Momoa has plenty of physical attributes that are adequate for Conan
Which is where we disagree.
And its not about where the actor they pick comes from, but whether he looks the part. And I think the example you gave in the previous post is a better match for Conan than Momoa, who IMHO can pass for a Stygian or some of the other races in Howards world, but not a Cimmerian.
Im not even sure Momoa could pass for a teenage Conan as he was already so well built when he was a teenager. I dont buy that Momoa has the looks of somone who would break the neck of a bull or push boulders or physically overpower savages and other warriors - which is integral to the character. Howards text is very clear on this. He beats this into our heads over and over and over again.Conans physical awesomeness.
Were not talking about Batman here who has the help of the current technology or flexible armor and such, which can allow some flexiblity in casting. The actor has to look the part. Cimmerian features aside(and Im with those that the character should look celtic) Momoa doesnt have the "awe". NOTHING about Conan is common, hes exceptional in every way. Hes "the damnedest bastard that ever was"
I wouldnt buy Winstead as WonderWoman(a VERY popular choice here at SHH), I didnt buy Keaton as Batman and I wont buy Momoa as Conan. Hell I see guys in my gym 3 times a week who I would pick over Jason when it comes to he physical aspect of the character.
Alot of people say that Howards idea of well built would differ from now because we know so much more more about exercise than Howards time, but I call BS on that. Howard had plenty of things to draw inspiration from including many of the roman and greek statues, which has been around forever. I recently said this at the REH forums, but I was at the MET this past sunday and some of those statues are VERY well built, and could easily have inspired Howard when conjuring up the character.
Conan has to have the physical presence to walk among well build african warriors and have them be in awe of him. How many times in the stories did we hear people comment that theyd never seen the likes of Conan before.
I havent even started on how everyone involved doesnt seem to have a clue about the property theyre attempting to cash in on. Do these peopel understand Conan at all? It doesnt seem that way. Not from some of the reports weve gotten about the script and sch and this is my biggest beef. Momoa can work with acting coaches and such and Im glad hes reading Howards original stories - but all that doesnt mean a damn thing if the creative team doesnt even seem to understand the material theyre adapting.
This is why I find so much of this stuff so frustrating when dealing with characters I care about. Weve seen time and time again, that studio exes are idiots, who dont care abou the property they owe other than how it can line their pockets. The problem is the studio doesnt care. Conan is a property and they want to make money. 300 was popular, Sparcatus (a truly stupid and moronic show) has a following,etc. So whos the taget audience for this film? The people who have a real understanding and are fans, and more importantly CARE about the character is tiny compared to the general moviegoing audience who will go see this movie on a friday or saturday to kill 2 hours. THATS who theyre targeting for this film - so a faithful adapation be damned.And thats what I find so offensive.
eidt:
sorry for the rant, but after so long, I find this entire thing to be completely demoralizing, and I hate to see a character I love so much be treated like ****.