They show other Disney Renaissance movies all the time. I've seen Hunchback, Tarzan, Beauty and the Beast, Lilo and Stich, etc on their quite a lot. Ironically, the one film that they DON'T show often is Little Mermaid. They've also started showing Pixar films as well.wait......they're showing Little Mermaid on the Disney Channel??!!
you mean.........and actual Disney animated classic on the Disney Channel??!!
and not the other crap they normally show??
![]()
They show other Disney Renaissance movies all the time. I've seen Hunchback, Tarzan, Beauty and the Beast, Lilo and Stich, etc on their quite a lot. Ironically, the one film that they DON'T show often is Little Mermaid. They've also started showing Pixar films as well.
Do you guys think John Lassenter was shifting his attention towards Disney Animation so much that Pixar got hurt in the process? Or is it the opposite, where John was so distracted by Pixar leaving Disney Animation with more freedom? Kinda like how back in the 90's, the execs were focusing so much on Pocahontas as the priority, and saw The Lion King as the B-Team movie. Irony.
Speaking A and B Teams, starting in 2016, Disney Animation will release TWO animated films per year, a model that Pixar will adapt in 2015, with Dreamworks in 2014. Keep in mind that every OTHER year, Disney Animation will release the films. (2014, 2016,2018) while Pixar will TRY to continue annually (except for 2014).
How will that affect the Oscar noms*? There will be causalities. There will be 'VS' debates. And if you think about it, it'll wear each studio pretty thin, especially Pixar who is experiencing some stumbling blocks. Normal, but it's sign that they need to slow it down and regroup. Personally, I think Pixar will soon go back to one movie a year if The Good Dinosaur doesn't work out. Too much on one plate.
*I like the idea of having two animation categories: One for the Americans; and the other for Foreign. It'll give amazing studios like Ghibli a chance to win something.
This was a thoughtfully made movie. Strong and likeable female leads, a good song in Let It Go, witty comic relief (the good kind), eye-catching aesthetics with the ice sculptures, no knight-in-shining armor cliches...even the message was a good one. I only had two problems with it- the shot sequences and the twist towards the end. They were a little too conservative with the shots, so there's a lot of scenes that play out "medium two shot, over the shoulder, two shot, OTS, repeat, repeat, scene." So it made some of the dialogue heavier parts feel too familiar. As for the twist:
It's cool that Prince Hans wasn't her true love. Still, why did he need to go so far in the other direction? I was really interested in seeing how they would maturely handle his unrequited love after he kept promise to protect her people, and instead, he went mustache twirlingly evil. Although they made his turn play into a rather sweet cure for Anna's condition, I was disappointed they felt a need for a villain for this when there was a natural preexisting conflict between Anna, Elsa's company, and those who treated her like a monster.
Besides those two nitpicks, it's otherwise one of the best Disney films I've seen in a while. Same goes for the Get a Horse short before it. Good stuff all around.
wasn't Katzenberg the guy who wanted to cut "Part of Your World" from Little Mermaid?![]()
I thought you'd enjoy that.![]()