• Secure your account

    A friendly reminder to our users, please make sure your account is safe. Make sure you update your password and have an active email address to recover or change your password.

  • Xenforo Cloud has scheduled an upgrade to XenForo version 2.2.16. This will take place on or shortly after the following date and time: Jul 05, 2024 at 05:00 PM (PT) There shouldn't be any downtime, as it's just a maintenance release. More info here

Discussion: Guns, The Second Amendment, NRA - Part II



Uvalde parents are suing gunmaker, Meta and ‘Call of Duty’ manufacturer​

The lawsuits allege the companies are responsible for pushing the Robb Elementary shooter to acquire an AR-15 style weapon.



They accuse the companies of partnering to promote and create content designed to glorify combat, gun violence and killing that effectively trained the teenage shooter before he killed 19 students and two teachers in one of the deadliest school shooting in U.S. history.

"There is a direct line between the conduct of these companies and the Uvalde shooting," said Josh Koskoff, an attorney for the families. "This three-headed monster knowingly exposed him to the weapon, conditioned him to see it as a tool to solve his problems and trained him to use it."

According to the lawsuits, the Uvalde shooter had played versions of "Call of Duty" since he was 15, including one that allowed him to effectively practice with the version of the rifle he used at the school.

The lawsuit against the game company said it has created a hyper-realistic game where "although the killing is virtual, the weapons are authentic — they are designed to perfectly imitate their real-life counterparts in look, feel, recoil and accuracy."

Instagram does little to enforce its rules rules that ban marketing firearms and harmful content to children, the lawsuit said.

The gun company scored a "marketing coup" with its weapon featured in the game, the attorneys for the family said.

"Simultaneously, on Instagram, the shooter was being courted through explicit, aggressive marketing. In addition to hundreds of images depicting and venerating the thrill of combat, Daniel Defense used Instagram to extol the illegal, murderous use of its weapons," the families' attorneys said in a statement.

The Uvalde shooter opened an online account with Daniel Defense before his 18th birthday, and purchased the rifle as soon as he could, the lawsuit said.

I don’t know what level of culpability is actually here and these lawsuits are often tossed but it puts the spotlight on marketing tactics once again.

Unlike 20-30 years ago, large social media companies and gaming platforms have the capability to do more to protect children.
 
Last edited:

Uvalde parents are suing gunmaker, Meta and ‘Call of Duty’ manufacturer​

The lawsuits allege the companies are responsible for pushing the Robb Elementary shooter to acquire an AR-15 style weapon.





I don’t know what level of culpability is actually here and these lawsuits are often tossed but it puts the spotlight on marketing tactics once again.

Unlike 20-30 years ago, large social media companies and gaming platforms have the capability to do more to protect children.
If this is true then I hope the parents win big money. Geez.....
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"