[A]
Avenger
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2008
- Messages
- 18,500
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
This is art, man.
This is art, man.
블라스;16098685 said:I can understand selling ass or **** for a sex comedy, but for a horror movie?
**** this crap.
..and less high-profile ****tiness*She's hot in that Megan Fox kinda way, except not so much teeth and nails.
Tattoos are hot.and unlike Megan Fox, she hasnt made some horrificly bad tattoo choices.
My God, I hope your kidding.
Question. Have you ever seen a horror movie?
Or posters of sci-f or Horror from the 50's with a large breasted woman being carried away by the monster? It's always marketed the promice of T & A in horror movies. And this flick is PG-13.
블라스;16253446 said:Yeah, I have see what I consider real horror movies, like The Shining, JC's The Thing, 28 days later..., The Mist, etc, and none of them needed that type of promotion/scenes.
I do get what you're saying, and I certainly didn't mean to offend anyone, but come on, you can see what I'm saying too, can't you?
I like T&A as much as the next guy, it's just that I can't take a "horror" movie seriously if that's the main appeal. Just a personal thing.
Edit: Ditto on the "Get Carter" avvy comment![]()
Tattoos are hot.![]()
We were talking about Megan Fox. She really doesn't have THAT many.Not when they're on every inch of your body. That's disgusting.