Guess What?! They're rebooting THE MUMMY!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joel Goodsen beats all those other names, because Tom made Risky Business before he became a $cieno. Still his best role, too.

"Please Joel, do what they say! Just get off the babysitter!"

Oh yes, Risky Business is a classic and one of his best. That scene when Rebecca De Mornay first shows up at his house... Good Lord. And you can't beat the Tangerine Dream music.
 
Sliding across the floor in his socks and underwear, just saying.

And as for Crowe, well I really liked him as Jor-el in MOS, so I don't mind him playing science-based characters. And he did play John Nash (RIP) in A Beautiful Mind as well. The serum I think just strips Jekyll of his inhibitions and brings out his darker side.
 
Oh yes, Risky Business is a classic and one of his best. That scene when Rebecca De Mornay first shows up at his house... Good Lord. And you can't beat the Tangerine Dream music.

They sequenced my favorite section of Force Majeure for Lana's arrival. One of the best-ever marriages of music and images in any film. :hmr:
 
Crowe as Jekyll seems good at first thought because he's a great actor, but it doesn't really fit. Jekyll shouldn't be this strong, masculine guy. He's a pretty simple scientific dude whose worst comes out when he's Hyde. Crowe as Jekyll looks like he doesn't need Hyde to **** someone up. Him getting into a fist fight with Cruise is pretty stupid. How modern. Dr. Jekyll can fight! It's feels like something Zack Snyder would do. Sure you can argue he's been taking the serum, but it feels silly.

You're putting too much thought into this film, Doc.

Untitled_zpslyrzirtx.jpg
 
I wonder if Crowe or Cruise's character will end up being the Mummy when it's all said and done?
 
First one is definitely not happening given they're introducing Crowe's Jekyll in this film.

Second theory might be plausible.
 
I think that his character might be connected to The Mummy in some way. But I doubt that he actually becomes one himself.
 
http://www.cinemablend.com/news/1597170/the-big-change-the-mummy-had-to-make-because-of-x-men-days-of-future-past

There was a moment when I had sort of rendered a design that I liked for a male version of The Mummy. And in that version of The Mummy, the Mummy had been born with a skin pigmentation that at the time would have made him really sort of an outcast. And I thought it was an interesting backstory, because it began to tell the story of someone who had been bullied, which I found topical. I was reaching for a way to make the Mummy a character who is relatable, understandable, and that spoke to issues that we're dealing with now.

I was going down that road, and then I saw the end of Days of Future Past. And they had the character that Oscar Isaac wound up playing as a boy, and it was, I kid you not, the exact same design. And I was like, 'Oh, man! That is not good!' And actually it was the catalyst, it was the moment of, 'Okay, not only is this not going to be different enough, Bryan Singer just did it, I definitely don't want to go down that road.' I had had that voice in my head for some time to make it a woman, and that was the moment where, the minute I saw that post-credits scene, I went, 'We have to start over.' I don't want to mess around even remotely with anything that feels familiar or feels like it's been done. I have to go in totally new territory.'
So yeah... the new Mummy is not a Daddy because of Apocalypse.
 
So is Sofia one and done as the Mummy?

Hopefully not but no point in speculating. There's a reason why they cast Boutella, a woman, in the role and it'd be lidicrous just to do a 180 on it.
 
Crowe as Jekyll seems good at first thought because he's a great actor, but it doesn't really fit. Jekyll shouldn't be this strong, masculine guy. He's a pretty simple scientific dude whose worst comes out when he's Hyde. Crowe as Jekyll looks like he doesn't need Hyde to **** someone up. Him getting into a fist fight with Cruise is pretty stupid. How modern. Dr. Jekyll can fight! It's feels like something Zack Snyder would do. Sure you can argue he's been taking the serum, but it feels silly.

Marvel's Bruce Banner is kind of a thicker guy now, too. Crowe certainly wouldn't have been my first or second choice. but i'll wait to see what he does with it. he is a more antagonistic character in this; it seems.
 
I wonder why they are starting off with the Mummy. is it because it's one of the older monsters? doesn't seem like Universal's strongest material.
 
I wonder why they are starting off with the Mummy. is it because it's one of the older monsters? doesn't seem like Universal's strongest material.
I think the Mummy is probably the most popular Universal monster franchise, mainly because the Brendan Fraser films.

They tried to make Dracula and Frankenstein recently and those were flops, so I think that's why they're turning to the Mummy? It's also the story that can have a bigger scope I think. I don't know. I would love to see a GOOD Invisible Man movie though.
 
Last edited:
There's one thing studios are doing wrong these days.

They really need to go back to filmmaker-driven moviemaking.

Put The Mummy or The Invisible Man or whatever in the hands of a great. visionary filmmaker, and he'll probably deliver something breath-taking. Take risks, with an innovative take on the material, and something we haven't experienced on the big screen in a long time.
 
There's one thing studios are doing wrong these days.

They really need to go back to filmmaker-driven moviemaking.

Put The Mummy or The Invisible Man or whatever in the hands of a great. visionary filmmaker, and he'll probably deliver something breath-taking. Take risks, with an innovative take on the material, and something we haven't experienced on the big screen in a long time.

they dont want to take risks. they want what other have. they want marvel formula. 99% of hollywood does
 
There's one thing studios are doing wrong these days.

They really need to go back to filmmaker-driven moviemaking.

Put The Mummy or The Invisible Man or whatever in the hands of a great. visionary filmmaker, and he'll probably deliver something breath-taking. Take risks, with an innovative take on the material, and something we haven't experienced on the big screen in a long time.

Thing is, most if not all of the great visionary filmmakers probably wouldn't give a rat's ass about something like this because they want to make their own original projects.
 
I'm kinda dumbfounded by the number of people online who think this is a remake of Brendan Fraser's mummy movie.
 
That's what happens when the remake is just as memorable as the original.
 
It's not even a remake, it's just a reimagining of the same concept.
 
I really wish this wasn't a world-ending threat. I'd much prefer the mummy to be a smaller scale threat.
 
I have this awful feeling like this will, eventually, be kind of a Suicide Squad ripoff.

Hyde = Joker

Dracula and the Mummy = Enchantress

vs

Frankenstein's Monster (Slipknot), Bride of Frankenstein (Harley), Wolfman (Diablo), Invisible Man (Boomerang), Creature (Killer Croc) = the Squad

Cruise's character = Rick Flag
 
Last edited:
So wait, the plan is to get all of these monsters into one major team up movie or something? Lol
 
Last edited:
I'm kinda dumbfounded by the number of people online who think this is a remake of Brendan Fraser's mummy movie.

I thought it was a remake of the 1959 movie.:o
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"