X-Maniac
Storm In A Teacup
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2003
- Messages
- 15,210
- Reaction score
- 631
- Points
- 103
Sometimes I wonder if you're blindly defending Ratner or do you even read any of his interview?
He had clearly stated in interviews that he had read thru Vaughn's full script, found the white house assault cringe-worthy and moved the bridge scene from the middle to the finale.
And what was his logic for doing so - not due to time but because of a visually stunning scene which he had to put in the end so nobody will miss it but in the process sacrificing the story and any epicness the movie could have been as well as creating logic problems with the over-actions and inactivities of both Magneto and the Phoenix respectively.
X, I agree that the production was rushed but not to the point that he couldn't do scenes he wanted to do, considering he had over 20 deleted scenes in his dvd, most of which were alternate takes/conclusion to the same scene and he had even time to do a extra end-of-the credit scene that was not in the script.
After learning that Ratner was the one who cut the relationship between Xavier and Juggernaut from another thread, I shudder to think what other significant characterisations he had left in the cutting board in exchange for all his mindless & unnecessary actions....I would really love to read Vaughn's full script before Ratner dumbified it.
Was it disappointing that you'd be doing a movie like this but you wouldn't be able to shepherd it because it was developed by another director?
Ratner: It really wasn't developed by another director. I think Matthew Vaughn came on very late, too. He was only on for a few weeks, also. It takes years to develop something, really. They started developing this right after "X2," so it wasn't really... I don't really hear much in the media about who did what. At the end of the day, I directed the movie, so that's what I care about.
Dialogue, too? Did you have the writers there on set?
Ratner: I had the writers there. The story never changed, that's what I loved about it. I completely changed the third act, but not the story. The story was there. It was just the location changed, because the third act was ending in Washington, DC. I said to the studio that these movies always end in Washington, DC. I've seen it so many times. (SPOILERS) And the thing that they did is that they had this incredible set piece, which is this bridge sequence, but it was in the middle of the movie. Originally, there wasn't that truck sequence with the prisoners? They were on Alcatraz Island, that was a prison, and Magneto came to the prison to break them out of the prison and used the bridge to get them off the island. So I said, "This is crazy!" This is the biggest set piece in the entire world, that I've ever read, and it's in the middle of a movie. We have to move this to the end and make it part of the plot. Breaking them out is just one part of it, but where are you going to go from there? So I convinced Tom Rothman, the head of the studio, to move it to the end of the movie and put the Cure on Alcatraz Island and put a face on The Cure with the little boy, and have the reason they're bringing that bridge over is that it just connects the dots even better, I think.
So what was the biggest scene you shot to fit your own sense... that's different from the previous two films? What will people who know your work as a director see as distinctively something of yours?
Ratner: I don't think it's a shot. I don't think it's something like Spike Lee with the shot of the guy floating down the street. (laughter) I think it's more of an energy. If you watch the other movies and you watch this movie, I think this movie has a pace that's my kind of ADD frenetic... I get bored very easily so... next scene, next scene, next scene, keep it moving, keep it moving, keep it moving... I mean, did you fall asleep at all in the film or no? A few times?
(SPOILERS) The after credit sequence in this film... is that something that was in the script? Do you know the whole time that you want to put that after the credits?
Ratner: Yeah, the studio didn't even know I did it until.. I didn't even put it on the schedule. I shot in between set-ups, just went over there and shot it, and then I showed it to the studio and they went "Oh My God, we love that!" because it keeps Xavier. Look, in the last one, Jean Grey died and then I saw her on the first day of shooting X3, so nobody dies in these movies? What the hell are they talking about?
All of which is interesting but I really can't believe that time and money were not a factor in the changes made to the story. An epic battle in Washington --- which could hardly be a studio set --- would be costly and time-consuming.
If you believe everything that people say, then perhaps you really do believe Janet Jackson's tit being flashed to the world really was a 'wardrobe function.' I don't know what was funnier - her tit being revealed, the lies about it being a wardrobe malfunction, or the moral crisis and national meltdown it caused across the USA!



Why didn't the government immediately prepare for the possibility of a massive attack on Alcatraz? In the final battle it is overwhelmingly obvious that the government was not prepared for an attack.
t: 
