DeadPresident
Avenger
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2011
- Messages
- 13,952
- Reaction score
- 1,131
- Points
- 103
IMO the format of the tournament might need to be revised, it encourages cagey matches a little too much.
Iceland deserved to win. Wales deserved to win. Italy, Germany. Basically any side that actually put effort into their game rather than coasting by on draws and penalties.
This.A team that goes unbeaten to the final and wins it deserves to win
What I did like with this format is that it gave a lot of teams a chance to appear in the finals who wouldn't have otherwise and some of them were the highlight of the tournament. If they go to 32 teams we will have teams like Holland not missing out and we can avoid this 3rd place thing (only top 2 go through) to keep the groups with higher stakes. I'd prefer an even more banal qualification year if it means a better main tournament.IMO the format of the tournament might need to be revised, it encourages cagey matches a little too much.
He isn't just their best player though, he's one of the 2 best in the world. Plus he is more of a leader and has more influence than most on top of his skills. He can be an annoying and silly bastard but he's been giving everything for Portugal over his career and it's nice to see that rewarded (even if I also always find it funny when he loses). Portugal have finally shown that they aren't totally reliant on him by winning a tournament final without him against the fancied hosts.Honestly, I find it a little pathetic how shameless Portugal are about their overreliance on Ronaldo. It took them 10 minutes to take him off the pitch when he got injured. Is a Ronaldo that can barely walk still better than any of their subs? Then he basically becomes the manager during extra time, hosting team talks and barking orders. They don't even try to hide the fact that they're happy to let him carry the team on his back.
All that means are people are bitter and jealous.I think the fact that people are downplaying Portugal's win on luck, comments like "they weren't good this tournament" speaks even more to the fact that they did deserve to win it, because if they didn't deserve it, and if they weren't great, then what about all the other teams? I can't buy a team "deserving to win it" if they went out, because that means they put in a bad game that got them sent home.
What I did like with this format is that it gave a lot of teams a chance to appear in the finals who wouldn't have otherwise and some of them were the highlight of the tournament. If they go to 32 teams we will have teams like Holland not missing out and we can avoid this 3rd place thing (only top 2 go through) to keep the groups with higher stakes. I'd prefer an even more banal qualification year if it means a better main tournament.
Neutral people can have a view too. England fans have no right to be jealous of anyone competing in the final right now lol. I prefer the tournament winner to have directly taken a few bigger scalps along the way. Doesn't mean the winner didn't fully deserve to win and in a cup competition you only have to get through against whoever you get drawn against. But the victory is much more impressive that way.All that means are people are bitter and jealous.
That kind of play always has a good chance in knockout games. It's probably the best way for the non-favourite to play.Yeah that's true. I do feel like they should encourage attacking a little more, there's a bit too much turtling up. While Portugal rightly won the tournament and worked hard for it it doesn't really encourage viewership when a team can play that conservatively and win the tournament.
I wonder if making a scored draw worth 2 points would make teams go forward a bit more. Besides Leicester and Arsenal last season I feel like most teams played precisely the same style of very slow and labored football, it won't stop me from watching necessarily but it's definitely not the most enjoyable period in the last while for me.
I do agree a different qualification system would definitely liven things up a bit, though.
Who is really a neutral though? Everyone has their country, everyone is a bit bias. When it comes to Ronaldo and Portugal, it is even bigger, when you consider the Messi situation.Neutral people can have a view too. England fans have no right to be jealous of anyone competing in the final right now lol. I prefer the tournament winner to have directly taken a few bigger scalps along the way. Doesn't mean the winner didn't fully deserve to win and in a cup competition you only have to get through against whoever you get drawn against. But the victory is much more impressive that way.
That kind of play always has a good chance in knockout games. It's probably the best way for the non-favourite to play.
Are you talking about having that system in the group stage? (2 points for a score draw). To me all that is needed is the old system of top 2 only going through. The 3 points for a win already incentivises teams to go for the win as 3 draws and 3 points does not automatically get you through as top 2 in a 4 team group.
I'd welcome some more incentives for exciting football though.
A bit of bias shouldn't make much difference to someone's comments. It's the heavy and obvious bias many football fans (especially in other forums outside of here) show that seems silly. Outside of France and Portugal fans there is every possibility that another fan won't even really have a favourite between the 2 or care that much who wins, and there are others who may prefer one but are able to behave like an adult and see and comment on what is happening in front of them without changing it to help out the team they favour. And we have all seen multiple tournament winners of the past and can differentiate between which ones were more impressive than others. Of course Portugal is the most deserving of all the teams on display at this tournament just by reflection of the result and that they got there through honest means. The less positive comments on them are only relevant when comparing to other champions of the past.Who is really a neutral though? Everyone has their country, everyone is a bit bias. When it comes to Ronaldo and Portugal, it is even bigger, when you consider the Messi situation.
Neutral people can have a view too. England fans have no right to be jealous of anyone competing in the final right now lol. I prefer the tournament winner to have directly taken a few bigger scalps along the way. Doesn't mean the winner didn't fully deserve to win and in a cup competition you only have to get through against whoever you get drawn against. But the victory is much more impressive that way.
Some people ARE biased! t: And some heavily! All I initially said was that neutral people can have a view too. There are cool football fans and ******** football fans.I agree in theory but like DarthSkywalker suggested, I don't think people are completely neutral. The way certain teams play football, like some teams playing a more attacking football is gonna attract neutral viewers, and you always hear people say "now that my team is out, I'm rooting for X instead". Portugal didn't have much support going into the final because of how they played, and a lot of the so-called "neutral" fans showed clearly that they weren't neutral and that they felt the wrong team won.
Ronaldo and Fergie's embrace was very cool to see.
Same here lol.Think it's the most motivated I've ever seen him.
IMO the format of the tournament might need to be revised, it encourages cagey matches a little too much.