• Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version.

Racist double standard?

Man-Thing

Avenger
Joined
Apr 27, 2003
Messages
10,118
Reaction score
0
Points
31
I thought this is an interesting commentary written by Larry Elder. There does seem to be a double standard by the media regarding racist comments/group affiliations of political people to the advantage of Democrats. Anyway, any politician that says something racist should be made ashamed of it by his/her constituates through the hands of the media. Sadly that doesn't happen as much if you are a Democrat.

Virginia's Senator Allen suffers from double standard on racism
By Larry Elder

Senator George Allen [R-VA] seemed a lock for reelection. That is, before the "stunning" revelation that, as a college student in the 1970s, he used the "N" word.


Allen, in addition, stands accused of racial insensitivity because he recently used the term "macaca." Here's the story. Shekar Ramanuja Sidarth, who works for Allen's opponent, followed and filmed Allen during the senator's campaign stops. Sidarth's parents came from India, but he was born in Fairfax County, Virginia. At a campaign rally, Allen pointed to the man and said, "Let's give a welcome to Macaca here. Welcome to America and the real world of Virginia." Apparently, some consider the term "macaca" — which can mean "monkey" — a racial slur. Allen publicly and privately apologized, personally calling the young man to express his remorse.


Let's play who's-the-racist-and-what-is-the-statute-of-limitations.


Consider the allegations that Allen's Democratic opponent, Jim Webb, also used the "N" word. According to former acquaintance Dan Cragg, while a freshman from 1963 to 1964 at University of Southern California, Webb used to drive through Watts, a predominantly black area of Los Angeles, pointing rifles and shouting the "N" word at blacks. Moreover, Webb, a published novelist, liberally uses the "N" word in his work. Examples: "They want stupid n*ggers, they'd all pay to see a dumb*ss n*gger." — "Fields of Fire," p. 302. "Don't know why I crave watermelon the way I have over the past few weeks. Jimmy says I must have a n*gger in the woodpile." — "A Country Such As This," p. 34.


What about the man known as the "conscience of the Senate," Senator Robert Byrd [D-WVA]? He belonged to the Klan during the 1940s, where he served as a "Kleagle" — a Klan recruiter. Back then, Byrd referred to American blacks as "race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen from the wilds."


How about then-Arkansas governor Bill Clinton? According to Clinton's bodyguard, Arkansas State Trooper Larry Patterson, Clinton frequently used the "N" word, using it to describe Reverend Jesse Jackson, as well as a local black civil rights leader. Said Patterson, "When [Bill Clinton] had black political leaders in the state and he disagreed with them, he would frequently use the 'N' word."


What about former First Lady and current Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton [D-NY]? She allegedly called Clinton's congressional campaign adviser, who failed to secure her then-boyfriend's 1974 election to Congress, a "f***ing Jew bastard." Not only did Paul Fray — the target — go public, so did his wife, as well as campaign aide and businessman Neil McDonald.


What about more recent examples of "racial insensitivity"? The then-First Lady, in 1996, gave a speech on behalf of an organization called "EMILY's List." EMILY stands for Early Money Is Like Yeast. In her speech, Hillary mocked black then-mayor Willie Brown, who, according to Clinton, did not know this "person" called "Emily" and asked to be introduced to her. First Lady Clinton, according to the Los Angeles Times, used a "mock African-American accent" to imitate Brown, saying, "She's supportin' all these people. She's supportin' Senator Dianne Feinstein. She's supported Senator Barbara Boxer. ... She supported everybody. Why won't she support me?"


What about the alleged racist strategy employed by now-Senator Chuck Schumer [D-NY]? In 1974, Jay Homnick, then 16 years old, says he attended a meeting in the Flatbush area of New York. Schumer, a newly minted Harvard grad running for State Assembly, was introduced to the audience consisting of local white, Italian, Jewish and Slavic immigrants. They wanted to rid three city blocks of Avenue K apartments whose tenants were almost 100 percent black. Schumer, according to Homnick, suggested a way to eradicate this infestation from the community.


Schumer told the group that, if elected, he planned to propose legislation to "help" the poor blacks by designating their buildings as being in need of extensive facelifts. With the residents "temporarily" relocated in government housing, the apartments would be renovated and sold as condos. The original tenants would be offered the right to purchase the new condos, wrote Homnick, but "we could be sure that — ha, ha, ha — the blacks would not be able to raise the cash required, which would not be inconsiderable."


