Yeah. The other one is actually a very big tent-pole film with the Rock, a 110 million dollar budget, based on a comic and supposedly R.2 Hercules movies next year?
Yeah. Maybe we will get a better look when the trailer is out.Just looking at the cinematography, it looks more like a TV show than a film.
Nobody in Hollywood has anything on the Rock. But of all the rest of non-Rock actors in Hollywood, this dude is pretty damn jacked.Yawn, this guy has nothing on the Rock
Well this guy is a relative newbie, probably his first leading man role. But The Rock has been a leading man for a decade now and is a proven box office star. So The Rock's film kinda begins in the race in a position of advantage.I wonder will this hamper the Ratner version like OHF did WHD. Assuming people actually care to go see this one.
110 million might a gamble if they do indeed go with an R. Cause the comic that it is based on is absolutely blood soaked. I hope its an R but then again in Hollywoodland, you never know.Doubt this has that big of a budget. While the one by Ratner sounds like it has bigger scope but $110 million seems fairly in control.
Yeah. The other one is actually a very big tent-pole film with the Rock, a 110 million dollar budget, based on a comic and supposedly R.
This one's PG 13.
This one already has a confirmed rating of PG13. It's on their website too.It's the other way 'roundThis will be R, The Rock movie is PG-13
This one already has a confirmed rating of PG13. It's on their website too.
The Rock one might be R mainly because the comic it is based on is drenched in blood.
Scott Adkins is so talented he should be doing mainstream action movies, not direct to DVD.This one has Scott Adkins, so I'm pretty much obligated to see it.