Face or Body?

Face or Body

  • Face

  • Body


Results are only viewable after voting.
Face, definitely, I mean, if they have a bad body, it's not like that's something going to the gym won't fix. Also if I feel disgusted by kissing someone's face...that's...not good.
 
Eyes...gotta include eyes Erz...
She only needs 2 of them. I've had essentially every eye color. It doesn't really matter for me and eyes don't really rhyme with lips, ****, and hips. :o
 
But the question you got ask yourself is...would you count eyes if she didn't have any? :o
 
She only needs 2 of them. I've had essentially every eye color. It doesn't really matter for me and eyes don't really rhyme with lips, ****, and hips. :o

true..but you gotta admit eyes play a big part, especially when she looks up at you while sucking on a...um...lollypop...
 
true..but you gotta admit eyes play a big part, especially when she looks up at you while sucking on a...um...lollypop...
There needs to be tears in them or it doesn't work. :csad:
 
gs1.jpg

fluvia3.jpg

maddy.jpg

246998839_6399ec3ad5_o.jpg

plus_model.jpg

CherylE_1.jpg
 
If we're talking about someone I want to be with, then face, easily.
But if its just a friends with benefits package, then body easily.

I voted face since a relationship is more important than a one nighter.
 
I think some people tend to grow on you after a while, looks or not. There was one girl I went to school with at Purdue...not exactly a hot face, decent body. I would just see her in class, be like, "what's up" go on my way. But over time her personality started coming out, and she was somewhat on the sarcastic side, pretty outgoing, etc. And slowly you start to get interested, even if she isn't that hot.
 
Prioirities

1. not fat
2. boobs
3. butts
4. legs
5. hands
6. arms
7. stomach
8. back
9. face
10. feet
 
ideally, i'd say both, but, for the sake of the thread, i'll say face.

i mean, she doesn't have to have the face and body of a goddess, but she can't really have a "banging" body, with one eye missing, or a perfect face, but her body eggplant's out into a shaved baby gorilla form.

you've got to have a nice balance, if you can't have both, but ultimately, a face is more important, because that's what you should (or, ought to) be looking at most of the time.
 
face, because its up to the person to watch there weight/shape. your right, anyone can have a good body if you really work at it.
 
No, no, no, no, no and no.

So the body means more than the face. Unless you mean skinny equates to ugly, because there are more skinny girls with attractive faces than vice versa.
 
So the body means more than the face. Unless you mean skinny equates to ugly, because there are more skinny girls with attractive faces than vice versa.

I have to have both to be happy.
 

Umm...Both??

I'd say face ranks higher...but if she foo-pah is just in-ignorably massive then even if she looked like Elisha Cuthbert in the face, I couldn't do it. :(

Trust me, if it weren't for the sake of this thread, there would be a "both" option. :rolleyes:

I didn't want to choose, either. :csad:

Define a hot body though. There are chubby chicks with attractive faces. And some dudes wouldn't take that at all. If she has a nice face, chances are her body doesn't suck.

I think Warhammer agreed with my technical stats of like a size 14-16 girl.

I'm still wondering how you can have a nice face but a horrible body. You mean too skinny, too fat, what?

Alright, I'll change my first post, to try and elaborate more on what you mean, terry. Erz, I guess what we thought the meaning would be won't cut it.

Terry, be sure to read the first post again, to see what I mean.

Face, definitely, I mean, if they have a bad body, it's not like that's something going to the gym won't fix. Also if I feel disgusted by kissing someone's face...that's...not good.

Agreed.
A body can be changed, but a beautiful face can't (if you take $ and surgery out of the equation).
 
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"