elsewhere
The Dark Knight
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2009
- Messages
- 2,091
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
AHEM. I believe you said this to Craig not too long ago.
And? You gonna try and get me banned?

AHEM. I believe you said this to Craig not too long ago.

And? You gonna try and get me banned?![]()

Ah. Clarity always helps.I meant Raimi and his trilogy, let's keep him [Raimi] out of this.

Nah, I'm just pointing out that you have a history of bias and like to make vacuous comments that seem to suggest that you think your opinion is fact. It isn't. Hilarious, I know.![]()
![]()
![]()
Sure. Mhm. Whatever.
I'm not going to get into with you.
Carry on.

I meant Raimi and his trilogy, let's keep him [Raimi] out of this.
My bad.

I hope you're joking around.Why not high 80s? Why not high 90s?!
I hope you're joking around.
Yes, of course I'm joking.Who cares about top critics? It's nonsensical to look at a smaller sample of reviews for comparison. Look at the general percentage. It's much higher than TASM.
User rating is even more unreliable. People are idiots. They tend to go back and rate things lower (SM1 has a 65%? Really?If it's a numbers game then the RT user rating should get the highest acknowledgement.
But if you use that rating ASM will most likely get a better start than the Raimi movies (SM1).
) just because of SM3. I already said to look at the general percentage that they give you, which is currently at a 78%. Just because you want the film to be better received than Raimi's doesn't mean it will be, and it simply isn't at that level of positive reception, no matter how many reviews/percentages you choose to ignore. Could you enjoy it more? Sure. Best not to base your opinion off of RT.Depends how much stock you put into the mass audience.
I'm not going to base my opinion on RT. But how these movies are viewed by the critics and public has a measurable effect on the future of Spider-man movies and comic book movies in general.User rating is even more unreliable. People are idiots. They tend to go back and rate things lower (SM1 has a 65%? Really?) just because of SM3. I already said to look at the general percentage that they give you, which is currently at a 78%. Just because you want the film to be better received than Raimi's doesn't mean it will be, and it simply isn't at that level of positive reception, no matter how many reviews/percentages you choose to ignore. Could you enjoy it more? Sure. Best not to base your opinion off of RT.
Well, I put none.
Once again, top critics are a smaller sample and therefore it's inaccurate to say that based off of them, this film is being received better than either SM1 or SM2. It simply isn't being received as well as SM1. Ignoring enormous amounts of reviews will not change that.
Am I still looking forward to it? Of course! I expect it to be pretty good.

That's completely incorrect and is not at all what I said. Thanks but no thanks for your oversimplification/putting words in my mouth.So top critics being the most respected professionals should be ignored because their numbers are too low.
and the masses (users) should be ignored because they're not professional.
![]()
RT it's just as bad as IGN. their reviews aren't worth web fluid
That's not saying much. Web fluid aint cheap ya know.RT it's just as bad as IGN. their reviews aren't worth web fluid