mightiest_mortal
Much Mightier than thou!
- Joined
- May 27, 2001
- Messages
- 4,681
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 31
I can debate.. i even used Hobbits!
right... you keep telling yourself that...that's a lie. I watch evolutionary documentary's all of the time, and they always talk about Lucy. I have seen Lucy with my own two eyes at the muesuem in Chicago just two years ago. Lucy is austroplith, and her earlobes are too low to be a chimpanzee, and she has a pelvis designed to support the weight of the organs being above it, instead of in front of it.
Goku had very close monkey lineage.right... you keep telling yourself that...

I hate that show...Goku had very close monkey lineage.
Are you doubting Goku, dOode![]()
This thread started with claiming whales have vestigal 'legs' when infact that is a lie. Those bones are connected to their reproductive organs, and they need it to reproduce.
That's a lie that's been disproven for years, but it's still in the text books. Infact, all the 'evidence' for evolution are lies.
Learn more here
http://www.blueletterbible.org/audio_video/hovind_kent/creation/creation_template.html
So this is kinda like your understanding of space-time in the last thread you made...which is non-existent.This thread started with claiming whales have vestigal 'legs' when infact that is a lie. Those bones are connected to their reproductive organs, and they need it to reproduce.
That's a lie that's been disproven for years, but it's still in the text books. Infact, all the 'evidence' for evolution are lies.
Learn more here
http://www.blueletterbible.org/audio_video/hovind_kent/creation/creation_template.html

So this is kinda like your understanding of space-time in the last thread you made...which is non-existent.
Let me ask you: how does Evolution work?
This thread started with claiming whales have vestigal 'legs' when infact that is a lie. Those bones are connected to their reproductive organs, and they need it to reproduce.
That's a lie that's been disproven for years, but it's still in the text books. Infact, all the 'evidence' for evolution are lies.
Learn more here
http://www.blueletterbible.org/audio_video/hovind_kent/creation/creation_template.html

Okayit doesn't.
lol
let me ask you, how does my hair grow green flowers and lolipops?
it doesn't.
duh
What does it even meeeeeeeeean
What does it even meeeeeeeeean
![]()
Okay
How is Evolution supposed to work?
If you're going to argue against it I'd expect you'd to have an understanding of the theory to begin with.
This thread started with claiming whales have vestigal 'legs' when infact that is a lie. Those bones are connected to their reproductive organs, and they need it to reproduce.
That's a lie that's been disproven for years, but it's still in the text books. Infact, all the 'evidence' for evolution are lies.
Learn more here
http://www.blueletterbible.org/audio_video/hovind_kent/creation/creation_template.html

You are asking me to explain a 'theory' (if u can call it that) that has 0 scientific evidence behind it, and no logical basis for it in reality, because it defies the 2nd law of thermodynamics; that all things tend towards disorder and chaos.
It is impossible for something to grow in complexity, without an intellegence literally constructing the construction.
So to say a bunch of soup one day became alive and eventually evolved into a human is simply impossible, and a lie.
Firstly, it has never been observed that any creature in recorded history has grown in complexity. That has never happened. So that is strike 1.
Secondly, no species has ever given birth to a seperate species, which evolution requres, because you believe bananas and dogs had a common ancestor; soup. That's strike 2.
Thirdly, the world is only around 6 thousand years old, not giving the evolutionary process the supposed 'millions and billions' of years it claims to require. So if I can prove the Earth is less than 6 thousand years old, your theory is dead. And I will do so now.
When USA landed on the moon for the first time, they assumed there would be billions of years worth of dust collected on the surface. They imagined that their space-shuttle would sink through the dust layers and be swallowed by the dust. When they landed, it turned out there was only an inch or so of dust on the moon. They then imagined perhaps the moon wasnt collecting dust at the rate they imagined. So they attempted to measure the rate in which the moon was collecting dust, and to their surprise it was actually collecting dust, still. They did this by putting a plate down, and allowing it to collect dust. Then they measured the dust collection rate. When they applied that to the amount of dust on the moon, it couldnt have possibly been collecting dust for more than 6 thousnd yrs.
More interesting still, the moon is actually moving away from the Earth. Some people argue that the Earth just acquired the moon as it passed by in space, and the Earths gravity caught it 6 thousand years ago. If this was true however, the moon would be moving towards the earth, to our doom. This is not the case, it is proven that the moon is moving away from the earth. More interesting still, space is a frictionless void so an object in motion, regardless of its size, will remain at the same speed it is going until it encounters resistance. So, if the moon has been moving away from the earth for billions of years at its current rate, it would be so far away from the earth we wouldnt even be able to see it. This proves the moon has only been moving away from the earth for a short time.
Comets are made of rock and ice, and as they travel through space, they lose their mass. When you see a comet, you see a tail behind them, that is the ice and rock flying off the body of the comet. Even the largest comets only have a life span of the a few thousand years, because they are constantly losing their mass until they are no more. If the universe was billions of years old, there would be no comets.
The sun loses 1 200 000 tons of mass every second. If the sun is billions of years old, and you applied that rate of consumption for a lifespan of billions of years, the sun would have been large enough to swallow the earth, clearly not possible.
So, if the earth and the sun and the moon and the universe is only 6 thousand years old, that proves evolution isnt true. Evolutionists refuse to believe that the earth is any younger than billions of years old, regardless of the facts presented above. Evolutionists believe we came from goo, to the zoo, to you. This is not true.
If you want to learn the truth about where you come from, please go here and realize your life actually has value http://www.blueletterbible.org/audio_video/hovind_kent/creation/creation_template.html