I need to shut this woman up

[Kaleb]

This lady wrote a small column in the local magazine saying why does Iran and Korea have to have a nuclear programme when America and Isreal doesnt, she then goes on saying that it was America who used the nuke on a country last and not Korea or Iran , she is cleary an Anti American, what I want to do is rebuttle that arguement she made so she looks stupid.

 

[Mee]

Mail her a giant copy of the O RLY owl.

 

[Obi-Ron]

what I want to do is rebuttle that arguement she made so she looks stupid.

OK, good luck with that.

 

[Kaleb]

basically she was responding to an article on North Korea dictator .

 

[Riven]

OK, good luck with that.

He'll need it.

 

[Immortalfire]

Mail her a giant copy of the O RLY owl.

 

[Mee]

It worked to get rid of that bird at my window.

 

[Immortalfire]

It worked to get rid of that bird at my window.

Oh, I remember that senario. Glad it worked

 

[RogueLDN]

This lady wrote a small column in the local magazine saying why does Iran and Korea have to have a nuclear programme when America and Isreal doesnt, she then goes on saying that it was America who used the nuke on a country last and not Korea or Iran , she is cleary an Anti American, what I want to do is rebuttle that arguement she made so she looks stupid.

so what if she is anti american, i thought it was the land of the free, free speech abound. Deal with it

 

[bulok]

yeah but you don't like the country? get the **** out :P


and yes I am an immigrant and i really do share that sentiment. it's not hard moving country. Go move to Iran or N. Korea *****

 

[RogueLDN]

^
You are a muppet.

 

[Frizzo the Clown]

Isn't calling someone anti-American going a bit far?

 

[jaguarr]

Isn't calling someone anti-American going a bit far?

Why do you hate America so much, Frizzo?

jag

 

[Riven]

Isn't calling someone anti-American going a bit far?

Yeah, but it's also easy...

 

[Mr Sparkle]

^
You are a muppet.

why do you hate Muppets?

 

[Mr Sparkle]

This lady wrote a small column in the local magazine saying why does Iran and Korea have to have a nuclear programme when America and Isreal doesnt, she then goes on saying that it was America who used the nuke on a country last and not Korea or Iran , she is cleary an Anti American, what I want to do is rebuttle that arguement she made so she looks stupid.

you mean pointing out facts is "anti-american" good to know

It kinda sorta explains a whole lot.

 

[Maxwell Smart]

Look boys and girls, THIS is what we call a platitude:

This lady wrote a small column in the local magazine saying why does Iran and Korea have to have a nuclear programme when America and Isreal doesnt, she then goes on saying that it was America who used the nuke on a country last and not Korea or Iran , she is cleary an Anti American, what I want to do is rebuttle that arguement she made so she looks stupid.

Its designed to look like a genuine thought, but don't be fooled, it isn't.

 

[AnimeJune]

This lady wrote a small column in the local magazine saying why does Iran and Korea have to have a nuclear programme when America and Isreal doesnt, she then goes on saying that it was America who used the nuke on a country last and not Korea or Iran , she is cleary an Anti American, what I want to do is rebuttle that arguement she made so she looks stupid.

Sweet chocolate Jesus!
GrammarBatGirl says: YOU FAIL.
GrammarBatGirl translation: "This woman authored a small article in a local magazine regarding the unfairness of Iran and Korea needing a nuclear program when America and Israel do not.

She went on to remind readers that America was the last nation to rely on the nuclear bomb, and not Korea nor Iran. I believe she is clearly anti-American. What I would most desire would be to refute her argument in a manner that reveals the inferiority of her intelligence."

FIRST OF ALL - learn English. It doesn't matter how good your argument is, if it's expressed in faulty language. Allow me to provide you with an example: "OMG Bushs socila securty pogram sux balz!!1!!1!" Did that help the argument any? NO.

SECOND OF ALL - the point of an argument is to provide YOUR point, NOT to make the other person look stupid. If you go after people with the intention of making them look like idiots, then you're going to fail. Just make a good argument, and her supposed "stupidity" will make itself evident. Since this woman was writing for a magazine, I'm only assuming she took the time to make her argument concise and well-written. It is your responsibility to do the same if you wish to refute it.

 

[Mee]

Sweet chocolate Jesus!
GrammarBatGirl says: YOU FAIL.
GrammarBatGirl translation:"This woman authored a small article in a local magazine regarding the unfairness of Iran and Korea needing a nuclear program when America and Israel do not.

