Is Super-Heroism Possible?

[donaldthe3rd]

Its alright to like fly to work or super run to school, but not robbing a bank or criminal like stuff.

 

[Enriquespy]

YOu Steal My point to THe NExT PagE!!!!!

 

[atreestump]

personally I could care less people might find offensive if you think I am talking about rapeing someone then you are just as messed up as you think I am. I tried to avoid getting grotesque as much as possible Enriquespy but some people had to assume that I was talking about rape. But even so there is a path that non of these Dudley Do-Rights seem to be able to see. I don't care who you are what part of town you came from if you were faced with the opportunity to rob a bank and get off scot free there is no way in hell anyone would pass it up. I'm sorry it is human nature and if you say you wouldn't do it you are either a liar or insanely nieve.

 

[Enriquespy]

so... you have a master on human nature?

Know what?...
lets get over it, I don wanna be traped on argumentations.

I thrust in human Nature Cause I Am a Human. That´s all Im gonna say

ANyone devoted can do Amasing things for Mankind, Superheroes or not, it has hapenned before and will happen again If not there woudnt be so many holidays

 

[The Question]

personally I could care less people might find offensive if you think I am talking about rapeing someone then you are just as messed up as you think I am. I tried to avoid getting grotesque as much as possible Enriquespy but some people had to assume that I was talking about rape. But even so there is a path that non of these Dudley Do-Rights seem to be able to see. I don't care who you are what part of town you came from if you were faced with the opportunity to rob a bank and get off scot free there is no way in hell anyone would pass it up. I'm sorry it is human nature and if you say you wouldn't do it you are either a liar or insanely nieve.

I'm neither. There is a way in hell that someone would pass up that opourtunity, as some people would pass up that opourtunity. Alot of people have the power to do some nasty **** and get away with it, but don't because they're either morally opposed to it or just don't think of it.

 

[donaldthe3rd]

Not everyone in the world is so corrupt that they would kill off the guy who annoys them if they could get away with it, or steal from someone if they knew they could get away with it. People do have a mind of their own and wherther or not they choose to do the right thing is their choice.

 

[atreestump]

all valid points and yes maybe when others are watching people with Special talents and abilities use it for good but who is to say that they always do the right thing look at Micheal jordan for instance he uses his fame and money to get with any girl he wants. look at the countless sports players that get away with murder just because they can play a sport well. do you see what I am getting at?

 

[donaldthe3rd]

Some what but not really. Yes fame does have to some some degree an influence on a celebrity if they have commited a crime but not so great an influence that they get off scott free.

 

[LouFerignoDemon]

This is sort of out of context. A few famous people get away with things, and the majority don't.

Rich people rarely get away with anything, just a few.

And how many freaking sports players have reportedly killed someone?

 

[atreestump]

well i didn't wanna say this but there is O J simpson

and then there was kobe
http://crime.about.com/od/current/a/kobe.htm

 

[The Question]

all valid points and yes maybe when others are watching people with Special talents and abilities use it for good but who is to say that they always do the right thing look at Micheal jordan for instance he uses his fame and money to get with any girl he wants. look at the countless sports players that get away with murder just because they can play a sport well. do you see what I am getting at?

It's not countless. OJ's the only sports player that got away with murder that I can think of. And he didn't get off because he plays football. He got off because he hired a bunch of amazing lawyers.

I'm sorry, but your arguement is very flimsy.

 

[atreestump]

I think your a little flimsy. he only got those lawyers because he played sports. He got one good lawyer that wasn't even that well known until the OJ case. Just because you can't think of any others doesn't mean they don't exist. Two members of the Bucs got away with raping a striper a few months ago. My argument is very strong your just to stubborn to admit I am right.

 

[atreestump]

Not everyone in the world is so corrupt that they would kill off the guy who annoys them if they could get away with it, or steal from someone if they knew they could get away with it. People do have a mind of their own and wherther or not they choose to do the right thing is their choice.

