The Joker_1000
Superhero
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2007
- Messages
- 7,832
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
I say a good 45-60 minutes is enough.
Huh, i don't get what you're saying??The Hulk should only be shown when needed, I don't want the film to turn into the Lee version where he was the Hulk every five minutes of the entire film.
Huh, i don't get what you're saying??
Senseless action. Most films, including the new arrival Transformers, have depended on action to tell the story. I want the Hulk to appear only where it's needed, not to completely overtake the story because the producers need an action extravaganza on page fifty-eight.
Ok, that's what i tought about senseless action, but you are saying that Hulk was showing too much in Ang Lee's film???
from that I understand that Ang Lee's Film was senseless action???
And then I'm confused...
The latter part of my sentence was to imply the above. Senseless action extravaganza's. The first part was to point out that the Hulk was in the last half of the film because they needed action to take place when realized that the story was going to far. Being a Hulk fan, I was quite upset by the character and his potrayal.
Just like Leterrier said, it needs to be 50/50. Equally much Hulk as Banner.
There are some issues of the comic where Banner never appears at all. And they aren't all "action extravaganzas". If the director takes your attitude about the Hulk then yeah...don't throw him in there too much. But there is more to him than "Hulk smash!". If they treat him that way, then he will be doomed to be a "special effect" in this one just like he was in Lee's film.Senseless action. Most films, including the new arrival Transformers, have depended on action to tell the story. I want the Hulk to appear only where it's needed, not to completely overtake the story because the producers need an action extravaganza on page fifty-eight.