Fixing Punisher:War Zone

Bubonic

Superhero
Joined
Feb 17, 2007
Messages
5,047
Reaction score
0
Points
31
I've seen people who love this film challenging the nay-sayers by asking how they'd of done it, what they'd change.

I think if they'd stuck with how Ennis set up the Punisher origin, we'd have our "Dark Knight".

The movie would end up being mostly origin, but wow, if the material was followed with respect... It wouldn't matter... Tyger's story cutting into Born, and then finishing off with In The Beginning?

You'd have a masterpiece if they acting and directing were top notch.
And not just an insanely fun, over the top "b" movie.

So what would you have tweaked, omitted, added?
 
honestly, the only thing i'd change is to tweak the skull a bit and maybe make the flick a few minutes longer
 
The movie would end up being mostly origin, but wow, if the material was followed with respect... It wouldn't matter... Tyger's story cutting into Born, and then finishing off with In The Beginning?

You'd have a masterpiece if they acting and directing were top notch.
And not just an insanely fun, over the top "b" movie.

As much as I would love to see that movie, I knew it wasn't going to happen this time around. The budget was obviously going to be nowhere big enough to do such a story.. I mean they even cut the military stuff out of Hensleigh's script. I knew this movie wasn't going to go in a Batman Begins direction long before they even started shooting. But even still, I didn't doubt the quality.

I was satisfied with the film because they were more loyal to the character than anyone else ever was, they made it extremely action packed and I'm a big fan of gore, and the movie didn't take itself too serious which for me helped made it less cheesy, knowing that the actors were just out to have a fun time with these characters.

I would love to see a serious Punisher film but its not very likely now. 15-20 years? Lets at least hope for that.
 
I've seen people who love this film challenging the nay-sayers by asking how they'd of done it, what they'd change.

I think if they'd stuck with how Ennis set up the Punisher origin, we'd have our "Dark Knight".

The movie would end up being mostly origin, but wow, if the material was followed with respect... It wouldn't matter... Tyger's story cutting into Born, and then finishing off with In The Beginning?

You'd have a masterpiece if they acting and directing were top notch.
And not just an insanely fun, over the top "b" movie.

So what would you have tweaked, omitted, added?


It would be a direct translation from every Max comic starting from "In the beginning" the reason why it #$%^ing tanked was because every Hollywood bozo who gets a hold of the Punisher material feels they have to make up their own freakin story! Also, it would be told seriously, with a "NARRATIVE!!!" 04 was almost on the money when they included the narrative, but every Punisher comic always began with "Punisher War Journal#" If some director included it in the next incarnation I'd have a geekgasm. I say if you want something done right do it yourself.
 
I don't think that "In the Beginning" would translate perfectly to film. Not enough really happens, and that part of the movie would probably last all of 20 minutes. Furthermore, there'd be a huge time skip. You'd go from him being a kid, to a young adult in Vietnam, to him 55 years old as Punisher.

An Ennis adaptation wouldn't matter if the director wasn't going to take it seriously. Look at Barracuda. Did Ennis take THAT seriously? Not really. I'm sure Lexi Alexander could have camped up "The Slavers" if she tried.

As for fixing P:WZ, I would have had someone better rewrite/tweak the script, recast the majority of the lower-tier actors, and balance the action better with story. Maybe there's a different cut out there that can save the film the way that DD's DC did, but I doubt it, there's a LOT that needs to be changed to fix Warzone.

Oh, and
don't kill off Micro!
 
I've seen people who love this film challenging the nay-sayers by asking how they'd of done it, what they'd change.

I think if they'd stuck with how Ennis set up the Punisher origin, we'd have our "Dark Knight".

The movie would end up being mostly origin, but wow, if the material was followed with respect... It wouldn't matter... Tyger's story cutting into Born, and then finishing off with In The Beginning?

You'd have a masterpiece if they acting and directing were top notch.
And not just an insanely fun, over the top "b" movie.

So what would you have tweaked, omitted, added?