So you are telling me that if I were to leave a thousand dollars on a table somewhere and I walked away from it (hypothetically speaking) that you wouldn't take it? because that is what you are telling me

 

[donaldthe3rd]

Ok bud calm down now. Your going completley off topic here. I opened this thread to find info and to see different peoples thoughts and feelings about super-heroism, not to see the some immature person who surprisingly can read but doesnt know what the hell is being said. And I didnt say that at all, i said THAT NOT EVERYONE IS THAT CORRUPT THAT THEY WOULD DO SOMETHING THAT WAS WRONG AND NOT THINK ABOUT THE CONSEQUENCES. Before you even reply to this make sure you can understand the english language and have no problem being wrong.

 

[donaldthe3rd]

Ok bud calm down now. Your going completley off topic here. I opened this thread to find info and to see different peoples thoughts and feelings about super-heroism, not to see the some immature person who surprisingly can read but doesnt know what the hell is being said. And I didnt say that at all, i said THAT NOT EVERYONE IS THAT CORRUPT THAT THEY WOULD DO SOMETHING THAT WAS WRONG AND NOT THINK ABOUT THE CONSEQUENCES. Before you even reply to this make sure you can understand the english language and have no problem being wrong.

 

[donaldthe3rd]

Ok bud calm down now. Your going completley off topic here. I opened this thread to find info and to see different peoples thoughts and feelings about super-heroism, not to see the some immature person who surprisingly can read but doesnt know what the hell is being said. And I didnt say that at all, i said THAT NOT EVERYONE IS THAT CORRUPT THAT THEY WOULD DO SOMETHING THAT WAS WRONG AND NOT THINK ABOUT THE CONSEQUENCES. Before you even reply to this make sure you can understand the english language and have no problem being wrong.

 

[atreestump]

OIC I understand the English language very well. You need help understanding a thing or two like Not contridicting yourself. If you opened this thread to get peoples opinions then that is what you are going to get. an opinion can't be wrong that is why it's an opinion. Another thing you are telling me you won't rob a bank or sleep with your neighbors wife But you would take a thousand dollars that is laying on a bench that YOU saw someone leave behind. Now maybe and I mean just maybe I am wrong but there doesn't seem to be a desernable difference to me. It seems to me like you are the one that is wrong. wrong for posting the same message three times. Wrong for not following through with your own beliefs, and wrong for crossing words with me

 

[LouFerignoDemon]

well i didn't wanna say this but there is O J simpson

and then there was kobe
http://crime.about.com/od/current/a/kobe.htm

And....?

See, the funny thing about differences from circumstancial situations and strong arguments are these little things I love to call called technicalities. Any class B intelligence can utilize these technicalities (pretty much ANY lawyer).

Let's see. Little evidence, character drawings, and all sorts of negative media towards her.... Geez, I just can't see how they couldn't convict him. It must be because he's a sports star.

I think your a little flimsy. he only got those lawyers because he played sports. He got one good lawyer that wasn't even that well known until the OJ case. Just because you can't think of any others doesn't mean they don't exist. Two members of the Bucs got away with raping a striper a few months ago. My argument is very strong your just to stubborn to admit I am right.

Care to site just what happened with the two Bucs members, or you just going to stand there with all your teeth in your face?

I'm going to go with Question here. Your argument is extremely flimsy, out of context, lacking of information, totally unobservant of anybody put probably yourself and a few family members, and obviously biased based on that. I don't know why, and to tell the truth, I really don't care to know why.

OIC I understand the English language very well. You need help understanding a thing or two like Not contridicting yourself. If you opened this thread to get peoples opinions then that is what you are going to get. an opinion can't be wrong that is why it's an opinion. Another thing you are telling me you won't rob a bank or sleep with your neighbors wife But you would take a thousand dollars that is laying on a bench that YOU saw someone leave behind. Now maybe and I mean just maybe I am wrong but there doesn't seem to be a desernable difference to me. It seems to me like you are the one that is wrong. wrong for posting the same message three times. Wrong for not following through with your own beliefs, and wrong for crossing words with me[/quote]


First off. Opinions can be wrong.