What about the current congressional candidacy of Keith Ellison, running in Minnesota's 5th district? In 1990, Ellison, then a member of the Nation of Islam and a law student at the University of Minnesota, wrote an article for the school's newspaper defending NOI's Minister Louis Farrakhan against charges of racism. Farrakhan has called Judaism a "gutter religion," pronounced Adolf Hitler "wickedly great," claimed that whites are the devil, condemned gays, and, on their website, his organization still calls for a separate region in America so that blacks may relocate and live there. Ellison now denounces Farrakhan's views and says back then he failed to "adequately scrutinize" the minister's positions.


Moral to the story, anti-Semitism and anti-black rhetoric counts against you — unless, of course, you're a Democrat.

scource

What say you?
 
I THINK THAT IS A GOOD FIND, AND THE MORE YOU THINK ABOUT IT. IT'S KIND OF TRUE :o

I FIND IT MORE DISGUSTING THOUGH THAT THE DEMOCRATS TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE VOTES THEY GET FROM AFRICAN-AMERICANS AND OTHERS.
 
Hey Hippie, I think you would like Larry Elder. I suggest his books "Showdown" and "The ten things you can't say in America", and also his movie "Michael and Me".
 
i actually just discussed this with a fellow classmate today!!!
weird.
i, being a democrat stated that i think everyone is racist, but just too afraid to say it out loud.
and he, being a republican, feels that at LEAST republicans are honest in their discriminations and not so caught up in Political Correctness.
i honestly don't think that ANYONE can say that they are not in the least slightly racist. even if it's just giving into stereotypes, that's a form of racism.
i think that if republicans are going to get in trouble for it, so should they all, Democrats included. they're running this ****ing country. you can't go around just calling the people you represent whatever the hell you want and then expect us to believe you have our best interests in mind. none of them! unless they want to be fair and refer to everyone by their derogatory names. then at least i would feel that they're being fair. but that's just me.
 
heypapajinx said:
i actually just discussed this with a fellow classmate today!!!
weird.
i, being a democrat stated that i think everyone is racist, but just too afraid to say it out loud.
and he, being a republican, feels that at LEAST republicans are honest in their discriminations and not so caught up in Political Correctness.
i honestly don't think that ANYONE can say that they are not in the least slightly racist. even if it's just giving into stereotypes, that's a form of racism.
i think that if republicans are going to get in trouble for it, so should they all, Democrats included. they're running this ****ing country. you can't go around just calling the people you represent whatever the hell you want and then expect us to believe you have our best interests in mind. none of them! unless they want to be fair and refer to everyone by their derogatory names. then at least i would feel that they're being fair. but that's just me.

NOW, I MAY LAUGH AT A RACIST JOKE EVERY NOW AND THEN, I AM NOT RACIST IN ANY SHAPE OR FORM. I THINK THAT OTHERS ARE SO ALSO. I BELEIVE IN THE EQUALITY FOR EVERYONE REGARDLESS OF SKIN COLOR. I AM EVEN OPPOSED TO AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, WHICH I SEE AS GOVERNMENT SPONSORED REVERSE RACISM. I AM OPPOSED TO POLITICAL CORRECTNESS.

ALSO, BEING A DEMOCRAT HAS NO EFFECT ON HOW YOU INTERPRET SOMEONE BEING A RACIST :o
 
everyone in d.c is racist..

i find it odd that 40 years after the civil rights act, there in only one african american in the senate and he's not even all black, he's milatto.

and you'd be suprised just how bad racisim still is. this country is so socially segregated which is sad.
 
gap5ewl said:
everyone in d.c is racist..

i find it odd that 40 years after the civil rights act, there in only one african american in the senate and he's not even all black, he's milatto.

and you'd be suprised just how bad racisim still is. this country is so socially segregated which is sad.

THOSE HAVE TO DO WITH THE ECONOMIC CONDITIONS OF AFRICAN-AMERICANS, NOT THE HATRED OF AFRICAN-AMERICANS :o

ALSO SOCIAL SEGREGATION IS WORSE IN PLACES LIKE EUROPE. THE RIOTS IN FRANCE, ITALY FEARED THAT SIMILAR RIOTS WOULD TAKE PLACE, RUSSIANS IN THE UKRAINE, THE ROMA IN ROMANIA, ETC.
 
hippie_hunter said:
THOSE HAVE TO DO WITH THE ECONOMIC CONDITIONS OF AFRICAN-AMERICANS, NOT THE HATRED OF AFRICAN-AMERICANS :o

ALSO SOCIAL SEGREGATION IS WORSE IN PLACES LIKE EUROPE. THE RIOTS IN FRANCE, ITALY FEARED THAT SIMILAR RIOTS WOULD TAKE PLACE, RUSSIANS IN THE UKRAINE, THE ROMA IN ROMANIA, ETC.
yeah publically its bad there but if you really think of it, this place is pretty segregated. Just go to a school, blacks mostly always hang out with..blacks, whites usually hang out with..whites, ect. I mean its like we all live on a different spectrum..
 
gap5ewl said:
yeah publically its bad there but if you really think of it, this place is pretty segregated. Just go to a school, blacks mostly always hang out with..blacks, whites usually hang out with..whites, ect. I mean its like we all live on a different spectrum..