I could care less about the naysayers (hardcorefans), most of them had been that way since the start - The only thing I would do is make a sequel, I thought Lexi did an amazing job and this movie will pick up steam. Most average movie goers did not realize this was a revamp, they thought it was a sequel with Jane replaced therefore it was hexed upon release. It was never clear to the average joe that it was a revamp and the average movie goer is not going to research to find that out. I even heard on a radio staion a day before release that it was a sequel starring Jane. This movie has more positive critic and fan review then 2004 Jane punisher. It will pick up....Unless people go see bolt over and over. I just think it was confusion for the average movie goer, but word will get out there.
 
Last edited:
I've seen people who love this film challenging the nay-sayers by asking how they'd of done it, what they'd change.

I think if they'd stuck with how Ennis set up the Punisher origin, we'd have our "Dark Knight".

The movie would end up being mostly origin, but wow, if the material was followed with respect... It wouldn't matter... Tyger's story cutting into Born, and then finishing off with In The Beginning?

You'd have a masterpiece if they acting and directing were top notch.
And not just an insanely fun, over the top "b" movie.

So what would you have tweaked, omitted, added?
AMEN!!!Couldn't have said it better myself! What Garth Ennis wrote was epic. Everything is right there in the MAX series in front of them to translate into a true Punisher movie! and I disagree with it being a fun movie but that's my opinion. I'm sure Ennis is disgusted with what they did to his baby. Lexi & company made a comedy.
 
Adaptation of The Slavers

in the years he's been slaughtering criminals, Frank Castle has become a myth where noone really knows what created the monster that is The Punisher.

When a Russian mobster is released from prison, he soon discovers that Castle has been looking for him, in his attempts to get himself out of trouble, he runs to the highest placed man he knows in his syndicate.

Turned away, both himself and his cronies are summarily slaughtered by The Punisher for their crimes, but not before Castle notices that he has contacts higher on the criminal foodchain. While investigating these shadowy slavs, he discovers a trade in young girls for sex slaves.

Taking the lone survivor of a brutal cull to hide the evidence, Castle heads to Mexico where the slavers have set up shop, where he is asked questions about what his revenge has brought him when, for every monster he slays, a new one arises.

Of course, the answer is that even if it is futile, the guilty still need the punishment that civilisation cannot give them. The guilty need to be punished, the innocent need to be saved, and brutal men need to be shown what it truly is to feel helpless.

---------------------------

I'm not saying that's perfect, but it solves a lot of problems.

1) by only having a limited time in a city, you don't spend a fortune filming in NYC.
2) the Mexico setting is a different world, but one just as threatening as any city
3) the origin is something that is suggested at, ala The Usual Suspects, and Castle can reveal it to the girl he's saved in answer to why he's killing these men
4) it also gives you at least two or three big setpieces that are driven by the story
5) plenty of opportunity to build both Castle's character, the girl's character and the villains' characters - and plenty of opportunity for decent drama:

- ever growing paranoia amongst the criminals
- someone who's shut himself off from emotion being forced to face up to the acts of those he's killing
- a commentary of the invisibility of the victims of crime
- a modern Western type vibe, with Castle going to make something right
- the revalation of the true death of Castle, as a coping mechanism for the brutality of the world.
 
As much as I would love to see that movie, I knew it wasn't going to happen this time around. The budget was obviously going to be nowhere big enough to do such a story.. I mean they even cut the military stuff out of Hensleigh's script. I knew this movie wasn't going to go in a Batman Begins direction long before they even started shooting. But even still, I didn't doubt the quality.

It was no secret that this was never set out to be some deep, reflective movie. But from early interviews it seemed like it was going to be taken somewhat seriously. Maybe I got the wrong impression when Stevenson went on about how they weren't going to glorify the lifestyle. I thought it would go beyond killing the fed, because the rest of it seemed fun as hell!

I was satisfied with the film because they were more loyal to the character than anyone else ever was, they made it extremely action packed and I'm a big fan of gore, and the movie didn't take itself too serious which for me helped made it less cheesy, knowing that the actors were just out to have a fun time with these characters.

Definitely felt more like Castle then any try before hand, I'd of thought he would of been devoid of visible emotion after his families shooting, just slowing down when he ****ed up.

I would love to see a serious Punisher film but its not very likely now. 15-20 years? Lets at least hope for that.

