FINAL COMMENTS
This is probably my final post on this battle, unless Aristotle raises some drastically new points. I've got too much real life work right now to go back and forth on this forever. I think we've both made our points and now we're more or less finding slightly different ways to repeat the same arguments. At some point one of us has to say, "OK, I've said all I needed to say," and it might as well be me.
I'm going to try to respond to Aristotle's latest posts, but rather than quoting line by line and making this longer than it needs to be, let me just run through the key battles again and respond to his points in the process of summing up my point of view.
Flash vs. Zoom
Aristotle keeps saying Flash would have the advantage on Zoom because he's more experienced with his powers. He also seems to think Zoom is an idiot -- which is not true, he was an FBI criminal profiler for pete's sake -- but I'll admit Flash is more experienced. So which counts for more -- Zoom's advantage in speed or Flash's advantage in experience? Well, if you actually
read Blitz (the specific point in time I'm pulling Zoom from), he has a pretty
drastic advantage on Flash until Flash gets powered up by some other speedsters, and even then they're basically even. If you
didn't read it, here's a
review. Here's the key point: "not only can the new Zoom match Wally stride for stride, he can literally run rings around him". And Aristotle admits Bart is no faster than Wally.
If Wally has faired better in other encounters with Zoom -- I'm not really sure which Aristotle's referring to, since he hasn't cited a specific story -- maybe it's because Zoom was mentally not the same after colliding with his own time warp at the end of Blitz (there seemed to be some evidence of this, such as his changed speech patterns), in which case it's irrelevant to the version I have.
Or maybe Wally came up with some clever strategy to beat Zoom, but if so,
I sure don't know what it is and it doesn't appear Aristotle does either. He says without examples:
If Zoom had an advantage in a one-on-one with Flash, he wouldn't lose every one-on-one with Flash he's ever had in the comics. He's not smart enough. Flashes have always beat him.
Again, I don't know what the hell he's talking about, because Zoom kicked Flash's ass in Blitz until Flash got a temporary powerup -- one Aristotle's Flash doesn't have. If Flash has demonstrated some clever way of beating Zoom,
why didn't Aristotle use it in his writeup? Instead, he had Flash rely on a method of beating speedforce speedsters (vibrating bullet), which I've argued
wouldn't work on Zoom for several reasons (couldn't amp Batman's reflexes enough, couldn't make the bullet fast enough, Zoom wouldn't try to phase through it, etc.)
Now, Aristotle has backed off his own idea, and is trying to say
my strategy for fighting Zoom (flash grenade) should have beaten him. First of all, saying your
opponents strategy for your team would win you the fight isn't much of an argument. (And how does he say this while still claiming I underwrote his characters?) But second, his arguments is that it should have incapacitated Zoom because "flash bangs incapacitate trained marines". By that reasoning, it should have incapacitated the Flash too, since he was
holding the damn thing in his hand. Obviously in my writeup I didn't have it as
that powerful a grenade (so Flash
would be able to shield himself), just a burst of light to stun Zoom long enough that Flash
thought he could get in a finishing blow -- and Zoom proved a little to quick.
Again, saying people should vote for you because
I used your team effectively makes no sense.
Zatanna vs. Doomsday
This is maybe the most important one, because if Zatanna goes down there's no one on his team stopping Doomsday.
First, Aristotle gives Zatanna the chance to get an attack in first. He justifies this by saying "she can fly, and she comes at him from the air." First, even if she's looking down on him from far above, Doomsday could leap and close the distance faster than she can blink. Furthermore, Zatanna sill has to get close to Doomsday to do anything as complicated as the mind-control attack he has her use (name one time she's done it when she was far away -- I'm pretty sure with Dr. Light she was actually touching his head, certainly at least close-up eye contact.) And if she gets close, Doomsday pounds the crap out of her at superspeed, before she can speak a spell.
Deathstroke is fast enough to hit her before she can speak, and Doomsday is
way faster.
Furthermore, her flight advantage is
totally negated by the fact that Darkchylde can teleport Doomsday right to her. Aristotle says "she ports him into the air, he falls right back down." Um, except she can port him within arms length of Zatanna, and he punches far faster than he falls or than she can defend. Or, he takes a flying leap through a portal and comes out flying straight at Zatanna faster than she can possibly block. Or she ports him right over Zatanna and he lands on her and tears her apart faster than she can react. Of course Aristotle gets around all this by having Darkchylde getting immediately occupied by Elijah Snow, which I completely don't buy (see below).