RACISM IS THE HATRED OF OTHER RACES THAT ARE NOT YOU'RE OWN. HANGING OUT WITH MOSTLY BLACK PEOPLE OR MOSTLY WHITE PEOPLE IS NOT RACIST. :o

IT'S TABOO. PEOPLE OF ONE ETHNICITY TEND TO ASSOCIATE WITH PEOPLE OF THEIR OWN ETHNICITY. HENCE WHY LITTLE ITALY, CHINATOWN, HARLEM, SPANISH HARLEM, ETC. HAVE BEEN CREATED.
 
hippie_hunter said:
NOW, I MAY LAUGH AT A RACIST JOKE EVERY NOW AND THEN, I AM NOT RACIST IN ANY SHAPE OR FORM. I THINK THAT OTHERS ARE SO ALSO. I BELEIVE IN THE EQUALITY FOR EVERYONE REGARDLESS OF SKIN COLOR. I AM EVEN OPPOSED TO AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, WHICH I SEE AS GOVERNMENT SPONSORED REVERSE RACISM. I AM OPPOSED TO POLITICAL CORRECTNESS.

ALSO, BEING A DEMOCRAT HAS NO EFFECT ON HOW YOU INTERPRET SOMEONE BEING A RACIST :o
i wasn't stating my political preference to say that it has anything to do with racism.
i was stating the fact that i believe everyone is racist, no matter if you're democrat or republica, republicans just tend to be less politically correct which makes them seem heartless. i think they're all heartless, the whole lot of 'em.
and with the discussion we had in class today, some people DO consider you a racist if you laugh at a racist joke. just because you say "yeah, that joke was funny but i'm not at ALL racist", other people might not agree. that's what the whole issue is about. other peoples perception.
 
heypapajinx said:
i wasn't stating my political preference to say that it has anything to do with racism.
i was stating the fact that i believe everyone is racist, no matter if you're democrat or republica, republicans just tend to be less politically correct which makes them seem heartless. i think they're all heartless, the whole lot of 'em.
and with the discussion we had in class today, some people DO consider you a racist if you laugh at a racist joke. just because you say "yeah, that joke was funny but i'm not at ALL racist", other people might not agree. that's what the whole issue is about. other peoples perception.

OH, I SEE WHAT YOU MEAN, I JUST READ WHAT YOU SAID WRONG.

AND HOW IS LAUGHING AT A RACIST JOKE BEING RACIST ITSELF. I DARE YOU TO WATCH CLERKS 2 AND NOT LAUGH WHEN DANTE AND RANDAL WERE ARGUING ON WHAT WAS A RACIAL SLUR.
 
hippie_hunter said:
RACISM IS THE HATRED OF OTHER RACES THAT ARE NOT YOU'RE OWN. HANGING OUT WITH MOSTLY BLACK PEOPLE OR MOSTLY WHITE PEOPLE IS NOT RACIST. :o

IT'S TABOO. PEOPLE OF ONE ETHNICITY TEND TO ASSOCIATE WITH PEOPLE OF THEIR OWN ETHNICITY. HENCE WHY LITTLE ITALY, CHINATOWN, HARLEM, SPANISH HARLEM, ETC. HAVE BEEN CREATED.
... i didn't say it was racism i said it was social segregation.
 
Man-Thing said:
I thought this is an interesting commentary written by Larry Elder. There does seem to be a double standard by the media regarding racist comments/group affiliations of political people to the advantage of Democrats. Anyway, any politician that says something racist should be made ashamed of it by his/her constituates through the hands of the media. Sadly that doesn't happen as much if you are a Democrat.



scource

What say you?
Bunch of cracka-ass-crackas.
 
first off that guy used to be a republican. he goes back and forth one year to the next from being democrat to republican. He actually voted for Bush. what kind of democrat votes for Bush?

secondly. I doubt he was pointing guns at people calling them nigors. when you've done things like that, you tend to not run for office, because you know it would be all over the news.

thridly, this is not a legitimate news source. you have to realize there are sites like this all over the internet. you can find sites that look equally professional, that claim Osama bin laden and George Bush have business deals.

Websites that people have heard of tend to be forced into being more honest for fear of getting sued.
 
If I can be serious this time, I'd like to bring a little perspective into this thread...