If that's the case, I'm glad I am in my 20's still... But as some have mentioned, maybe HBO or something like that would be the way to go. I just wonder if they could afford the gore budget, and maybe do a show of him in Vietnam.

It would be a direct translation from every Max comic starting from "In the beginning" the reason why it #$%^ing tanked was because every Hollywood bozo who gets a hold of the Punisher material feels they have to make up their own freakin story! Also, it would be told seriously, with a "NARRATIVE!!!" 04 was almost on the money when they included the narrative, but every Punisher comic always began with "Punisher War Journal#" If some director included it in the next incarnation I'd have a geekgasm. I say if you want something done right do it yourself.

I love the narrative, for the Punisher it really is one of the few ways you'll be able to let the audience peer in to his rationale. He isn't much for monologuing.

I don't think that "In the Beginning" would translate perfectly to film. Not enough really happens, and that part of the movie would probably last all of 20 minutes. Furthermore, there'd be a huge time skip. You'd go from him being a kid, to a young adult in Vietnam, to him 55 years old as Punisher.

Maybe I am chewing off more then I can swallow with my dream movie, but I figure it could be a sort of three act movie... I just don't know how long one-shots like Tyger and Born would take up on the screen... They probably could each be made into a respective movie for all I know.

But I'm pretty sure there have been movies that spent a large chunk of the story in childhood, then switched to adulthood... I mean, look at Forrest Gump or It.

The way I'd handle Tyger would be by making the audience see from little Frank Castles perspective, instead of focusing on the kids reactions(this would be to avoid poor delivery from a kid actor).

Then you could have half an hour or so of him in Vietnam, him not putting up with some of the **** that went down there, and that final panel where he is ankle deep in bodies and has basically cracked... Then you could end the movie with an adaptation of In The Beginning to show the audience where he is now, establish that the Punisher character has come alive... And the movie would have been brutal and interesting the whole way through, which makes me think the audience wouldn't be disappointed like in 2004.

An Ennis adaptation wouldn't matter if the director wasn't going to take it seriously. Look at Barracuda. Did Ennis take THAT seriously? Not really. I'm sure Lexi Alexander could have camped up "The Slavers" if she tried.

I guess that is another point. If this creative team can't handle something like this, can't make Barracuda like making him seem like a parody of a parody of a parody... Then maybe someone with more experience, and the guts to try to make something good, not just some defeatist who makes it a joke because they can't figure how to do it any other way.

As for fixing P:WZ, I would have had someone better rewrite/tweak the script, recast the majority of the lower-tier actors, and balance the action better with story. Maybe there's a different cut out there that can save the film the way that DD's DC did, but I doubt it, there's a LOT that needs to be changed to fix Warzone.

Oh, and
don't kill off Micro!

I think the different cut will have more of Frank and the feds family, which wasn't playing out all that well within the context of the hilarity of the rest of the film anyways.

AMEN!!!Couldn't have said it better myself! What Garth Ennis wrote was epic. Everything is right there in the MAX series in front of them to translate into a true Punisher movie! and I disagree with it being a fun movie but that's my opinion. I'm sure Ennis is disgusted with what they did to his baby. Lexi & company made a comedy.

Exactly, I'm sure some minor adjustments might have to be made to the material, that's inevitable really... But not going 180 on the source material like they did with the movie.

I think it was The Guard who asked me what was so much better about Pittsy and Ink in the comics, which makes me wonder if he even read them.

They weren't cookie cutter canon fodder. They came off as menacing. Legitimate threats. Pittsy was some sort of surreal hothead that made certain Joe Pesci characters look like Dr. Phil and could have been played by someone like Mickey Rourke, and Ink was this "quirky", quiet weirdo who was basically had an unassuming demeanor, looking more like Steve Buscemi then some model kid.
 
Well not anything major but id still like to see what scenes lexi alexander had in mind or what got cut.


But mainly id change Looney Bin Jims style of fighting at the end have him cheap shotting the punisher while he was making his way through the hotel till they finally fight. He shouldnt be a kung fu master but just a crazy bastard who swings an axe or something and lunges at frank while trying to tear his face off.
 
Honestly? I wouldn't really change that much, because this is the Punisher I grew up reading. People don't seem willing to admit that Frank Castle was around long before 2003.

