Piper Maru
Guest
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2012
- Messages
- 7,452
- Reaction score
- 5
- Points
- 31
Really? What if someone went to an airport and started telling everyone "i'm going to explode!"
would you assume he just had too much taco bel?
lmfao!
Really? What if someone went to an airport and started telling everyone "i'm going to explode!"
would you assume he just had too much taco bel?
Hyperbolic much?
How? Because not everything a crazy person says is a "direct threat".
For all we know, he was like "God told me to come pick the kids up and take them to the park".
Really? What if someone went to an airport and started telling everyone "i'm going to explode!"would you assume he just had too much taco bel?
I wouldn't assume anything. Just like I wouldn't assume this guy meant "I'm going to kidnap the children" when he said "God told me to take the children".
Is it cause for concern? Yes.
It is cause for sheer panic? No. Unless he was, you know, actually trying to kidnap the children. Doesn't seem like he was.
Hyperbolic much?
How? Because not everything a crazy person says is a "direct threat".
For all we know, he was like "God told me to come pick the kids up and take them to the park".
Well now we can say that. There was no way of knowing that at the time of the 911 call. After 40 minutes waiting for the cops, sure.
Because crazy people have never entered building with children intent on doing harm. Never. Jesus. This is one of the worst arguments I've read on here. And no, I'm not being hyperbolic. The point is, there's no reason that it should've taken a police officer 40 minutes to respond to any emergency call.
That's not my argument. I'm just saying...who the hell knows what he meant? He's a nutjob.
My argument is that it's not apparently that serious a situation based on what actually physically happened.
It's a matter of common sense. I'm fairly certain that after about 30 seconds, the parents and staff probably realized that the guy wasn't anywhere near making off with the kids, and that he was in fact, crazy.
So instead of erring on the side of caution, which is what every law-enforcement official has been taught to do, The Guard is basically saying "hey relax, take your time, cops. There's a 70% chance he's a harmless crazy guy who wants to take your children somewhere instead of a dangerous crazy guy." And if God's new messenger had decided at any time to draw a knife and slash the crap out of a few kids during that forty minute interval, who would we be blaming?
We would be blaming the guy who hurt them. Obviously the law enforcement would have and did fail the people in this instance, but I wouldn't be looking for cops blood if the man had hurt the kids.
Okay, well obviously you primarily blame the knife-wielding maniac, but in the same way you can blame poor engineers when a building collapses during an earthquake or poor security that didn't prepare properly for a terrorist attack, you can blame poor cops for a crappy response time that costs lives. I thought my point was pretty simple and universally acknowledged. When there's a deadly failure due to incompetence or indifference, heads roll.
Because crazy people have never entered building with children intent on doing harm. The point is, there's no reason that it should've taken a police officer 40 minutes to respond to any emergency call.
So instead of erring on the side of caution, which is what every law-enforcement official has been taught to do, The Guard is basically saying "hey relax, take your time, cops. There's a 70% chance he's a harmless crazy guy who wants to take your children somewhere instead of a dangerous crazy guy." And if God's new messenger had decided at any time to draw a knife and slash the crap out of a few kids during that forty minute interval, who would we be blaming?
He wasn’t, though. He didn’t apparently have a gun. He walked in and said “God told me to take the children”.Also, it's not like there hasn't been a huge amount of crazy folks running around shooting people in the last few months. So anyone going into a school or daycare saying they were told by god to "take care of the children" there wouldn't cause a massive freak out or anything. If he was one of those crazy ******* with a gun, then what? "Whoops, shift change. Sorry all your kids got murdered because we were too ****ing lazy to even send a car out."
The crazy ones are the ones you ought to be most worried about. Most of the mass shootings that have happened recently were committed by...wait for it...crazy people.
So tell us again how it's "a matter of common sense" that crazy people aren't a danger to children. Not all people with mental problems are inherently dangerous, but enough of them are and have committed violent crimes, including crimes against young children, that the parents and staff of that daycare were acting reasonably when they confronted the man and called police. Arguing otherwise is nonsensical in the extreme
Okay, well obviously you primarily blame the knife-wielding maniac, but in the same way you can blame poor engineers when a building collapses during an earthquake or poor security that didn't prepare properly for a terrorist attack, you can blame poor cops for a crappy response time that costs lives.
None of whom wandered into a school and calmly explained that a deity told them to take the children, and without opening fire.
I never said that its a matter of common sense that crazy people arent a danger to children...where the hell are you getting that?
I never said they werent acting reasonably when they confronted the man and called the police.
All Ive said, if you pay attention to the context of my argument, is that nothing about what actually happened IN THIS SITUATION suggests this guy was actually in the process of/going to be able to kidnap or harm the children.
Thats all.
I feel like it says he said "God told me to take the children". Not kidnap them. And it's a moot point, because the parents obviously didn't buy his story. Was he actually kidnapping them? No? Then what's the big deal?
What do you suppose "take" means?
What do you suppose "take" means?
I havent said otherwise.
No I haven't said anything remotely like that. Haven't said anything that should lead you to believe that.
Hopefully, if that happened, we would blame the guy who slashed the crap out of a few kids. Since hes, you know, the one who hypothetically did it.
He wasnt, though. He didnt apparently have a gun. He walked in and said God told me to take the children.
A "huge amount"?
Yes, its cause for concern, as I've already said. Level heads prevailed, though, because it seems none of the children were taken or kidnapped or any of that.
None of whom wandered into a school and calmly explained that a deity told them to take the children, and without opening fire.
I never said that its a matter of common sense that crazy people arent a danger to children...where the hell are you getting that?
I never said they werent acting reasonably when they confronted the man and called the police.
All Ive said, if you pay attention to the context of my argument, is that nothing about what actually happened IN THIS SITUATION suggests this guy was actually in the process of/going to be able to kidnap or harm the children.
Thats all.
Not really. You blame the people who commit the crime. Thats what costs lives.
The cops could very well be busy, or there could be some type of communication issue.
Yes, youd like to hope they would be able to respond quickly, but you cannot blame cops for someone elses actions.
Cops showing up late isnt what caused people to suffer in your hypothetical scenario.