Your opinion is that people are totally corrupt. My father's opinion is that everybody but upper class French are total ******s hardly capable of tying their shoes, and barely capable of making him money. Celldog's opinion is absolutely racially driven. Jplaya's opinion is that Goku can beat everybody. The truth of opinions are, they're only as smart as the bearer of said opinion.

Next.

Now, if you're ever going to accuse some higher intellectual poster on this entire forum of being too stubborn to admit anybody but they are right, it better be me. Because Question definitely doesn't just argue to argue. And this is where the whole "totally unobservant" part comes into play, and it's really not your fault. Question backs down when he's proven wrong, or when he has no basis to be correct, and assumes he cannot prove just what it is he's saying. He has, on far more than one occassion, taken the info of someone TOTALLY new around here because it basically filled in a gap he didn't see before. But like I said, it's not your fault, I don't expect you to go around looking at every single person's posts with detail. However, if you're GOING to make accusations like this, you better at least do some research. If I were to argue with him about, let's say, magic, he and I would go for a page of the limits/non limits of things, and he'd then say, "Good points in all, but we truly don't know, and so we can't argue, so let's agree to disagree." Where I would want to keep going. He's truly a civil poster here, where I'm far less civil, and far less willing to accept crap as I see it.

So here's where I get to the point. You want to know my opinion about you? My opinion is that you're by far shallow, not very observant, and hardly capable of crossing words with Question over a matter he probably has side thought quite a bit, and has a vast amount of knowledge and trivial data just flowing through his head at any given time.

You wish to see a mistake though? Cross words with me. Because if you do, you had better hope to whoever it is you believe in that you pull off an argument so massively overwhelming that a conceptual thinking mind like my own with vast resources of knowledge and argumentative ability to pull on cannot even hope to compare. But if you continue as you have so far, you won't get to it. Instead, you will be in the situation you believe Donald to be in, with me bearing down on you. And I promise you, I am one of the most relentless argumentalists quite possibly in existance. I will argue anything, anywhere, at any time until I'm bored with it. And then, when I am, I will absolutely crush it with an overflowing amount of logic and examples. You've pulled off a few samples, just a few. And given them extremely out of context situations. And while I've been sitting here patiently for Question to eventually talk sense into you, I've had quite enough.

Your turn, if you really wish to step into the doors of a hell you can't possibly win.

 

[donaldthe3rd]

WELL DONE MISTRESS GLUON!!t: t: BRAVO!!

 

[The Question]

And....?

See, the funny thing about differences from circumstancial situations and strong arguments are these little things I love to call called technicalities. Any class B intelligence can utilize these technicalities (pretty much ANY lawyer).

Let's see. Little evidence, character drawings, and all sorts of negative media towards her.... Geez, I just can't see how they couldn't convict him. It must be because he's a sports star.

Care to site just what happened with the two Bucs members, or you just going to stand there with all your teeth in your face?

I'm going to go with Question here. Your argument is extremely flimsy, out of context, lacking of information, totally unobservant of anybody put probably yourself and a few family members, and obviously biased based on that. I don't know why, and to tell the truth, I really don't care to know why.

First off. Opinions can be wrong.

Your opinion is that people are totally corrupt. My father's opinion is that everybody but upper class French are total ******s hardly capable of tying their shoes, and barely capable of making him money. Celldog's opinion is absolutely racially driven. Jplaya's opinion is that Goku can beat everybody. The truth of opinions are, they're only as smart as the bearer of said opinion.

Next.

