Spider-Vader
Mercin' & Workin'
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2007
- Messages
- 12,396
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 58
Eh, that looks dumb. I want something sinister looking.
Punisher maybe because it's realistic like TDK but way too violent
and probably wouldn't have a good story like TDK.
Watched The Dark Knight and it's nothing but spectacular. I will not put spoiler in here but let just say it's more of a thriller-drama than a superhero exposition where the hero flies or shoots laser from his palm. So who are among the numerous Marvel franchises will have films more similar to TDK than your average superhero movie?
The candidates most probably are:
1. Captain America
2. Daredevil
3. The Punisher
4. Moon Knight
5. Black Panther
and many more. But what do you think will be the best one?
To match TDK it's not about matching it's edginess, darkness, and "realism", it's about skilled filmmaking, with a conflict that means something, a standout performance, and a story that resonates with viewers. Star Wars and 2001: A Space Odyssey are both science fiction classics, but they're true to themselves and not at all alike. Hiring good filmmakers and letting them go for broke is a better idea than trying to imitate TDK's sensibilities.
A Spider-Man film that successfully brings to life the drama and character beats of "The Master Planner Saga" could be every bit the transcendant film that TDK is.
Capt. America should never be as dark as Batman. But these days it's harder to sell the flag without appearing too nationalistic.
I like the director's cut of Daredevil. The dynamics of the blue-collar environment reaches me better than a mish-mashed Gotham City. Bringing up religious icons don't bother me as long as it's not too preachy. If they should ever resume the franchise, they need a compelling angle on how people are still victims of urban crime.
Punisher should always be the extreme answer to crimefighting. Grim and unapologetic. But I hope the gore in this upcoming film isn't too silly. That red-band trailer was a splatter fest.
Moon Knight. Hmmm. Too redundant. It's too early for him
Black Panther. No way. He's a king, a genius, and a warrior from the most advanced nation in the world. Everything Batman has, King T'Challa has more of and people can't understand that.
It's bad enough Danny Glover can't sell his movie concept on the Haitian Revolution.
But people will have a harder time accepting this great hero unless some white guy or girl is standing by him.
It would be like when Raymond Burr had to be cut into Godzilla to sell it to the West. Ironically, if Blade wasn't made, the superhero franchise wouldn't have gotten revived.
Cap can be dark and be great. Read Brubaker's run. He isn't as dark as batman, of course but he does need some darkness. Especially if they want it to be realistic.
Why is MK redundant?
Batman isn't a king.
They use the political angle like what Priest used in the comics which go into areas Batman doesn't. He has a lot of differences they could explore.
No-one will think he's Batman then.
That sounds like an interesting movie.
Everett K. Ross. They could use T'Challa's white college girlfriend too.
It's not getting a film any time soon.
It's not the same type of darkness. And he's not as lonely as Batman.
We've got enough non-powered superheroes with gadgets. The more variety the better.
But will those issues really catch the interest of the general audience?
But no big studio wants to fund it and they want a white hero. Danny Glover got most of his funding from Pres. Hugo Chavez!
I don't care for Ross and I don't care for any college girlfriend.
And we know why.
Darkness doesn't always equal lonely.
Cap's fought Nazis in world war 2. That's heavy ****. It can get even more freaky with the Red Skull running around.
He needs to deal with corrupt governments and changing political atmospheres in different eras. The material writes itself.
Thats only surface detail. All heroes are unique if you look hard enough.
MK is a cold blooded merc turned vigilante who may or may not be the resurrected/avatar of Konshu. That's a great hook in itself. They could do loads of material just examining that.
He's also a super-hero with MPD. The public has never seen that on film before.
If they can execute it and market it well it should.
It would make it much more unique as a super-hero film.
Batman deals with drama while BP deals with politics.
He should find out how Don Cheatal got Hotel Rwanda movie made and copy it.
Why not? They reach the requirements to get the white audience more interested in BP.
Why?
But it's still not the same darkness as Batman. The enemies aren't psychotics, they're threats to liberty, equality, and human rights.
And Cap is the open symbol who can directly lead the people.
