www.independent.co.uk
Pretty much. Awful.The Supreme Court just gave insurrectionists a free pass to overthrow democracy
In a split ruling, five conservative justices decided that any candidate who tries to overthrow the government can still get elected, as long as they have the support of Congress. Alex Woodward reports
They did. I'm sure this is something that will be looked back on in the history books as signs of a corrupt Court.US supreme court ‘erred badly’ with Trump ruling, leading US historian says
Allan Lichtman, who has correctly predicted outcome of every US election since 1984, disagrees with decision on Colorado ballotwww.theguardian.com
Yeah, too bad they didn't do the right thing.
That's still quite late.
Too close to November.
www.rollingstone.com
www.newsweek.com
Bought and paid for.The Supreme Court Is Tilting 2024 in Trump's Favor, One Decision at a Time
Trump’s Supreme Court supermajority didn’t help him steal the election in 2020 — but now, justices are laying down his 2024 victory path.
With three Trump appointed judges on the bench? Definitely.
www.usatoday.com
www.nbcnews.com
Maybe if they weren't so biased they wouldn't get so many threats.Supreme Court wants $19.4 million in new funds to protect the justices and their homes
The Supreme Court's request to Congress for an additional $19.4 million comes as threats against judges have increased in recent years.
thehill.com
thehill.com
www.texastribune.org
www.vox.com
Yeah, this doesn't seem right to me. If you don't like drag shows, don't go. Why do they have to be outright banned?The Supreme Court’s puzzling decision to allow the government to ban drag shows, explained
This is a serious blow to the First Amendment and a victory for a notoriously anti-LGBTQ judge.