Furthermore, it's implausible that Zatanna could pull the mind-control attack off against Doomsday even if he inexplicably gave her the opportunity to cast her spell. She's not just forcing Brainiac out of him (which would leave a mindless Doomsday continuing to attack her), she's actually
controlling Doomsday to break off an attack with her and go chase down his own teammates and attack them instead. When has Zatanna
instantaneously flipped someones loyalty like that. All the mind altering I know of that she's done seemed to be done on already incapacitated enemies, and it seemed to be complex spells taking several minutes to perform. And Aristotle thinks Zatanna can instantly flip Doomsday into stopping his attack on her and attacking his own team, in the
fraction of a second before he pounds her to a pulp at super-speed?
Aristotle thinks Doomsday would be
easier to control because of his simple mind. But that's not true -- in the comics, he's proven extremely hard for even high-level telepaths to control,
because of his single-mindedness. Even if she's able to force Brainiac out (and the only reason I buy that is
because Doomsday is so hard to control), she's left with a mind of pure, overwhelming rage that she's not going to have an easy time affecting -- even if he wasn't simultaneously battering her with Superman-crushing attacks.
Again, even if she could magically control him, Darkchylde could break the spell, and use her teleportation to redirect even a mindless Doomsday back at Zatanna. Except Aristotle has her implausibly preoccupied with Elijah Snow (again, see below).
As for the forcefield -- Aristotle thinks that because I have Zatanna stopping Zoom with a forcefield (which I admit was probably underestimating Zoom to give Aristotle's team a decent shot), that I also have to have her stopping Doomsday with a forcefield. First of all, this makes no sense -- Doomsday with his better-than-Superman-level strength surely hits harder than Zoom. But secondly, you're saying because I under-rate
one of my own guys I'm somehow obligated to underrate them all? Since when?
And which is it, Aristotle: Do you think Zatanna could produce a Doomsday-blocking forcefield or not? If you're saying she could, I'd like to know when she ever did
anything like that in the comics. And if you admit the obvious, that she couldn't do it, then all you really are criticizing about my writeup is that I let her beat Zoom too easily. Fine, I agree, your team would be even more screwed than I portrayed. That's not really helping your case, though.
Even if Zatanna
does somehow beat Doomsday, I still think Magneto could beat her, for instance using my magnetic dust storm trick to stop her from speaking her spells.
Especially since Aristotle's all DC team has know idea how versatile and creative Magneto is in the use of his powers, so attacks like this would come as a surprise. Of course, Aristotle never gave Magneto a chance to face Zatanna, because he had Magneto losing
way too easily to Apollo (more on this in a minute).
Elijah Snow vs. Darkchylde
As I've said above, even if Doomsday didn't
already have the advantage on Zatanna, Darkchylde could easily tip things in his favor in multiple ways. But Aristotle has Elijah Snow forcing Darkchylde into a stalemate and preventing her from aiding any of her teammates. Once again, he just
assumes his character will get the drop on mine, even though there are many reasons the exact opposite should be true.
Elijah Snow moves by walking around. Darkchylde moves by teleporting. Elijah Snow (and all of Aristotle's DC/Wildstorm characters) had never even
heard of the Blue Area of the moon before the battle. Darkchylde would
literally have studied it in school. And yet somehow he gets the drop on her? It makes no sense.
Apollo vs. Magneto
Look, anyone who knows anything about Magneto doesn't need me to tell them he'd never have gone down like that. Aristotle has Apollo just flying up behind Magneto and ripping his head off. As I've said,
Magneto has shields! Shields that would be up from the start of the battle (so it doesn't matter how quickly Apollo attacks). Shields that extend all the way around him (so it doesn't matter that Apollo attacks from behind). Shields that could at least stand up to multiple blows from an uber like Thor, so a med like Apollo isn't tearing through them like tissue paper. If it takes Apollo even a
second to break through them (and it would take a lot longer than that), then that's enough time for Ambrose Chase to throw up a time-slowing field around him.
