scenes breathe the most.

Also, one question:

Was the plane pilot captured in the end? I didn't catch that, and if the timeline suggests anything i don't see how that happened.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"