Now, if you're ever going to accuse some higher intellectual poster on this entire forum of being too stubborn to admit anybody but they are right, it better be me. Because Question definitely doesn't just argue to argue. And this is where the whole "totally unobservant" part comes into play, and it's really not your fault. Question backs down when he's proven wrong, or when he has no basis to be correct, and assumes he cannot prove just what it is he's saying. He has, on far more than one occassion, taken the info of someone TOTALLY new around here because it basically filled in a gap he didn't see before. But like I said, it's not your fault, I don't expect you to go around looking at every single person's posts with detail. However, if you're GOING to make accusations like this, you better at least do some research. If I were to argue with him about, let's say, magic, he and I would go for a page of the limits/non limits of things, and he'd then say, "Good points in all, but we truly don't know, and so we can't argue, so let's agree to disagree." Where I would want to keep going. He's truly a civil poster here, where I'm far less civil, and far less willing to accept crap as I see it.

So here's where I get to the point. You want to know my opinion about you? My opinion is that you're by far shallow, not very observant, and hardly capable of crossing words with Question over a matter he probably has side thought quite a bit, and has a vast amount of knowledge and trivial data just flowing through his head at any given time.

You wish to see a mistake though? Cross words with me. Because if you do, you had better hope to whoever it is you believe in that you pull off an argument so massively overwhelming that a conceptual thinking mind like my own with vast resources of knowledge and argumentative ability to pull on cannot even hope to compare. But if you continue as you have so far, you won't get to it. Instead, you will be in the situation you believe Donald to be in, with me bearing down on you. And I promise you, I am one of the most relentless argumentalists quite possibly in existance. I will argue anything, anywhere, at any time until I'm bored with it. And then, when I am, I will absolutely crush it with an overflowing amount of logic and examples. You've pulled off a few samples, just a few. And given them extremely out of context situations. And while I've been sitting here patiently for Question to eventually talk sense into you, I've had quite enough.

Your turn, if you really wish to step into the doors of a hell you can't possibly win.

Wow.



You know, if internet relationships weren't as profoundly creepy and pathetic as they are, I might venture to say that I'm in love.



Also, since you mentioned magic: No, I don't want to argue this again, but I suggest picking up Alan Moore's "Promethia." It deals with alot of the stuff I talked about in our debates, but it goes much more in depth with them, and naturally, Alan Moore explains it all much better than I do. Hell, I don't even fully understand the whole thing. Plus, it's a romping good yarn in it's own right.

 

[LouFerignoDemon]

Wow.



You know, if internet relationships weren't as profoundly creepy and pathetic as they are, I might venture to say that I'm in love.



Also, since you mentioned magic: No, I don't want to argue this again, but I suggest picking up Alan Moore's "Promethia." It deals with alot of the stuff I talked about in our debates, but it goes much more in depth with them, and naturally, Alan Moore explains it all much better than I do. Hell, I don't even fully understand the whole thing. Plus, it's a romping good yarn in it's own right.

You know me, whether I like someone or don't, I don't enjoy reading this crap that's continuing here for no reason.

And arguing is fun. (But being from France, I have a whole different view on it.)

 

[atreestump]

And....?

See, the funny thing about differences from circumstancial situations and strong arguments are these little things I love to call called technicalities. Any class B intelligence can utilize these technicalities (pretty much ANY lawyer).

Let's see. Little evidence, character drawings, and all sorts of negative media towards her.... Geez, I just can't see how they couldn't convict him. It must be because he's a sports star.

Care to site just what happened with the two Bucs members, or you just going to stand there with all your teeth in your face?

I'm going to go with Question here. Your argument is extremely flimsy, out of context, lacking of information, totally unobservant of anybody put probably yourself and a few family members, and obviously biased based on that. I don't know why, and to tell the truth, I really don't care to know why.

First off. Opinions can be wrong.

Your opinion is that people are totally corrupt. My father's opinion is that everybody but upper class French are total ******s hardly capable of tying their shoes, and barely capable of making him money. Celldog's opinion is absolutely racially driven. Jplaya's opinion is that Goku can beat everybody. The truth of opinions are, they're only as smart as the bearer of said opinion.

