Fallout 4

Status
Not open for further replies.
1XkLumal.jpg



Accurate AF.
 
Go kill the guy who shot you in the head doesn't scream greatness, and that's what those games are needing story - wise, with a good plot and solid characters to interact with, not only one. That's it.
Thats the set up, but that's not the ENTIRE story, its actually a minor detail. Did you even make it to Freeside?
 
Thats the set up, but that's not the ENTIRE story, its actually a minor detail. Did you even make it to Freeside?

The last time I played the Fallout games it was four years ago, so my memory is failing me, but I did finished all of them.

Like, the thing I remember most from FL3, besides the vault, it's the last part and what happens with daddy in where you are at the end.

Sorry, tryin' to avoid spoilers.
 
Last edited:
Can't say I'm excited. I expected darker tone and better visuals. But we barely saw anything, so I'll wait for E3. They will probably show some gameplay.

Made me appreciate Witcher 3 and Arkham Knight visuals a lot more.
 
The last time I played the Fallout games it was four years ago, so my memory is failing me, but I did finished all of them.

Like, the the thing I remember most from FL3, besides the vault, it's the last part and what happens with daddy in where you are at the end.

Sorry, tryin' to avoid spoilers.

You should really give NV another go around and play the DLC. The "find the guy who shot you" part of the game can be completed within the first 2-3 hours
 
Last edited:
Well if there had to be a game to make me go out and buy a PS4, its this. Been waiting so damn long for this game to come out. :hyper:
 
I usually book it north to Vegas as soon as I wake up running like the dickens to get away from everything trying to murder me until I hit the Vegas wall. ****ing Cazadors.
 
Can't say I'm excited. I expected darker tone and better visuals. But we barely saw anything, so I'll wait for E3. They will probably show some gameplay.

Made me appreciate Witcher 3 and Arkham Knight visuals a lot more.

I expected better visuals myself, but the darker tone, I don't understand why you expect a darker tone given this franchises history.
 
I think it will be 2015. We've known they have been working on it for a long time, but I just think wanted to wait near the end to start marketing it.

I'll wait for a collectors edition.
 
Look at the still pictures.. The environments are amazing looking.
 
Better than the dog**** we got in F03, at least it NV was narratively consistent with the original games.


Of all the tastes you got available to you now...you have to choose the bitter one:whatever:

Being consistent with the older games doesn't necessarily means that the game is automatically better.


While i do love FO:NV , and it does have better writing in parts, the game was boring compared to FO3 due to it's setting, lack of enemies and it's pretty linear.

But back to FO4

One million views on TY...half of those was mine:yay:
 
Of all the tastes you got available to you now...you have to choose the bitter one:whatever:

Being consistent with the older games doesn't necessarily means that the game is automatically better.


While i do love FO:NV , and it does have better writing in parts, the game was boring compared to FO3 due to it's setting, lack of enemies and it's pretty linear.

But back to FO4

One million views on TY...half of those was mine:yay:

The exploration in NV is linear, but the narrative is not. The Narrative (main quest) in Fo3 is painfully linear, it does not branch at ALL, you can sequence break certain parts, but its still a straight line, the side quests in FO3 have no real baring and there is so many wasted locations where there is nothing to actually do especially in the DLCs.
 
So, to give even more credence to the 2015 release, apparently Domino's UK twitter tweeted something about an upcoming promotion they will be running for Fallout 4. The tweet seems to have been deleted, but yeah, if they're already on the verge of running promotions, it's 2015.
 
If you have 30 seconds, give 1(888)-4-vault-tec a call. It's awesome.
 
So, to give even more credence to the 2015 release, apparently Domino's UK twitter tweeted something about an upcoming promotion they will be running for Fallout 4. The tweet seems to have been deleted, but yeah, if they're already on the verge of running promotions, it's 2015.

They've probably been working on gnus since Skyrim finished up. Maybe before.
 
I was planning on playing Fallout 3 this Winter, so I kinda hope F4 isn't coming out this Fall.
 
Well you exist alone there RAAM. :p
 
I was planning on playing Fallout 3 this Winter, so I kinda hope F4 isn't coming out this Fall.

If it comes out this Fall, you can still play Fallout 3 but by the time you are done, F4 will be cheaper. Look at it that way
 
The exploration in NV is linear, but the narrative is not. The Narrative (main quest) in Fo3 is painfully linear, it does not branch at ALL, you can sequence break certain parts, but its still a straight line, the side quests in FO3 have no real baring and there is so many wasted locations where there is nothing to actually do especially in the DLCs.

Define'Wasted locations'

Just because locations wasn't tied to any of the storyline doesn't mean that it's 'wasted'. It encourage you to go out there and explore instead of being herded to locations like in NV.

There are enourmous details put into each locations in FO3 , that tells it's own story.That is if you paid any attentions to the little details like the skeletons in that school, the Mc Clelan townhome and dozens and dozen other locations like that. Those are not 'wasted locations'....even if they are not locations included in the storyline.

And they do have a purpose in the overall game.It adds to the athmosphere. it rewarded you for exploring. There is nothing like this in NV.

This is something i hope they continue in FO4

exploring just because you want to...not because you're just grinding quests
 
Define'Wasted locations'

Just because locations wasn't tied to any of the storyline doesn't mean that it's 'wasted'. It encourage you to go out there and explore instead of being herded to locations like in NV.

There are enourmous details put into each locations in FO3 , that tells it's own story.That is if you paid any attentions to the little details like the skeletons in that school, the Mc Clelan townhome and dozens and dozen other locations like that. Those are not 'wasted locations'....even if they are not locations included in the storyline.

And they do have a purpose in the overall game.It adds to the athmosphere. it rewarded you for exploring. There is nothing like this in NV.

This is something i hope they continue in FO4

exploring just because you want to...not because you're just grinding quests

But with a good portion of these locations there is no actual gameplay payoff, you're rewarded with some caps and maybe some ammo. Old Olney and The Dunwich Building pre DLC come to mind, the other vaults etc. I get what your saying about atmosphere, but if I explore an area, and all I get out of it are some shotgun shells and maybe some magazines, it kinda pisses me off.
 
I liked both FO3 and NV.. A lot.. And for different reasons.

Maybe I'm different, lol.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"