She went on to remind readers that America was the last nation to rely on the nuclear bomb, and not Korea nor Iran. I believe she is clearly anti-American. What I would most desire would be to refute her argument in a manner that reveals the inferiority of her intelligence."

FIRST OF ALL - learn English. It doesn't matter how good your argument is, if it's expressed in faulty language. Allow me to provide you with an example: "OMG Bushs socila securty pogram sux balz!!1!!1!" Did that help the argument any? NO.

SECOND OF ALL - the point of an argument is to provide YOUR point, NOT to make the other person look stupid. If you go after people with the intention of making them look like idiots, then you're going to fail. Just make a good argument, and her supposed "stupidity" will make itself evident. Since this woman was writing for a magazine, I'm only assuming she took the time to make her argument concise and well-written. It is your responsibility to do the same if you wish to refute it.

You're anti-American.

 

[Corinthian™]

Sweet chocolate Jesus!
GrammarBatGirl says: YOU FAIL.
GrammarBatGirl translation: "This woman authored a small article in a local magazine regarding the unfairness of Iran and Korea needing a nuclear program when America and Israel do not.

She went on to remind readers that America was the last nation to rely on the nuclear bomb, and not Korea nor Iran. I believe she is clearly anti-American. What I would most desire would be to refute her argument in a manner that reveals the inferiority of her intelligence."

FIRST OF ALL - learn English. It doesn't matter how good your argument is, if it's expressed in faulty language. Allow me to provide you with an example: "OMG Bushs socila securty pogram sux balz!!1!!1!" Did that help the argument any? NO.

SECOND OF ALL - the point of an argument is to provide YOUR point, NOT to make the other person look stupid. If you go after people with the intention of making them look like idiots, then you're going to fail. Just make a good argument, and her supposed "stupidity" will make itself evident. Since this woman was writing for a magazine, I'm only assuming she took the time to make her argument concise and well-written. It is your responsibility to do the same if you wish to refute it.

Spider-asshat says: Shut the **** up, newbie

 

[Maxwell Smart]

the point of an argument is to provide YOUR point, NOT to make the other person look stupid. If you go after people with the intention of making them look like idiots, then you're going to fail.

Especially when you're infact an idiot yourself.

He created this thread to tell us about how he's planning to make this woman who writes well enough to have her articles published look stupid and in the process makes himself look stupid with horrid grammar.. while talking about how much more intelligent he is than her.

Oh, the unintentional hilarity.

 

[Obi-Ron]

Sweet chocolate Jesus!
GrammarBatGirl says: YOU FAIL.
GrammarBatGirl translation: "This woman authored a small article in a local magazine regarding the unfairness of Iran and Korea needing a nuclear program when America and Israel do not.

She went on to remind readers that America was the last nation to rely on the nuclear bomb, and not Korea nor Iran. I believe she is clearly anti-American. What I would most desire would be to refute her argument in a manner that reveals the inferiority of her intelligence."

FIRST OF ALL - learn English. It doesn't matter how good your argument is, if it's expressed in faulty language. Allow me to provide you with an example: "OMG Bushs socila securty pogram sux balz!!1!!1!" Did that help the argument any? NO.

SECOND OF ALL - the point of an argument is to provide YOUR point, NOT to make the other person look stupid. If you go after people with the intention of making them look like idiots, then you're going to fail. Just make a good argument, and her supposed "stupidity" will make itself evident. Since this woman was writing for a magazine, I'm only assuming she took the time to make her argument concise and well-written. It is your responsibility to do the same if you wish to refute it.

You had me at "sweet chocolate Jesus."

 

[Mr Sparkle]

"OMG Bushs socila securty pogram sux balz!!1!!1!"

But, Bush's social surity program does Indeed "suck balls"

 

[AnimeJune]

Mee: I'm Canadian, so that doesn't mean much.

Corinthian(tm): Since I've posted regularly here since May (to a total of 1600+ posts), I believe our definitions of "newbie" must be different. Care to elaborate your version?

Maxwell Smart: I'm confused by your post - are you agreeing with me or calling me an idiot?

Mr. Sparkle: Yes, but is there a better way to express it just how badly the metaphorical balls are sucked by Bush's social security program?

 

[JLBats]

The wolf's eyes have found their prize,
And you have found your plaaaace in it all...