Did O.J. Do It?

[WorthyStevens]

Yep, he did it. The reason he was found not guilty was because the Dream Team punched so many holes through the prosecution's case.

 

[AhabTheArab]

prosecution was straight up ******ed. i swear a team of law students from a community college could have put him away.

 

[Nell2ThaIzzay]

Yes, he did it. Unfortunately the police ****ed up and the prosecution ****ed up and created reasonable doubt. Therefore he should not have been convicted. The court made the right call. Whats the saying? "I'd rather see 100 guilty men go free than 1 innocent man convicted."

And on a side note...murderer or not, he is still hillarious in the Naked Gun movies.

agreed.

i was a supporter of o.j. back in the day, but i think it's pretty clear now that he did it.

the problem is though... the police and prosecution DID mess up, especially with mark furman planting evidence, and he should have been found not guilty, as he was, because it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

 

[Nell2ThaIzzay]

Do I believe O.J. murdered Nicole and Ron? No, I really don't. But let me clarify what I mean by not doing it. I don't believe he went out of his way to kill them, in my opinion, I believe that he was caught up in some sort of money deal that involved shady individuals and these said individuals kill for their dollar obviously.

I believe whoever he was involved with killed Nicole and Ron as a message to him. Now whether or not this is true or implied this is just all speculation on my part.

But no, I don't believe he killed them, although I do believe he knows who did it and is afraid to say who really did it.

Just out of curiousity, why does a civil suit prove he did it? Just because he was found liable doesn't really prove he actually murdered two people. Not trying to start a flame war but I'm trying to understand the whole "civil suit" argument.

i'm curious as to why you think this, last sunrise. care to elaborate?

 

[Silicon Surfer]

Whether he did it or not it most definitely did not happen the way the police said it did. First of all he supposedly acted alone yet two people were hacked up in a very painful way without making any sound that was audible to the neighbors on what they said was a quiet night. Ron Goldman was younger and fitter than O.J. and could have simply outrun him. The police tried to introduce into evidence bloody socks. A blood expert said that the blood was pressed into the socks and the stain was identical on both sides of the sock. The evidence was not permitted. The police entry video into O.J.'s room was shown on t.v. and the section of floor where the bloody socks were supposedly found was visible. The socks were not there. The police would seem to have manufactured the evidence. There also was no time for him to have committed the murders, drove home, cleaned up and rid himself of the evidence in time to catch his flight. News reports said that all the guys who worked at the restaurant where Goldman worked were either dead or missing. There was also a news report that said that a crime with a similar m.o. was committed while O.J. was in jail.

 

[Masamune]

Elvis did it.

 

[The-Dark-Knight]

5 people actually think he's innocent? Does OJ have much of a career in the US these days?

 

[VICTORVONDOOMX]

The scientific blood evidence eliminated everyone on the planet Earth as the murderer except O.J. Simpson, but 12 ignorant jurors and 2 inept DA's couldn't help the public out at all...

 

[Halcohol]

It's been said before, but: of course OJ did it.

 

[The Chairman]

I'm surprised there are actually people who think he's innocent.

 

[ShadowBoxing]

It's actually not really a matter of opinion. O.J., for better or worse, is innocent.

 

[The-Dark-Knight]

I'm surprised there are actually people who think he's innocent.

Thats what i thought, Shadow how can you think he never did it?

 

[VICTORVONDOOMX]

It's actually not really a matter of opinion. O.J., for better or worse, is innocent.

No. He was adjudged not guilty in a criminal court. He was in no way innocent.

 

[ShadowBoxing]

No. He was adjudged not guilty in a criminal court. He was in no way innocent.

...and in this country you are innocent until proven guilty. They did not prove him guilty, therefore, he is not innocent of her murder. It's not a hard concept to grasp.

 

[ShadowBoxing]

Thats what i thought, Shadow how can you think he never did it?

Unless you have public records to prove otherwise, he is innocent. There really is nothing more to say on the matter.

 

[Santa-Claus]

Sorry but i dont think just because a jury says your innocent then your innocent. Pedophiles, rapists, murderers walk free because the justice system is messed up. They may say he's innocent but he clearly murdered those people, he even wrote a book saying 'if i did it' the guys wanting to admit he did it so bad.

I understand what your saying, but he may have been found innocent but he is in no way innocent.

 

[VICTORVONDOOMX]

...and in this country you are innocent until proven guilty. They did not prove him guilty, therefore, he is not innocent of her murder. It's not a hard concept to grasp.

In this country, you are legally innocent until proven guilty. OJ isn't innocent. He isn't an innocent. Guilty people are determined to be legally innocent all the time. It doesn't change their guilt. Not a difficult concept at this end, either.

 

[The Chairman]

It's actually not really a matter of opinion. O.J., for better or worse, is innocent.

Um, okay. It's blatantly obvious he did it.

 

[ShadowBoxing]

I understand what your saying, but he may have been found innocent but he is in no way innocent.

If there was no way he was innocent, then he'd be guilty. Simple as that. He was let off because the prosecution could not make a good case against him. If you think that you could've done a better job then maybe you should be going to law school. However, I am not going to call him guilty when that is simply not the case.

 

[ShadowBoxing]

Um, okay. It's blatantly obvious he did it.

Really? Tell that to the people who prosecuted him, I'm sure they will tell you that blatantly wasn't the case.

 

[The Chairman]

Really? Tell that to the people who prosecuted him, I'm sure they will tell you that blatantly wasn't the case.

Um, the prosecution were kind of stupid.

And it's obvious. Everything from the crime scene to the way O.J. goes about it says otherwise. Innocent people don't write books about how they'd hypothetically commit the crime they were accused of committing.

He was legally innocent, not personally or morally.

 

[ShadowBoxing]

In this country, you are legally innocent until proven guilty. OJ isn't innocent. He isn't an innocent. Guilty people are determined to be legally innocent all the time. It doesn't change their guilt. Not a difficult concept at this end, either.

Unfortunately, for you, that's not the case.

 

[ShadowBoxing]

Um, the prosecution were kind of stupid.

No not really. They were all very high profile lawyers who had very successful careers.

And it's obvious.

Again, I'm sure the prosecution would love to hear that...but I'm pretty sure after what they went through they'd tell you otherwise.

Everything from the crime scene to the way O.J. goes about it says otherwise. Innocent people don't write books about how they'd hypothetically commit the crime they were accused of committing.

What do you want me to tell you? Apparently in this case an innocent person did.

 

[VICTORVONDOOMX]

Unfortunately, for you, that's not the case.

WTFE.
You mean when my buddy went into and unarmed man's yard with a .38 and the expressed desire to kill him and then did so... and the jury (idiots) ruled this murder to be self defence, that the Jury's ruling actually changed reality? Did their verdict make him retroactively innocent? Of course not. They got it wrong. He was just as guilty... merely legally innocent.

 

[The Chairman]

Um, okay. Just because a group of 12 people found him innocent (no thanks in part to the prosecution bungling the case), doesn't mean he's innocent. Innocent until proven guilty doesn't mean he's innocent. It just means he cannot be legally persecuted by federal lawmakers until the courts find him guilty.