Because thread manager kills polls as soon as the thread rolls over.
Yep. I'm trying to fix it now.
Like I said, trust me. We Panther fans know Cam is our franchise QB. Afterall, this is the guy who singlehanded took an entire mid-level program to the BCS national championship, and won, and broke Peyton Manning's records in the NCAA and NFL.
Surround him with talent, and he'll give you a Superbowl. We could have gone 11-5 last year had our defense and special teams not been dreadful.
What's annoying is my local theater seems to put the 2D show of the same movie on a smaller screen. When I saw TA, they had two massive screens in 3D and one tiny screen in 2D. So that's how I was forced to see it. Annoying as hell knowing that I was able to see something like Inception on a much larger screen because 3D wasn't even a factor with that movie.
Come on. Thats really flimsy at best and you know it. That's really trying to stretch there. Watch Jeremy Jahns new spoiler vid on it. It explains what I think perfectly.
It a plot that makes sense for all intents and purposes. Just not the one we were promised from the first trailer, or at least the expectations that it suggested for the story. That's all. If the lore didn't exist, the story would have been perfectly fine.

go Browns! #TrentRichardson2013
Great RB right there!
Good luck later this year. Ya deserve a winning season.![]()

Don't agree with that at all. This had almost no serious moments in it...even the moments that should have been serious (in conventional movies) was sprinkled with humor in them.
Just got home from the theater. Loved every minute of it except forthe "clean slate" protocol and the removal of the arc reactor. It takes the weight behind Tony's description of it as a "terrible privilege" away...not to mention the shrapnel being removable discounts half of Iron Man 2's plot.
Also, I can't express how much I ****ing hate 3D. I have a stigmatism in my right eye so my depth perception is abysmal, so even when I have 3D glassess on I can't see the 3D and the hit just ends up looking dark and somewhat blurry. So I have to wear my glasses with the 3D glassess they give me in order to watch the movie in 3D. That feels uncomfortable as ****. And it also ****ing hurts my head and makes my eyes burn when watching the movie. And on top of all that, the theaters will not offer the movie in only IMAX, you HAVE to watch it in 3D IMAX or you're stuck with the small crappy screen.
tl;dr **** these studios. I hate how you have to be a perfect person to enjoy **** these days.
Just got back home, and ... Well ... I enjoyed the HELL out of this movie. It was a Shane Black movie through and through, which isn't a bad thing in my opinion!
Concerning The Mandarin:
[BLACKOUT]This twist will divide fanboys, and I can see it being debated for years to come. I can see why it isn't one's cup of tea. I acknowledge that. In the context of the movie, though, it worked for me ... And in the end, we actually did get The Mandarin, in his dragon tattooed glory. Killian himself professed that he was indeed The Mandarin, so it wasn't just a "fake" character.
Did I want 10 magical rings? Well, I'll admit that I wouldn't complain at all about getting a 100% accurate adaptation from the comics, but I can see why they didn't go that route. The Iron Man movie trilogy has been about science: Science being used for good vs. science being used for evil. The magical stuff is saved for the Thor movies, which works for me in the MCU. You take all of the different elements from each of the Marvel solo movies and mesh them together for The Avengers films. At least that's how I see it. Disagree with me as you wish.[/BLACKOUT]
Is Iron Man 3 better than The Avengers? Well, no. The Avengers is an extremely difficult act to follow, and I think Iron Man 3 managed to do that very well.
Is Iron Man 3 better than Iron Man 2? You betcha. Iron Man 2 is a very fun movie, but it's a movie that can be easily topped, and Iron Man 3 did that quite easily, in my opinion.
Is Iron Man 3 better than Iron Man 1? Right now, I'm going to say yes and no, leaning more towards no. That doesn't mean this movie isn't any good though! I quite loved it, but I may prefer the first one still. I will say this though: The finale in Iron Man 3 tops the finale in the first movie by a mile, without a doubt.
All in all, I give this movie about an 8.5/10 for now. This movie is a mashup of Iron Man, Lethal Weapon, and Kiss Kiss Bang Bang, which suited my fancies just fine. MCU: Phase Two is off to a really good start. Bring on Thor!
Oh yeah, and Iron Man is the best superhero trilogy to date in my eyes. I can easily say that now.![]()
God I hope so.. I mean one of my 3 teams have to be good eventually right? ..but then again my dad's never seen a city team championship haha
Biggest laugh at my show too. And basically every time he snapped at the kid...which was, you know, every time he talked to him.![]()
Among some posters sure, same thing happens on every board as you mentioned. Clearly the Foreign reviewers are more keen to this than the US.
People find that funny still ? It's like he can't talk to people without doing some lame pun every 10 seconds. I can see why Cap wanted to kick his ass on the Helicarrier.
Saw it, liked it. It's definitely the kind of movie whose pros outweigh its cons.
Pros: Tony- Every scene RDJ's in is the best in the film, with hisbeing a highlight. We see him be a genius on the run, be mentally weak and flawed, and just be a straight-up badass."attack" on "Mandarin's" mansion
The action- While it wasn't as action-heavy as Avengers (I wasn't expecting it to be), the action was intense in all the right places. They were exciting and longer than what the first two had to offer.
The music- Brian Tyler's score was intense, and for once in an IM film, he had a theme I was humming when I left the theater.
The suits- Brief as their appearance might've been, the armors were awesome. That Heartbreaker armor was glorious.
The cons: The ending- No, not the, I'm talking about the end of the final battle.removal of the shrapnelHow many movies is it going to take for Marvel to realize that the best way to end a fight between two characters that have been going head to head and have hated each other for an entire movie, is to have the hero defeat the villain. Not the girlfriend, or the best friend. Iron Man has to be the one to take Iron Monger out, not Pepper. Tony Stark should defeat Whiplash, not Rhodey. Now, again, they made the same mistake. I can understand why people might find this to be a nitpick, but come on! Why not have the guy who's been going through hell finally pull it together and put an end to the threat? Same problem with TDKR, except here, he actually could've done something about it. I'm sorry, but I was so let down with that.
Rhodes- Cheadle was great, so this isn't really a complain on him or his character. I was just left wondering where the hell that really nice War Machine Mark 2 was. It was such a nice suit to not include in the film!
Overall, 8/10. Tony's character was extremely well-written. The wholeseemed sorta disrespectful at first, but, whenMandarin twist, I totally forgave it honestly. Having Mandarin look like that instead of his original "look" in the film was forgivable in my eyes.Aldrich comes out with those dragon tattoos and his sick powers
Come on. Thats really flimsy at best and you know it. That's really trying to stretch there. Watch Jeremy Jahns new spoiler vid on it. It explains what I think perfectly.
It a plot that makes sense for all intents and purposes. Just not the one we were promised from the first trailer, or at least the expectations that it suggested for the story. That's all. If the lore didn't exist, the story would have been perfectly fine.
Is it fixable? or do you have to restart the poll?
People find that funny still ? It's like he can't talk to people without doing some lame pun every 10 seconds. I can see why Cap wanted to kick his ass on the Helicarrier.