Unfortunately, after TDK's big success, it's either perceived as a rip-off, or somebody come up with a spoof.
Buffy can compete with Blade because the approach is completely different.
Oh I think Batman is borderline crazy enough.
The studios will have to be very careful on how they market it. It's one thing where Hollywood argues against the follies of the West. Post 9-11 America has got brought lots of material to make it examine itself.
It's another thing to have a fictional country do that, and be more advanced than they are.
I'm not sure exactly what you mean by this. Could you explain it clearer, please?I thought "Lumumba" was great, but it's a tragedy. Wakanda is anything but.
It's not the same thing. This is the Haitian Revolution. It's not about blacks killing each other and the West does nothing.
We should be past that already. Hong Kong action films sold without any white character to back up the hero. But if Danny Glover can't sell his film because there's no white hero, how can we get a African superhero without a white guy to back him up?
Black Panther has a kingdom to support him.That's not a comedy act like in "Coming to America", that's power!
Hiruu:
I think this serves as a strong basis for Black Panther origin story timeline:
- The whole birth thing, and maybe a tragic event or 2
- T'Challa goes to the west to school, and meets up with some future contacts in Marvel universe
- He returns home and White Wolf is plotting with M'Baku to kill the soon to-be king Klaw is their agent. Father was murdered by Klaw, and White Wolf and MBaku will use him to finish off TChalla to assume power in Wakanda.
-TChalla becomes Black Panther, and his father is avenged, Klaw is defeated, the plan fails, but MBaku BECOMES Man-Ape and White Wolf escapes as well to become the mercenary for the follow-on movies if this one succeeds.
You don't think Modok, A.I.M, Hydra, Baron Zemo, Red Skull, Arnim Zola, Baron Strucker, Hate Monger, Crossbones and the numerous other freaks Cap fights are psychos?
Cap's got a twisted rogues gallery.
Yes indeed. With Captain America people should feel more optimistic, because he strives for ideals we can all aspire to in the open with courage and hope. He doesn't settle for compromise just to promote his beliefs.That should make it easier to do complex stuff with.
That happens to every film. Marvel shouldn't worry about it.
They don't need to focus the attention on America totally for it to work, either. There are numerous factions within Wakanda who could be the big bads in the first movie.
Klaw doesn't need to be tied to any specific government to work. He'd be fine being hired by corporations like Roxxon who answer to no country or hired by said big bad.
If its fictional what's the big deal?
I'm not sure exactly what you mean by this. Could you explain it clearer, please?
Neither Ross or T'Challa's white girlfriend diminish BP in any way. Ross was a comic relief in the comics but they could easily make him more serious. Have him in a similar role like John Myers from Hellboy.
Yes, but those guys symbolize threats to the modern West. Batman's villains are really urban horrors. They're mostly psychos who have been ruined in modern, urban society. Even Catwoman fits the profile. She was an abused woman who rebels against society.
Cap's foes operate on a wider scale. Ra's Al Ghul doesn't compare to HYDRA. The world knows they exist but they still can recruit followers. Why? Because there are people, like Crossbones, who think democracy doesn't work and people should not be equal to each other. It's got nothing to do with madness, it's human hatred.
Yes indeed. With Captain America people should feel more optimistic, because he strives for ideals we can all aspire to in the open with courage and hope. He doesn't settle for compromise just to promote his beliefs.
Marvel shouldn't worry at all. They're getting their products on film. Das Weiner Bros. have chosen more Vertigo titles than superhero titles. Now they're releasing Watchmen? That's the 'be all and end all' of modern superheroes!
It shouldn't be a big deal. But this project has been in the works for years now. As we get more mainstream heroes back in the screen, the audience could forget that other heroes can be great to watch.
"Lumumba" is a tragic story. It's partly an indictment against western colonialism.
But Wakanda is a nation that has never been conquered and it's super advanced.
They are not victims, they're a shining example of what the world can achieve without Western interference.
I don't think Black Panther needs somebody like that.
He's got those fine bodyguards whom I can watch all day.
It goes beyond human hatred. None of Caps enemies would pass a psyche test. They're very crazy people.