Marvin
Avenger
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2003
- Messages
- 19,564
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 31
This was posted on collider.com
It includes a spoilery 2hr interview with Bay himself about the film and his thoughts on the industry and the push for 3D.
http://www.collider.com/2010/12/08/michael-bay-interview-transformers-dark-moon-edit-bay-visit/
It seems the initial point of the set visit was to address the rumors concerning the use of 3D in the film and it evolved into bay showing and telling much more due to how happy he is about the footage.
Steve has always been a bay enthusiast and Breaks(from aint it cool) less so, but their reactions and commentary seem genuinely positive when put in context. That being said Edit Bay reports are almost never bad. Take it for what you will. I for one think this is yet another positive sign as to the quality of this last film.
some excepts form the interview.
one of the most intersting parts personally
alot more at the source
a very promising read.
It includes a spoilery 2hr interview with Bay himself about the film and his thoughts on the industry and the push for 3D.
http://www.collider.com/2010/12/08/michael-bay-interview-transformers-dark-moon-edit-bay-visit/
It seems the initial point of the set visit was to address the rumors concerning the use of 3D in the film and it evolved into bay showing and telling much more due to how happy he is about the footage.
Steve has always been a bay enthusiast and Breaks(from aint it cool) less so, but their reactions and commentary seem genuinely positive when put in context. That being said Edit Bay reports are almost never bad. Take it for what you will. I for one think this is yet another positive sign as to the quality of this last film.
some excepts form the interview.
Bay: People were going on the Internet, saying we didnt do any 3D and theres all this talk, so were just trying to set the record straight, you know? So I dont know Im sure you guys will have questions.
(Bay shows us the teaser trailer)
Bay: What do you guys think of that?
Its a good sales pitch.
Bay: Is it? Im just trying to spin it a little bit. We have a more serious story this time and Im trying to make up for movie 2. (Laughter)
What do you think Neil Armstrong is going to have to say, or
Bay: Well, Buzz, hes involved in the picture.
In the modern day?
Bay: Yeah. If you can get through his stories while he pitches his books, you know, once you get past the two-hour sales pitch for me to direct this movie. I definitely know they landed on the moon now, because the way that old guy dont call him this but he is a stud of all studs to go up there. I said, because I wanted to know exactly about the Hasselblad cameras. And I said, When you brought back the cameras And he was, Brought back the cameras? We didnt bring **** back, we had to throw it all out! Its a junkyard up on the moon. We could barely get off! So I knew it was real, just by studying actors. So anyway It was cool to have him involved.
Bay: Depth, you cant really appreciate 3D because you need like 3 or 4 seconds, most people do, to really feel 3D. You cant really appreciate it when youre seeing like a quick teaser. Cause the shot is kind of, teaser cut length. But its actually changed my style on this movieIve got many more wides, the cameras not wild. So it does change my style a bit.
So why did you decide to use 3D on Transformers 3?
Bay: Contrary to opinion, the studio did not force me to do anything. They suggested, Would you be interested in 3D and Im like huh. I dont know, Ive had (Jeffrey) Katzenberg call me all the time, Jim (Cameron) call me all the timeYouve gotta do 3D, youve gotta do 3D, youve gotta do 3D. I visited Jim on Avatar and I just saw all the blue screen and the big cameras and Im like, This is so not me, so its kinda scary alright? Especially cause I do real world stuff, [as opposed to] the blue screen stage where its all air-conditioned, no dust and you can manufacture so much and youve got these big rigs that go with the umbilical cord into a lot of this brain power stuff. So we first investigated conversion companies, it took about 5 months of investigation, I mean literally breaking it down. We had them all come pitch to us, how they would do it, and so thought, Okay, well what if we spent a lot of time on conversion? You can do really successful conversion, but it just takes a lot of time. And then I kept thinking, God Ive gotta try these cameras and we got Jims space, his camera systems out there. And this is really hard for me cause Im a die-hard film guy, anamorphic old school lenses, and theres just nothing more beautiful than anamorphic lenses to me. So going digital was like, umpf, its just kinda crass for me and in close-up its terriblejust for me, thats for my taste. So we brought the camera systems out, and you hear horror stories on all these movies, they would do 20 shots, 10 shots a day, and I usually do 40-50 shots a day, and Im like Well this is bad on a, you know, $200 million movie, this is gonna just exponentially increase the shooting days, its a disaster.
Howd the cast like working with 3D?
Bay: They loved it. Cause you can keep the tape rolling. The actors like it cause you can do take after take and just keep the camera rolling. So you get in a rhythm, which is helpful. It just makes your memory storage go way up and all that.
I actually really enjoyed it. I was very curious how engaging or less engaging a dialogue scene would be. Theres stuff where its subtle stuff with Shia talking, and its just kinda cool, I mean you see a little thing but youre still focusing on him. I think its good for a third movie. We tried to learn from the second movie. On the second movie we got burned. We had a writers strike, we had to agree on a story in three weeks, and then we knew they were going on strike. It was a ****ed scenario all the way around, it wasnt fair to the writer, it wasnt fair to me, it wasnt fair to anybody. It was still an entertaining movie, but I think we failed on certain aspects. What we did with this movie is I think we have a much better script, and we got back to basics. I think theres some really cool action on this movie, theres some very cool conspiracy, theres great robot stuff in this that people were missing in the second one, youve got great robot conflict. So Im excited about this movie.
Its more serious. I got rid of the dorky comedy, I mean weve got two little characters, thats it, but the dorkiness is not there. Dork-free Transformers. Its much more serious. Its still entertaining, its big looking. I think its much more compelling, what we did, how we funneled our action, what weve got our characters doing, theyve got a lot more to do.
one of the most intersting parts personally
Would you say that the action set pieces are the biggest of your career?
Bay: My take on this movie was that I wanted to make the fighting a lot more personal. In the past two movies the cavalry has always came in, this time the cavalry isnt coming. Its black hawk down, a small group; theyre ****ed. It makes it more intimate. Its just different.
The government played a large role in the first two movies, now that transformers are out there and everyone knows about them, does the government still play a large role?
Bay: You feel it but you wont see it as much. Theres a national security advisor, but we dont spend a lot of time with that.
Can you say how many Autobots and Decepticons are on each team now?
Bay: No, but we have ones that we are highlighting now.
alot more at the source
a very promising read.