• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Thursday Aug 14, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST. This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Harry Potter and the Curse Child

Poetic Chaos

Hella fetch.
Joined
Dec 7, 2005
Messages
7,444
Reaction score
3
Points
33
The stage production currently being produced and written by Rowling herself has been confirmed to be a sequel and not a prequel. Will be set 19 years after the last novel. Movie can't be far behind. Should Radcliffe star in the stage production? Thoughts?
 
Dunno how I will be able to stomach hearing Albus Severus or James Sirius or even worse,


Scorpius Malfoy.

Man, as much as I liked the book series, I loathed that damn epilogue
 
It's Cursed* Child.

And yes, it's a sequel.
 
Are parts 1 and 2 the same play or different plays?
 
Wouldn't be surprised if a movie eventually comes from this, even if it's another decade or so away. She seems to be circling it with all the short stories and other in-universe movies etc.
 
This Martha Stewart lady should just write a goddamn book and stop teasing her fans.
 
Trying to picture kids being able to sit through *two* live plays...I suppose they'll do it as a big stage spectacle with lots of special effects to keep their attention, like the Disney shows.
 
Wouldn't be surprised if a movie eventually comes from this, even if it's another decade or so away. She seems to be circling it with all the short stories and other in-universe movies etc.

That sounds kinda inevitable, imo.
 
I am really excited about this. Just hoping Hermione and the rest of the living crew is is in it. I also agree the movie seem inevitable.
 
I'd rather get a book out of this than a movie.
 
It just feels like a more realistic expectation for Rowling to convert this to prose than to get the old gang back together and make a film out of it. Especially considering the ages of the characters.
 
It just feels like a more realistic expectation for Rowling to convert this to prose than to get the old gang back together and make a film out of it. Especially considering the ages of the characters.
My guess is it will be a book.
 
How exactly does that work? How do you see both parts?
 
Back in the early 1980s, the Royal Shakespeare Company put on a play based on a Dickens novel called "The Life and Adventures of Nicholas Nickleby" which was eight and a half hours long and done in two parts. They offered the parts on consecutive evenings or you could see both parts in one day with a dinner break. (Despite the length and the then-unheard-of $100 ticket price when it came to Broadway, the show was a smash hit and sold out its entire run).

I imagine they'll do it the same way here.
 
Back in the early 1980s, the Royal Shakespeare Company put on a play based on a Dickens novel called "The Life and Adventures of Nicholas Nickleby" which was eight and a half hours long and done in two parts. They offered the parts on consecutive evenings or you could see both parts in one day with a dinner break. (Despite the length and the then-unheard-of $100 ticket price when it came to Broadway, the show was a smash hit and sold out its entire run).

I imagine they'll do it the same way here.
you can see both parts in one day .
But you have to pay for them separately ,I THINK its $15 for both plays.
:up:

Looked it up and that is exactly what they are are doing.
 
I think after the Fantastic Beasts movies, we'll get movie adaptations of the two part stage play.
 
Fantastic Beasts is going to be "at least a trilogy", so if the films keep being very successful, they might last much more than just three films, would buy them more time till adaptin cursed child to cinema.
 
I'd rather get a book out of this than a movie.

Yes, a million times.
But still, I feel like she would've just announced the book (if she really wanted to write it). Also, with Fantastic Beasts coming out in 2016, I think we might eventually get a movie based on this.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"