They need to do him right and just go the Hulk route, all CGI.
Agreed. CGI is the way to go.
The CGI for the Hulk in the Avengers was perfectly fine in my eyes. It looks a lot better than a suit.
Or for that matter, I saw someone somewhere suggest Adam Baldwin. I like it.
![]()
great suggestion he has that rugged handsome look and he is quite the bad assJeffrey Dean Morgan
great suggestion he has that rugged handsome look and he is quite the bad ass
![]()
![]()
No doubt about it. And considering the other three characters aren't exactly cgi-heavy, the biggest focus\efforts should placed be on the Thing.
Yep. However much you might want it, and all-CGI Thing is simply not happening, not at a quality any of you guys would actually want to see.
In a perfect world, they'd get Guillermo Del Toro on the project; nobody can do practical costuming like he does. The Thing would be tougher than Hellboy, true, but I think he'd be up to the challenge of making it both practical and good.
Hulk quality CGI.Agreed. CGI is the way to go.
great suggestion he has that rugged handsome look and he is quite the bad ass
![]()
![]()
what type of ben grim should we get
younger very handsome looking
![]()
or older brute
![]()
They aren't?!?!
Any time the Johnny is the Torch, any time Reed does something "fantastic", etc....
Josh Whedon said they only had two Hulk sequences in THE AVENGERS because that was all they could afford - and that was on a $220 million budget! Is Fox going to put that kind of money into the FF reboot? I doubt it.
You don't even get that much screen time with Iron Man in any IM movie - and those have bigger budgets than any FF film has had. Assuming they do not make the mistake of retelling the origin, the Thing needs to be on screen all the time - that's a tall order for a modest budget film if he's all CGI.