Apollo's speed wouldn't protect him. Even if he's circling around Magneto punching from all sides, Ambrose could just put up a large field around Magneto, catching both him and Apollo, and then shrink the field to just contain Apollo once he's slowed down enough to see. After that, Magneto could immediately have the Kree gun shoot him (and yes, the Kree weaponry is still there, and anyway Wieg said we could work with whatever time-period of the battlefield we wanted). The whole "moving him into position" in my writeup was just to make it a little more dramatic -- obviously he located the gun in prep-time so they could start the battle right next to it.
Anyway, even if Apollo somehow beats Magneto
and Ambrose, there's no way he's going on to beat Doomsday. Which is why once my team beats Zatanna it's all over.
As for
Batman, I've left him out of this summary because while he could pick off some of my regs (as he did in my writeup), he's not beating Doomsday either. Once I beat Aristotle's big guns, this fight is basically over.
Teamwork
Aristotle basically admits my team used better teamwork, he just thinks I shouldn't have because apparently he thinks villains are incapable of it. This despite the fact that most of my team has
been members of teams. This despite the fact that most of them have
already fought together in this competition. This despite the fact that there are
numerous villain teams in comics. Oh, and by the way, Darkchylde (as Magik) was a member of the New Mutants for several years (real time) when Magneto was the leader of the group. So she's worked with him and taken orders from him before.
Anyway, teamwork and creative strategy is supposed to be something we look for in these writeups. Saying my team used too much teamwork and strategy is a pretty weak criticism.
Let me have a closer look at the idea that villains can't function as a team. Why is this? The answer -- because they have conflicting goals. While heroes may all have the same goal -- protect the world from the bad guys -- Villains are more likely to be looking out for number one. That is, they usually do what they do for some sort of personal gain, and when they can gain by stabbing their teammates in the back, they do so.
But in this league, that's not such an issue, because all the characters really do have the same goal -- beat the opposing team. They're all stuck in a competition they can't get out of, they're all given some sort of incentive to win, and so they
all stand to gain from trying their best to win the fight. Would Ambrose Chase help Magneto kill a bunch of innocent people? Hell no. Would he help him beat a mutual enemy, someone they both stand to gain by defeating? Hell yes.
In this competition, what's more likely to break up a team is
not conflicting goals, and it's
not good vs. evil conflict, because as I said, they aren't actually
working to further good or evil, they're working to win the battle at hand. What
is more likely to break up a team is a difference in the
means they're willing to employ to accomplish these goals. In other words, they all want the same thing, but if some are willing to kill to get it and some aren't, that's going to be a problem. That's more a problem for Aristotle's team, which has the ruthless Titans of Tomorrow paired with more standard heroes. Whereas everyone on my team, including Ambrose, is willing to kill when necessary.
As for the notion that my more villainous members will brag about their past misdeeds to the point where they alienate Ambrose, don't be absurd. Magneto and Brainiac are both genius schemers, they're not stupid enough to do that. And Zoom
already sees himself as heroic in a twisted way (actually, so does Magneto), and Darkchylde isn't even particularly evil, just the demonic side of a hero. And Aristotle reveals his ignorance of Magneto by assuming Mags would tip his hand. Magneto once tricked his arch-enemies, the X-Men into thinking he'd reformed. Another time he posed as a completely different person (and a hero) for
months while in their midst.
Anyway,
even if my team displayed no teamwork, they could still win this one-on-one. I think I've made a good case above that Zoom and Doomsday could beat Flash and Zatanna, respectively, in head-to-head matches, and after that there's no stopping my team. Aristotle just underestimates all my characters. He says "Zoom always loses to Flash" because Zoom lacks combat training, even though Zoom showed he could kick Flash's ass in Blitz. He says Doomsday would be "a helpless little *****" next to a flying opponent, when Doomsday can leap
miles faster than Zatanna can dodge. Do you really think she has a Doomsday stopping attack that she could throw from
miles away? That's also ignoring that I can teleport him right next to or on top of her, and he could easily rip her apart before she could react and before he'd fall back to Earth. He also thinks Doomsday's simple mind would be more easily manipulated than Dr. Light, when in the comics he's shown far more resistance to mental tampering. As for Magneto, his forcefield is one of his strongest powers and Aristotle simply ignores it. Of course, his team would probably make the same mistake given their lack of knowledge, and they'd pay for it.
The bottom line is my team is more powerful on paper and I wrote them with better strategy too.