Is Goku just a Peter Parker rip off in this film?

:huh: Ok I guess it's ok to start making spam threads. BRB with one of mine.
 
those ugly forehead veins are an it. and they have more screentime then chatwin.
 
:huh: Ok I guess it's ok to start making spam threads. BRB with one of mine.

Its not a spam thread, how is this a spam thread? Is anything you don't like a spam a thread?

Its a legit question, Goku acts more like Parker then he does anime Goku in this movie, Goku was never awkward high school student that's what Peter Parker, is completely legit point. Anime Goku was never like that.

This movie more or stole a lot from the spider-Man movies, Goku acts like Peter Parker, Chi-Chi is the high school sweat heart he pines after (MJ) and Fuller is the bully who torments him (Flash Thompson).

They might as well give Piccolo a Goblin gilder and have him throw pumpkins at Goku. :whatever:
 
There's a blatant parallel. Unfortunate, really. The origin could have been more original, but I guess adhering to cliches and conventions is all the writers could think of.
 
The script of Ramsey is old, 2002 I think. there are similarities with Spiderman, But Goku has his power from the beginning, The origin should have been more original, is the writer fault.(Ramsey-Wong)
 
yes it is, goku will be intelligent, a photographer, and shoot ki blasts from his wrist......
 
Yeah, Goku is a third-rate Peter Parker in this movie. While watching the movie, that was the first thing that came to mind.
 
what exactly does third rate peter parker mean?
 
Its not a spam thread, how is this a spam thread? Is anything you don't like a spam a thread?

Its a legit question, Goku acts more like Parker then he does anime Goku in this movie, Goku was never awkward high school student that's what Peter Parker, is completely legit point. Anime Goku was never like that.

This movie more or stole a lot from the spider-Man movies, Goku acts like Peter Parker, Chi-Chi is the high school sweat heart he pines after (MJ) and Fuller is the bully who torments him (Flash Thompson).

They might as well give Piccolo a Goblin gilder and have him throw pumpkins at Goku. :whatever:

Ok I'm back from work. Listen, I'm THE king of spam threads on superherohype, ok. So I'm an expert on what is or is not a spam thread. This qualifies squarely because it's first of all just a sentence long. That's the base of a spam thread. The next qualifying characteristic is how the general atmosphere surrounding the board is regarding the topic of discussion. Since most people here are bashing the hell out of the movie, posting "is it a ripoff of xyz" to my eyes comes off as a obvious attempt to bash it. Hell, maybe I'm wrong, but I've done it for years myself, so I know what it's all about. That's all.

As for the question you posited. Yeah maybe.
 
Ok I'm back from work. Listen, I'm THE king of spam threads on superherohype, ok. So I'm an expert on what is or is not a spam thread. This qualifies squarely because it's first of all just a sentence long. That's the base of a spam thread. The next qualifying characteristic is how the general atmosphere surrounding the board is regarding the topic of discussion. Since most people here are bashing the hell out of the movie, posting "is it a ripoff of xyz" to my eyes comes off as a obvious attempt to bash it. Hell, maybe I'm wrong, but I've done it for years myself, so I know what it's all about. That's all.

As for the question you posited. Yeah maybe.

Its not spam if it relates to the subject matter genius, get that through your head. This is a legit question about the movie, therefore its not spam. Spam would be starting a thread to sell people insurance on this board, that would spam because it has nothing to do with the subject matter. This what spam is genius: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spam_(electronic)

Besides if you are starting "spam" threads, who are you to criticize others?
 
Yes he is. The film completely rips off Spider-man but does not have the charm or wit to pull it off
 
Yep in DBE he is a PP rip off, simply put this version was not Goku (At least not the Goku we all know).
 
Its not spam if it relates to the subject matter genius, get that through your head. This is a legit question about the movie, therefore its not spam. Spam would be starting a thread to sell people insurance on this board, that would spam because it has nothing to do with the subject matter. This what spam is genius: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spam_(electronic)

Besides if you are starting "spam" threads, who are you to criticize others?

I honestly don't know who I am. I'm just here sitting around chillin at my laptop, not doing much.

Ok legit quetion, carry on then. I grant you permission.
 
A SM1 rip-off, it has appeared to be since the first script reports and trailers. The movie lacks all originality and is a clear-cut case of boring Fox formula-pummeling. Soon though Fox will be churning out their TDK photocopies too.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"