LOL! Folks, look at the question on that
poll:
"Who is more worthy of donning the Superman cape right now?"
The question didn't ask who looks best, who acts best, who's more recognized as, or which incarnation is better. They could have listed Danny DiVito as an option in the poll. Based on the voter's own yard stick - whatever that may be of course - the poll simply asks,
Who is more worthy?
As of right now, 61% of almost 21 THOUSAND votes registered selected Welling. Come. ON! If you haven't already done so, ask yourselves why that might be?
"He's not Superman, he's just Clark Kent. WTF?"
Okay, lets start with the obvious. EW is a magazine that's about as far from being "Superman esoteric" as Architectural digest. (Hyperbole to make a point.) Look at the people that would be voting in such a poll. For everybody that would call themselves a "Superman fan," I bet a huge percentage wouldn't know what "Crisis on Infinite Earths" was if it hit them over the head. My point? It's a general entertainment magazine and site. That means folks don't sweat the small stuff. To the GENERAL PUBLIC, Tom Welling plays Clark Kent and Clark Kent is Superman. Connect the dots in between. Some Superman "fans" may take issue with this, but Warner Bros. own sanctioned marketing never had a problem with it...
Based on data posted by the National Association of Theater Owners, the average price for a movie ticket in 2005 (full data for 2006 isn't available yet) was $6.41. If the price went up by about 25 cents (likely), then SR sold about 30M admission tickets domestically so far. Compare that to the five million or so viewers per week SV has attracted (domestically) for the last six years. I have no idea what the attrition rate is, or how much repeat business SR got during its run, but I'm quite sure SV hasn't had the SAME five million people viewing it every week since SV started.
My point? Lots and LOTS of people have at least heard of SV. Non viewers probably think, "teeny bopper Superman show," or something along those lines. Others may have seen an episode or two, and while they may not know his name, they recognize the show's star when his picture shows up in TV Guide or elsewhere. "Superman" is often written somewhere in the associated text. Many people recognize this face, and they probably think "Superman"...
So what does all that have to do with the actual poll question? Well... not much. But it might define some people's yard stick just a tad, not to mention the difference - or lack thereof - that the general public sees between two actors who are ostensibly playing the same role.
Next?
"SV fans have spammed the votes, which is why the results are skewed."
Yeah, and SV fans are the only ones who surf the Net, go to movies, and have the time to do such nonsense. C'mon peeps. The poll site lets folks vote more than once and doesn't discriminate based on choice. Like two sports teams playing against each other in the rain, both are at equal advantage/disadvantage. American Idol, anybody? Furthermore, to say that one fanship is more vocal than another kind of defeats the counter argument, no? I mean, people love good things, but things are considered good *because* they're loved. Swap the word "good" for "worthy," and we may be onto something here.
Next?
"Polls on BT's, SHH, SHP, etc., show Routh wins."
LOL! Fab. 'Cause we all know that
197 votes here,
46 votes there, and
151 votes on the Hype are representative of the general public at large. This is the same general public that voted
28 THOUSAND times at CNN (Welling 55%) and
66 THOUSAND times at MSNBC (Welling 74%). But that's okay; we'll just post links to sites most of the movie-going audience wouldn't know from a hole in the wall, or we'll hope readers will believe
412 to 316 votes on a general voting site is a landslide. Righto!
Whatever, gang. The ultimate answer to the question I suggested everybody ask themselves above may have more to do with SR than SV, but that debate has raged on for months, and I have no interest in dredging it up again. We've kind of beat that sucker into the ground anyway.
Anyhoo... the fact that some geeks see Welling as a lame version of Clark Kent on a dumb TV show, and Routh as the perfect Superman/Clark Kent in feature films today, doesn't change the fact that the
general public *apparently* sees a more worthy actor than what the geeks think, and the fact that that actor hasn't even worn the costume yet speaks volumes.
<- Considers herself a "geek," but not a stereotypical one.
BTW, hi Kane. Back so soon?