So you discard Glover on the basis of acting talent, even though he "has the look", but you're willing to support Hulme just because he "has the look", any acting talent bedamned?Aethea said:Lachy Hulme rules. I could never take Crispin Glover serious as the Joker. He may look the part, but his voice and acting ability does not fit the Joker's. Besides, He will have bif shoes to fill. Lachy, on the other hand, looks like a tough villain--even without make up.

In the end, it's probably BS.Jett, I've got another name for you that may be in the mix for The Joker - Crispin Glover. Now here's the thing, I don't know where this is coming from. It could be coming from Glover's "people" to get his name out there, or it could be coming from Warners. I know that Glover is sort of a "fan-favorite," so maybe they [Warner Bros. - Jett] is taking that into account. Hell, they cast Christian Bale, didn't they? Thought you would want to know