Next.

Now, if you're ever going to accuse some higher intellectual poster on this entire forum of being too stubborn to admit anybody but they are right, it better be me. Because Question definitely doesn't just argue to argue. And this is where the whole "totally unobservant" part comes into play, and it's really not your fault. Question backs down when he's proven wrong, or when he has no basis to be correct, and assumes he cannot prove just what it is he's saying. He has, on far more than one occassion, taken the info of someone TOTALLY new around here because it basically filled in a gap he didn't see before. But like I said, it's not your fault, I don't expect you to go around looking at every single person's posts with detail. However, if you're GOING to make accusations like this, you better at least do some research. If I were to argue with him about, let's say, magic, he and I would go for a page of the limits/non limits of things, and he'd then say, "Good points in all, but we truly don't know, and so we can't argue, so let's agree to disagree." Where I would want to keep going. He's truly a civil poster here, where I'm far less civil, and far less willing to accept crap as I see it.

So here's where I get to the point. You want to know my opinion about you? My opinion is that you're by far shallow, not very observant, and hardly capable of crossing words with Question over a matter he probably has side thought quite a bit, and has a vast amount of knowledge and trivial data just flowing through his head at any given time.

You wish to see a mistake though? Cross words with me. Because if you do, you had better hope to whoever it is you believe in that you pull off an argument so massively overwhelming that a conceptual thinking mind like my own with vast resources of knowledge and argumentative ability to pull on cannot even hope to compare. But if you continue as you have so far, you won't get to it. Instead, you will be in the situation you believe Donald to be in, with me bearing down on you. And I promise you, I am one of the most relentless argumentalists quite possibly in existance. I will argue anything, anywhere, at any time until I'm bored with it. And then, when I am, I will absolutely crush it with an overflowing amount of logic and examples. You've pulled off a few samples, just a few. And given them extremely out of context situations. And while I've been sitting here patiently for Question to eventually talk sense into you, I've had quite enough.

Your turn, if you really wish to step into the doors of a hell you can't possibly win.

Wow frenchy that is alot of big words there did daddy help you out with them or did you use a thesaurus for the ones you couldn't spell yourself. let me geuss you gave sexual favors to a bunch of your brothers college buddies to help you out with this long and quit pointless rant right? well I don't expect you to admit it true or not.

Question, donald this has just gone beyond you two so I will no longer be gracing your responses with a response of my own this is my new target and when I am done with her she will be eating dirt with her silver spoon ediquesy of the french ways.

You say I am shallow? and Not observant? for four years of my life I have devoted it to nothing but observation. and I have looked into the minds of others and watched as people pushed others aside just to get to a certain place a few seconds sooner. I have watched YOU use your "awesome" (and I use that word EXTREMELY lightely) ability to argue with a person who already had three people arguing with him. If you were half the person I am you wouldn't be able to stand on the side that i am on taking on the queen of france (which BTW isn't saying much because you know what they say about the french. They tend to start stuff they never intend to finish and they run head on into something and just surrender.)

Even if an opinion can be wrong, it doesn't matter it is still an opinion. and that was the whole point of this thread am I right? of course not you'd never admit that. Now tell me how can a poster have intelect I thought it was just a piece of paper with some kind of image on it. unless of course you are refering to a person who posts bills. Is that the kind of person you are?? do you post bills captain glueon ( Yes I know I misspelled that but hey it gets the point accross)
I think I am going to let you use some of that "Vast knowledge" of yours and let you find out just exactly what happened with the bucs. because i know what I am talking about here. there where quite a few situations where sports players got away with crimes. now is it because they play sports Maybe maybe not. they won't come out and say " O J simpson is hereby found not guilty because he plays sports" No that would be a very poor call and that judge would lose his job so fast it would make his head spin. but does that stop that judge from making up a different excuse such as Insufficient evidence No I say not.

