Octoberist
point blank
- Joined
- May 13, 2005
- Messages
- 46,465
- Reaction score
- 17
- Points
- 33
Dracula in the novel was just a hardcore villain who had very minimal lines.
Dracula in the novel was just a hardcore villain who had very minimal lines.
Daybreakers kind of sucked...

t:Well, nowadays vampires are being portrayed as teen heartthrobs (Twilight) or misunderstood do-gooders (True Blood). I guess the people behind Dracula wanted to continue this trend.
Thank god for 'Daybreakers'.
Yeah, just rented it from Netflix this week. So far, I'm REALLY enjoying it!
Daybreakers was awesome.

I agree! I'm halfway through it so far, and it's a really cool story! Stephanie Meyer better be taking notes: THIS IS HOW YOU DO A VAMPIRE MOVIE!![]()

Just once I wish they would do a faithful adaptation of Bram Stoker's novel. Forget this prequel ****. Forget this Van Helsing ****. Just do the ****ing book properly!![]()
where he was just a force of evil and only had a few lines in one chapter? PLUS a nifty mustache? Seriously, the book is wonderful and Dracula was almost Jaws like. He pops in and out of the book but has only a few lines here and there.
Uh, didn't Francis Ford Coppola DO THAT already? I mean, Keanu Reeves aside, it WAS very faithful to the book and to the infamous rumors about Vlad The Impailor back when Stoker wrote it! Plus, Gary Oldman was FANTASTIC and creepy as ****, despite his initial Palpatine-esque look at the beginning.
Well, I'm out.
And screaming like a woman.i guess we should prepare to see dracula to make a yelling face a lot.