wobbly said:The fact that the design of the Ultimate Gal-Lak-Tus drones and the concept behind them (an artificial intelligence consuming organic energy to sustain it's technology) is far too reminiscient of the Matrix films is reason enough for me to hope they avoid going down that route. Yeah, it worked fine for the Matrix films, but it's been done, so why invite the criticism of ripping off others when you have in place an alternative superior to that idea anyway?
No, I want them to give us Galactus as a cosmic space god, a terrifying force of nature as old as the universe itself. Sure, they can update the armour, but dont change the fundamental original concept of the character to match it's inferior (and derivative of other sources) ultimate counterpart. This mistake was made with Doom in the first movie, I really really hope they dont make it again.
Abaddon said:I wonder how they'll explain Surfer,and possibly Galactus being able to speak English.
Mistress Gluon said:You DO realize the whole "insect robot alien eating humans and dominating them" thing is FAR older than the Matrix, right? At least as far back as the '50's.
wobbly said:And your point is?
Abaddon said:I wonder how they'll explain Surfer,and possibly Galactus being able to speak English.
celldog said:They can communicate in all languages of any world they arrive. He's a space god. Is it beyond the possibility that he has "some" level of omniscience??
Abaddon said:It's interesting but it's a rather large concept to accept, especially in the world established in the movies.
Mistress Gluon said:Then Matrix is a rip off of that, with the whole robot idea. So why would you call Gah Lak Tus a rip off of the Matrix, when the Matrix itself is a rip off of something else? It would make far more sense to say Gah Lak Tus was a rip off of something else that came decades before the Matrix.
wobbly said:Matrix is the most recent example of the idea on film, and the one you can bet this movies version will be compared to if they go down that route, especially as the design of the gal-lak-tus drones in the books (and that is what Story has hinted he is following) is clearly influenced by those used in the Matrix. Thats why it makes sense: there are specific similarities.
btw- I had thought the point you were getting at was that the whole "insect robot alien eating humans and dominating them" thing predating the matrix as well by decades only emphasises why they shouldn't use it here.
Mistress Gluon said:That's why it would only work as Galactus being a conceptual being. He probably doesn't even really talk, so much as people understand him as talking to them since that's all they can concieve (conceptual!) of Galactus.
celldog said:
Abaddon said:lol,that'd be quite a leap from the first film. I've no doubt they'll dumb it down.
Mistress Gluon said:lol It's pretty advanced even for the comics. Most just understand it as that Galactus just merely appears differently to everybody. Galactus is actually much more closely related to a fourth dimensional concept that has sentient thought, with cosmic psionic powers (which would explain his ability to understand any mind no matter what), and since his form can't actually be viewed normally, his cosmic power that links to their minds (allegedly for the point) would automatically adjust for them into the form most likely for them to understand.
Abaddon said:Question: How would the Nullifer work on a conceptual being?
Mistress Gluon said:It will only be compared by people who think the Matrix is original. Hopefully people are more educated about their own entertainment than to make such a mistake. Graphics and looks wise? I can only see it getting compared if Gah Lak Tus looks like the squids. lol But they're more or less solid bugs with Galactus hats for butts.
Nah. I actually support the Gah Lak Tus, in movies. A giant Galactus wouldn't translate NEARLY as well as Gah Lak Tus.
Which do I LIKE more? Galactus of course. I'm his biggest fangirl if anything. But I'd rather see a well done movie, than one that just kind of rips it out of nowhere.
wobbly said:I disagree. Those front eyes (a rather distinctive feature) are as direct a lift as you can get:
![]()
![]()
Well, agree to disagree time. I think the original concept is the best, can work damn well if handled right, and the one I'd personally rather see.
Abaddon said:It's interesting but it's a rather large concept to accept, especially in the world established in the movies.
wobbly said:I disagree. Those front eyes (a rather distinctive feature) are as direct a lift as you can get:
![]()
![]()
Well, agree to disagree time. I think the original concept is the best, can work damn well if handled right, and the one I'd personally rather see.
most likely telapathy. they won't actually be speaking english to one another but they will believe to do so...Abaddon said:I wonder how they'll explain Surfer,and possibly Galactus being able to speak English.
celldog said:How is that all of a sudden a reach? StarTrek has everyone communicating in the same language. I haven't seen an episode wher they beam down to a new planet and could talk to the natives.
If Spock And Kirk can do it, why not Galactus??
Methinks you are looking for a reason not to do this.
Abaddon said:Star Trek should've come up with Babel fish or something.