SO you spend your time looking up a new comeback on the internet and I will send out a completely fresh atreestump stomping because I am just that good, I can point out three or four parts where you looked something up frenchy. Now I know I have said frenchy alot and I wanna apologize to you, so here it goes. I am sorry that you are in a counrty so rediculously stuipid that they decided to make red uniforms for there army, back during the 18th century. so they can see eachother threw the smoke of the gunfire. XD what a bunch of Idiots. and if you don't get why that is stuipid then you deserve to be there with them.

Remember this, never ever ever show your enemy your trump card the first bout. There is plenty more where this came from and much more I haven't shown you yet. reply fast I can't wait, and keep this in mind WHAT YOU CALL HELL I CALL HOME!!!!!! So it is better that you do what all french people do best and surrender because I am not going anywhere.

 

[Sun_Down]

I don't care who you are what part of town you came from if you were faced with the opportunity to rob a bank and get off scot free there is no way in hell anyone would pass it up. I'm sorry it is human nature and if you say you wouldn't do it you are either a liar or insanely nieve.

I wouldn't rob a bank, and I'm neither a liar nor "nieve". I'm just a decent person who wouldn't want to ruin the futures of every person whose life savings I'd be taking. Unlike you, I actually think about how my actions impact others and choose not to do certain things I view as wrong. Yeah, I said "choose". There's that whole free will thing that you apparently forgot about.

Your whole argument is based on the assumption that just because a person can do something, they inevitably will. Say I saw a little kid with a $20 bill sticking out of his back pocket. Now, I could knock him out cold and take the money. It'd be easy. He's small, I'm big. Therefore, I have a huge "power" over him. But I wouldn't do that because that's just an awful thing to do. Now, according to your argument, you would beat up this kid and take his money simply because you could? And you'd have no choice in the manner?

 

[LouFerignoDemon]

Wow frenchy that is alot of big words there did daddy help you out with them or did you use a thesaurus for the ones you couldn't spell yourself. let me geuss you gave sexual favors to a bunch of your brothers college buddies to help you out with this long and quit pointless rant right? well I don't expect you to admit it true or not.

Question, donald this has just gone beyond you two so I will no longer be gracing your responses with a response of my own this is my new target and when I am done with her she will be eating dirt with her silver spoon ediquesy of the french ways.

You say I am shallow? and Not observant? for four years of my life I have devoted it to nothing but observation. and I have looked into the minds of others and watched as people pushed others aside just to get to a certain place a few seconds sooner. I have watched YOU use your "awesome" (and I use that word EXTREMELY lightely) ability to argue with a person who already had three people arguing with him. If you were half the person I am you wouldn't be able to stand on the side that i am on taking on the queen of france (which BTW isn't saying much because you know what they say about the french. They tend to start stuff they never intend to finish and they run head on into something and just surrender.)

Even if an opinion can be wrong, it doesn't matter it is still an opinion. and that was the whole point of this thread am I right? of course not you'd never admit that. Now tell me how can a poster have intelect I thought it was just a piece of paper with some kind of image on it. unless of course you are refering to a person who posts bills. Is that the kind of person you are?? do you post bills captain glueon ( Yes I know I misspelled that but hey it gets the point accross)
I think I am going to let you use some of that "Vast knowledge" of yours and let you find out just exactly what happened with the bucs. because i know what I am talking about here. there where quite a few situations where sports players got away with crimes. now is it because they play sports Maybe maybe not. they won't come out and say " O J simpson is hereby found not guilty because he plays sports" No that would be a very poor call and that judge would lose his job so fast it would make his head spin. but does that stop that judge from making up a different excuse such as Insufficient evidence No I say not.

SO you spend your time looking up a new comeback on the internet and I will send out a completely fresh atreestump stomping because I am just that good, I can point out three or four parts where you looked something up frenchy. Now I know I have said frenchy alot and I wanna apologize to you, so here it goes. I am sorry that you are in a counrty so rediculously stuipid that they decided to make red uniforms for there army, back during the 18th century. so they can see eachother threw the smoke of the gunfire. XD what a bunch of Idiots. and if you don't get why that is stuipid then you deserve to be there with them.

