What is that from?
I'm not sure if bud actually did show any remorse. He may have had empathy as you said but he also shot her in the chest with a shotgun.
I honestly think o-ren was a bit of an introvert and a capitalist. She needed bill to get to the top of the yakuza so as far as she was concerned it was all just a job. I get why she isolated herself when you consider the pain of her family and all that.
I don't know, there's just something about the way the bride and vernita almost seem to have a laugh in the kitchen together that implied they used to be friends I reckon. Even the bride at her maximum fury still had a bit of a laugh with her. To be honest I reckon the bride may have even tried to invite vernita to her wedding which is how bill found out about it in the first place.
I... Where is this coming from? Forgive me amigo, but... I just don't see this supposed connection at all. They are actually quite icy, in their dialog with each other. There's no laugh to be had between friends in that scene. Beatrix lays out what is happening in the fullest, with no humor. She tells her it's eye for an eye but that she's not interested in involving Vernita's family, especially her daughter.
As for Bud... Well I did say the Vipers were all cold blooded killers. Bud showed the most remorse of all of them. He told Bill that his betrayal was wrong, that they were getting what was coming to them and it's pretty much intimated that the estrangement between Bill and his brother was based on what went down in that El Paso church... But that empathy didn't mean Bud was gonna lay down and die either. He was just honest with himself about who and what he was and how something he made a choice to do was now coming to bite him on the ass.
You can see what you want but I just don't get any vibe of Vernita and Beatrix having a friendly relationship before the El Paso incident.
I really have never gone over what so many people's problems with Vol. 2 is. I love it as much as part one. It indeed is slower in pacing and is more about learning about character history, but I loved all that stuff. It's still this mix of Kung Fu and revenge western and still stylish as all hell to me.
What exactly is the criticism people have? I would like to know.
I really have never gone over what so many people's problems with Vol. 2 is. I love it as much as part one. It indeed is slower in pacing and is more about learning about character history, but I loved all that stuff. It's still this mix of Kung Fu and revenge western and still stylish as all hell to me.
What exactly is the criticism people have? I would like to know.
It's slow. It's boring. And that whole scene in Mexico with the Acuna Boys and Michael Parks is so unnecessary that it ruins what little momentum the movie has going into the climax. It sucks the excitement out of a climax that took two movies to build to. I have no idea why that scene was anywhere near the final cut of that film.
And while the scene with Budd and his Wolverine-looking boss was screwing up his work schedule was entertaining, it was completely unnecessary to the story.
So my criticism? The movie has some fat that should have been trimmed. A great writer and director QT may be, not everything he shoots needs to make it to the final edit. This movie shows that more than any of his others.
And don't even get me started on the ending which is really the beginning of years and years of therapy for that poor child.
But I loved the Pi Mei stuff and really enjoyed the scene where Beatrix finds out she's pregnant.
Death Proof is one of my favorite Quentin Tarantino movies, while Pulp Fiction is one of my least favorites.
Also I don't dislike Pulp Fiction, but it couldn't withstand the massive amount of viewings back when it came out. I practically have it memorized and haven't felt the desire to watch it in years.
WT you cut me deep bro .We were on the same page r.e HEAT but with this Pulp Fiction bombshell, how do we move forward?
Tarantino keeps saying he wants' to do a Volume 3 but that looks like it will never happen.