The Amazing Spider-Man I don't want the new Spider-Man film to be in 3D

[SpeterMan3]

Is it just me, or is Michael Jackson always relevant in some way?

 

[A&W]

No it is not just you-LOL

 

[Doc Ock]

Is it just me, or is Michael Jackson always relevant in some way?

Maybe, seeing how most of the Spidey fans here seem to have a Michael Jackson avatar!

 

[Marvel Spider]

Maybe, seeing how most of the Spidey fans here seem to have a Michael Jackson avatar!

I haven't noticed.

 

[dark_b]

http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=63364

 

[Ajendo]

Marc Webb meeting up with the 3d team behind avatar caused some premature excitement on my part. I initially thought it was saying that, Webb was meeting with the cgi effects team behind avatar...that would have been sweet.

 

[Dark_Lord]

http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=63364

Great sign that they're talking with the Avatar team. Hopefully they'll tell him that 3D can be used and not be a gimmick.

 

[MrSpyder]

Great sign that they're talking with the Avatar team. Hopefully they'll tell him that 3D can be used and not be a gimmick.

Good point, I assume if they want to have that feel of a 3-D film, it's best to talk to the source

 

[Dark_Lord]

Good point, I assume if they want to have that feel of a 3-D film, it's best to talk to the source

It's also good that they want to shoot the movie in 3D and not just convert it during post production.

 

[FlawlessVictory]

I will never get the b***hing against 3D so as long as a 2D print exists, and the extra money spent on it isn't from your pocket.

Honestly, what is the big deal here? I want to understand.

The problem becomes when writers and directors start really going out of their way with the story/scenes just to make sure something looks "cool" in 3D. It could make the story suffer.

 

[©KAW]

Yeah, that or a Dancing Peter...Singing MJ.

 

[TheSlag]

Yeah, that or a Dancing Peter...Singing MJ.

LOL. True. OR.. those BIG HONKIN "GweMJ" lips that they centered in on in the preview for SM2, where she leaned in for the kiss at the cafe scene.

LOL.. I could of only "imagined" *shudders* that in 3D. t:

 

[©KAW]

Marc Webb meeting up with the 3d team behind avatar caused some premature excitement on my part. I initially thought it was saying that, Webb was meeting with the cgi effects team behind avatar...that would have been sweet.

I'm trying to convince Sony now to let WETA handle the CGI/VFX, they keep putting me on hold. But do not worry, I shall be victorious.

 

[©KAW]

LOL. True. OR.. those BIG HONKIN "GweMJ" lips that they centered in on in the preview for SM2, where she leaned in for the kiss at the cafe scene.

LOL.. I could of only "imagined" *shudders* that in 3D. t:

Yeah, they have to be careful, but at least they're talking to the right people. Actually, the best people for the job.

 

[Scarlet Spider]

I'm trying to convince Sony now to let WETA handle the CGI/VFX, they keep putting me on hold. But do not worry, I shall be victorious.

As much as I'd love to see it, it'll never happen. Sony already has their own effects company. The chances of them not using Sony Imageworks and contracting another company are slim-to-none.

Fantastic news on Webb meeting with Cameron though. Hopefully, he'll use the 3-D format correctly and get the most out of it. Spidey's definitely a great franchise for it.

 

[DACMAN]

I will never get the b***hing against 3D so as long as a 2D print exists, and the extra money spent on it isn't from your pocket.

Honestly, what is the big deal here? I want to understand.

No kidding. What does it matter as long as they can see it in 2D? It's freaken weird. Some people act like they're the ones putting up the money for this movie.

Besides, people who are against 3D are probably the same people that were against DVD's going to high def. And it's not that far off to think they would have been against movies and tv going to color. It's called progress.

 

[DACMAN]

Marc Webb meeting up with the 3d team behind avatar caused some premature excitement on my part. I initially thought it was saying that, Webb was meeting with the cgi effects team behind avatar...that would have been sweet.

I thought the same thing. But you never know. Maybe their people will talk to his people and something might happen. We can dream.

Man I'm looking forward to this movie.

 

[©KAW]

As much as I'd love to see it, it'll never happen. Sony already has their own effects company. The chances of them not using Sony Imageworks and contracting another company are slim-to-none.

Fantastic news on Webb meeting with Cameron though. Hopefully, he'll use the 3-D format correctly and get the most out of it. Spidey's definitely a great franchise for it.

Yeah, they have their own VFX company, but it's broken, and it makes Spider-Man look like he's a WET CLAY figure.

Sony Imageworks looks as if the company is filled with film students learning how to become VFX artists. And they're practicing on the Spider-Man movies.

When I get them on the phone what should I say...?

 

[conan69]

IMHO 3D sucks

 

[Kahoot]

What sucks about 3D?

 

[A&W]

The problem becomes when writers and directors start really going out of their way with the story/scenes just to make sure something looks "cool" in 3D. It could make the story suffer.

I truly believe that the appropiate way to do a movie in 3d is to do it exactly as you would in 2d but instead use a 3d camera. figure out all the action and camera angles and storyboard pictures without even having the 3d in mind.

The main thing the 3d has to offer is that it feels more realistic, because it feels like it's right there. It makes the CGI action scenes look cooler simply, because objects look more real when they have 3d depth as opposed to looking flat like a piece of paper.

But we don't need something popping out of the screen just, because we can. 3d should be used only for the sake of realism.

 

[A&W]

Maybe, seeing how most of the Spidey fans here seem to have a Michael Jackson avatar!

Michael Jackson rules!

 

[A&W]

It's also good that they want to shoot the movie in 3D and not just convert it during post production.

Like Alice in Wonderland which looks horrible and is probably going to turn audiences off 3D.

I wonder if theatre chains should refuse to show converted movies

 

[RustyCage]

So what if 3D's unnecessary? What harm does it do? I swear, people on here look for ANYTHING to be ridiculously radical about.

 

[eledoremassis02]

3D usually creates cheesy angles..