Remember this, never ever ever show your enemy your trump card the first bout. There is plenty more where this came from and much more I haven't shown you yet. reply fast I can't wait, and keep this in mind WHAT YOU CALL HELL I CALL HOME!!!!!! So it is better that you do what all french people do best and surrender because I am not going anywhere.

So, let's break it into sections.

First, I was wrong. I know, I know. It happens, not often, but it does. You're not class B, you're class C (I'll explain why here in a little bit).

Or right now. The only thing you had for me was overused generalization stereotypes of the French community as your defense to me? Yawn. Long, dragged out, "where the hell is my Jenga?" yawn. Not even ha, heh, or even wha? And it only serves to stump your statement anyway. (Which I forgot to congradulate you with your handle there. I've never seen one so accurate to the person before.)

Let's go back though. Now, if you mean observant like your mom was some prostitute and your dad was a drunk who raped your drug abusing sister, then yeah, I'd still say you're pretty narrow viewed, but at least would serve the purpose of why your narrow view is that way. So if you spent four years of your life "observing" things, then I fully feel pity that you wasted four years of your life doing it wrong. Because you got into nobodies mind or body (unless by rape, which you seem to condone with power, and you seem to think yourself powerful, though it's more of an overcompensation of insecurity in most obvious fashions).

And let's go back to how your "insults" (Which were more like a mewling to my roar) really just...hurt you. Actually, I don't have to. If that's how you think the French people are (the vastly old stereotype), then you only prove the French's American stereotype, and that you're as dumb as a brick. However, American's aren't really as dumb as bricks, just some of them (i.e. You). They were unoriginal, copied (Oh, and if I copied something, please provide proof), and just...inaccurate. I could go so far as to say, "Like a stereotypical American, you make bark, but no substance, because all you have is bull to fill the ranks with."

But you also went back and corrected your thoughts about opinions. Guess you aren't the almighty ambassador of knowledge, oui? That's left to those of us like Question and myself, who concern ourselves with knowledge, and not petty little biases and unfounded statments without any evidence to support them. Those are best left to the unwashed masses like yourself.

Intelligence is something people have. Some have it in more than the other, case in point, you and I. I have vast amounts of it, and all you have is the flailing, fleeting passings of conciousness.

I also love the streotypical response of "What you call hell, I call home" response. I can almost swear that I wrote out your response myself in what I predicted you to say. And if you really think that's my trump card, you have yet to see me begin.

Oh, and even though you admit to spelling "Gluon" wrong, it's okay. Quantum physics isn't for everybody, you know?

Now, this is where I end it. Because you're not in my league, you're not even in Leaguer's league. And you'd have to get past him, to get Darthphere, to get Dread, to get Question, and THEN on to me. And if really is such the case, I'm wasting my time, quite literally talking to a tree stump.

And you, my friend, have just been Gluowned.

Though, by all means, show me more of how I'm right, I can't wait. I LOVE being right.

 

[LouFerignoDemon]

I wouldn't rob a bank, and I'm neither a liar nor "nieve". I'm just a decent person who wouldn't want to ruin the futures of every person whose life savings I'd be taking. Unlike you, I actually think about how my actions impact others and choose not to do certain things I view as wrong. Yeah, I said "choose". There's that whole free will thing that you apparently forgot about.

Your whole argument is based on the assumption that just because a person can do something, they inevitably will. Say I saw a little kid with a $20 bill sticking out of his back pocket. Now, I could knock him out cold and take the money. It'd be easy. He's small, I'm big. Therefore, I have a huge "power" over him. But I wouldn't do that because that's just an awful thing to do. Now, according to your argument, you would beat up this kid and take his money simply because you could? And you'd have no choice in the manner?

You forgot that you'll rape him.