redhawk23
Wrestlin'
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2008
- Messages
- 17,137
- Reaction score
- 293
- Points
- 73
lol @ Shyamalan trying to be relevant
His self financed $20m movie made $246m dollars. Shyamalan is doing just fine.
lol @ Shyamalan trying to be relevant
lol @ Shyamalan trying to be relevant
Really? not lazy?
1. What happens to the clone when a real person flies from point A to point B?
2. How do the clones not die of disease or child birth?
3. Why are the tunnels so clean if the experiment is 'abandonded'?
4. Why have Red speculate it was abandoned and not just leave it be without explanation to avoid plot holes?
5. Why would a government just abandon this experiment without getting rid of the clones?
6. Why wasn't the entry to the tunnels guarded?
7. How come this clone was the only one to managed to get out? There was just one power failure in 30 years?
8. Real Adelaide didn't find a way out for 30 years?
9. Why don't the authorities just shoot the clones doing the Hand Across the America thing?
Then you have a whole bunch of people writing weird theories like Jason is a clone even tho it makes no damn sense just because they didn't get the youngest clone was the most feral/most prone to copying. The script is a damn mess
those just off the top of my head. That's about all the time I am willing to spend tying to make sense of this. You have dozens of people online confused not because this is brilliant but because it is filled with gaping holes, inconsistencies and leaps of faith.
These are fair points. But I also feel like people glossed over the plot holes in Get Out. Or perhaps simply the sheer ridiculousness of the idea that one guy and his son could perform brain transplants in their basement without any other help in the surgery. I hate to say it, but that was the point where Get Out kinda jumped the shark for me. The movie really had me up until that point, and then I was like, "Really?" And the common excuse I get from anyone when I bring this up is, "Well, it's a horror movie." Yeah, I get that. But for something that was also a good social commentary, I found this to just be too silly to take seriously. At the very least, I feel it keeps the film from having a "perfect" script like everyone always says it has.
To be clear, I still think Get Out is a really good movie but I was just really disappointed in the ending.
Most of those complaints about it being a “lazy script” are nitpicks that you’d probably find in any movie. If you didn’t like the movie, that’s totally fair, but I don’t think it was lazily written at all.
That’s...one movie out of the millions that have ever been made.
Most of those complaints about it being a “lazy script” are nitpicks that you’d probably find in any movie. If you didn’t like the movie, that’s totally fair, but I don’t think it was lazily written at all.
Am I supposed to list all that are better written?
I think the main problem many people are having is that the movie is neither fully explained nor is it totally unexplained. It stays in a grey area where some things get explained (and even then, just sort of) but some stay abstract and open. There is a semblance of a sci fi concept going on, but also many indications that something supernaturall is at works too.
Funny you mention that since the red outfits look like prison garb.Someone mentioned that the tunnels was suppose to also represent the prison system and now I feel like I need to see it again.