I completely agree 100%. People have every reason to complain and be upset at the situation here. Gamers complain about more trivial stuff but in this case, its a serious issue and shouldnt be just brushed aside and accepted. Why should Bethesda get a pass for releasing a broken game? They're a great developer, one of the best in fact, but the fact is, the PS3 release doesnt work properly and not nearly on the same level as the other platforms . Had this been some other less revered developer, people would be complaining and it would seem more acceptable, but its Bethesda, so they shall not be touched. Huh?
I was initially decided not to get into this again...but i thought that sentence deserved a response, especially since i'm the only one providing argument for 'the other side' so to speak.
First off, i'm NOT a blind, raging Bethesda fanboy( i'm more of a raging NEXUS fanboy, but that's a whole different story

) During this whole back and forth, i didn not just simply say: leave Beth alone! i personally thought i made a good enough argument..even provided technical specs on why i thought that try to fit Skyrim into PS3 hardware is like trying to fit a 400 pounds gorilla into a toolbox.
I've also thought that i've provided what i thought the reason why they decided to release the game on your fav platform anyway, despite the technical challenge.
On the other hand, the responses i get is can be summed up to : 'meh...they released a broken game...*shrugs*
So...like i said, i've never said that you can't critize Beth in this situation. What i'm saying that it takes two to Tango, and in this case, Sone PS3 design should also share the blame.
In any case, keep arguing about this is pointless at this point.
So...i'm off...playing Dawnguard!