Don't you partisan ass-hats have anything better to do than try to pander to racial minorities by pointing out racist acts by those of the opposing political party? Is that how you garner your support? By saying the other side is as bad as you, or potentially worse? The Democrats criticize Republicans by calling them racist, so you reply by pointing out racist Democrats? Don't you have freaking platforms you should be standing on?

What happened to giving the people something to believe in? What happened to telling people what you and your party can do for this country, as opposed to simply pointing out the faults of the competition? My God, what happened to standards?

Cut the "we're the lesser of two evils" bull****, and strive to be f***ing good.

All of you.
 
Spider-Bite said:
first off that guy used to be a republican. he goes back and forth one year to the next from being democrat to republican. He actually voted for Bush. what kind of democrat votes for Bush?

secondly. I doubt he was pointing guns at people calling them nigors. when you've done things like that, you tend to not run for office, because you know it would be all over the news.

thridly, this is not a legitimate news source. you have to realize there are sites like this all over the internet. you can find sites that look equally professional, that claim Osama bin laden and George Bush have business deals.

Websites that people have heard of tend to be forced into being more honest for fear of getting sued.
and yet hardly nothing was said of Robert Byrd saying "I have known many white Nig ers". Not to mention his klan days.

He backs up what has been documented by other news sources (citing the NY Times) and points out things like "such and such said this"...
 
Manic said:
If I can be serious this time, I'd like to bring a little perspective into this thread...

Don't you partisan ass-hats have anything better to do than try to pander to racial minorities by pointing out racist acts by those of the opposing political party? Is that how you garner your support? By saying the other side is as bad as you, or potentially worse? The Democrats criticize Republicans by calling them racist, so you reply by pointing out racist Democrats? Don't you have freaking platforms you should be standing on?

What happened to giving the people something to believe in? What happened to telling people what you and your party can do for this country, as opposed to simply pointing out the faults of the competition? My God, what happened to standards?

Cut the "we're the lesser of two evils" bull****, and strive to be f***ing good.

All of you.

I think both parties are full of crooks and cheats, I'm not even gonna vote for either in my Senate race for my state.

The fact is the intentions of the thread are to point out discrepencies BY THE MEDIA by not reporting both sides! Not to point out who said what.

Surley any fair and self thinking person would WANT that. Wouldn't you agree?
 
Man-Thing said:
I think both parties are full of crooks and cheats, I'm not even gonna vote for either in my Senate race for my state.

The fact is the intentions of the thread are to point out discrepencies BY THE MEDIA by not reporting both sides! Not to point out who said what.

Surley any fair and self thinking person would WANT that. Wouldn't you agree?
Yeah, sure. I just want everyone to know that both sides are full of it. That includes the politicians, and people on the Hype! who can turn anything into a Left-vs-Right topic.
 
hippie_hunter said:
OH, I SEE WHAT YOU MEAN, I JUST READ WHAT YOU SAID WRONG.

AND HOW IS LAUGHING AT A RACIST JOKE BEING RACIST ITSELF. I DARE YOU TO WATCH CLERKS 2 AND NOT LAUGH WHEN DANTE AND RANDAL WERE ARGUING ON WHAT WAS A RACIAL SLUR.


Is your caps lock button broken hh?
 
I'm kinda currious of what the bigger liberals on the board think of this...?
 
tomahawk53 said:
I'm kinda currious of what the bigger liberals on the board think of this...?

Notice that they're not saying anything? That's what they think. Read my signature ;).
 
Spider-Bite said:
first off that guy used to be a republican. he goes back and forth one year to the next from being democrat to republican. He actually voted for Bush. what kind of democrat votes for Bush?

secondly. I doubt he was pointing guns at people calling them nigors. when you've done things like that, you tend to not run for office, because you know it would be all over the news.

thridly, this is not a legitimate news source. you have to realize there are sites like this all over the internet. you can find sites that look equally professional, that claim Osama bin laden and George Bush have business deals.

Websites that people have heard of tend to be forced into being more honest for fear of getting sued.

AND YET STORIES SUCH AS BUSH BEING BEHIND 9-11 IS BELEIVEABLE (NOT SAYING THAT YOU BELEIVE THAT), I THINK THAT MANY LIBERALS TEND TO HAVE A DOUBLE STANDARD. THE "EVIL" CONSERVATIVES GET AND HAVE TO BE EXPOSED, YET THE "GOOD" LIBERALS ARE INCAPABLE OF SUCH.

ALSO THAT IS NOT A NEWS STORY, IT IS AN EDITORIAL.
 
tomahawk53 said:
I'm kinda currious of what the bigger liberals on the board think of this...?
I think Republicans by their nature are whiners.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"