Lol, in that is funny. I apologize in advance for the perhaps confusing verbosity of the below to some, yet perhaps not - I do not know.
To me here's the thing about reality distortion fields. One views oneself as moderate, the opposition views that same as either an extremist and on that same hand the reverse is seen as true with the opposition seen as the extremist. Same goes for the freedom fighter and the terrorist - "one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter" as the saying goes, look to the American Revolution for example. Basically the only true moderation I believe is through being able to see and acknowledge that at any one moment in time one is seen as both the positive and the negative force depending on who is asked. Personally, I view holding one's opinion and saying they respect the other's opinion (as I always opt to do so, since I am not one who likes to view my views as anything close to resembling fact) despite not agreeing with it is moderation and those who must absolutely have their opinion be seen as fact by all or at least the opposition (as if to say disagreeing party) is extremism. Then again that is my own personal reality distortion field and I may very well be wrong despite believing that I am right. And I believe, although, I might be wrong that one will call me out for saying as such with stating in variable words "you are wrong, I am right." You may very well be, hypothetically, I accept and welcome that difference between us(or the disagreeing parties whatever the course may be doing so as well, which is actually increasingly and sadly rare these days). Whereupon I see, myself, as moderation for doing so although you are guaranteed to have those who disagree with that seeking to hold opinion as fact and they are more than open to do so as well. In that fact, it is less I see myself as an extremist rather in knowing and acknowledging those who don't agree with me will view me in the negative and vice versa. Whereupon they are more than welcome to do so as that comes from one's very human nature as if to say it's a natural part of life and disconcent.
I do readily acknowledge in being radical since I do know many may not align with me, and they are more than welcome to do so, it is something that I actually encourage.
As said, sorry for the verbosity of the above. It's old English. Watching American Revolution film scenes then writing the above (merely coincidental) the verbosity was of transference.