This is not to say I couldn't enjoy a serious-minded Punisher film, just that I have zero problem with one that is over-the-top. If given the choice between trying to turn the character into The Dark Knight or having him literally punch a guy's face in...:unishr:
 
What I would have done differently:

Maginty and his Parkour nonsense add absolutely nothing to film so he would have been written out, The mirror breaking scene with Jigsaw and LBJ would have been cut, The infamous LBJ " Yummy yummy..." line would have been cut, Angela's last line "my husband said you were one of the good guys" CUT and I would have ended the film with just Frank returning to his lair and spared the audience the Soap mugging. I wouldn't have killed Micro and I would have handled Loony Bin Jim quite differently, in film he's supposed to be psychotic, but the actor chose to keep him in tone with Jigsaw so he camped him up so in the end he comes off like an exploited mentally ******ed person. I would have kept the character silent and/or serious in the same vain as Kevin from Sin City to balance out the tone of the film.

Id like to see a direct adaptation of the source material next time, an adaptaion of Slavers would defiantly be a step in the right direction.
 
I know this kinda changes the subject but,does anyone think that Ving Rhames would work as Shotgun?:huh:
 
If they cut the ******** and change the ending , there's a 90 minute cut of this film that could save this movie.
 
I know this kinda changes the subject but,does anyone think that Ving Rhames would work as Shotgun?:huh:

any buff black actor can be typecast to play Shotgun. He's just an unoriginal attempt from Marvel to be "black friendly."

Ever since they cut Bishop's hair I always beleived the opposite to be true. :whatever:
 
Shotgun sucks anyway. Punisher doesn't need another stupid sidekick.
 
Or any more "stereotypes". Punisher fans hate those. :)
 
What I would have done differently:

Maginty and his Parkour nonsense add absolutely nothing to film so he would have been written out, The mirror breaking scene with Jigsaw and LBJ would have been cut, The infamous LBJ " Yummy yummy..." line would have been cut, Angela's last line "my husband said you were one of the good guys" CUT and I would have ended the film with just Frank returning to his lair and spared the audience the Soap mugging. I wouldn't have killed Micro and I would have handled Loony Bin Jim quite differently, in film he's supposed to be psychotic, but the actor chose to keep him in tone with Jigsaw so he camped him up so in the end he comes off like an exploited mentally ******ed person. I would have kept the character silent and/or serious in the same vain as Kevin from Sin City to balance out the tone of the film.

I had a bunch of issues with the film, but if what you mentioned would have been edited out/ reshot it definitely would not have made it be as embarrassing to watch.
 
I had friends I grew up with in south NY that hated this film just for the butchered dialect.


Yeah i'm from Brooklyn NY and that was the one thing I hated about the movie was the bad NY accents and the fake wannabe gangster talk. It was almost as bad as Geena Davis Brooklyn accent in Angie. Other then that I enjoyed the movie a lot. Ray was the Perfect Punisher. It finally felt like I was watching the Punisher on screen. Plus the action scenes with the shooting and fighting were done very good. One small thing I liked in the movie is when Frank scopes out the Bradstreet hotel prepping himself before he goes in good stuff.
 
It definitely had Ray as some of the best parts in War Zone, but the lame laughably stereotypical Comic Book Villains killed alot of "Cult" re-watching viewing this flick potentially had. This was Escape from L.A. bad.
 
It definitely had Ray as some of the best parts in War Zone, but the lame laughably stereotypical Comic Book Villains killed alot of "Cult" re-watching viewing this flick potentially had. This was Escape from L.A. bad.


You need to realize that your opinion isn't a fact. It's an opinion, and others are allowed to have different opinions than yours.
 
I don't think it's on that level of a bad movie. To me it was one of the better action movies to come out in years.
 
You need to realize that your opinion isn't a fact. It's an opinion, and others are allowed to have different opinions than yours.

I think that's what he was doing......stating his opinion. Anytime someone posts something it's only their opinion. If you enjoyed the film, I am happy for you. But to some of us it was a laughable attempt at filmaking.






IMO
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
201,146
Messages
21,906,840
Members
45,703
Latest member
Weird
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"