Sure, and you make good points but then you say "it's like a SyFy movie" as oppossed to saying "I found it to be like a SyFy movie" or "I couldn't stand it".
Comparing something we don't like to something that's considerably worse and almost universally seen as "******" is the easiest way to validate one's opinion beyond the thoughts of the rest.
With the exception of the poor characters (and even then, you bring them to the point of biased exageration - you could argue they aren't that far of from the characters of the original) all the other complains you make are extremely subjective. Yet you treat them as facts.
No suspense? A lot have pointed out that I-Rex' escape, its subsequent encounter with the AMC and the encounter with the Gyrosphere are three very suspensful scenes, well-constructed in their use of image and sound that prefer to imply instead of showing everything onscreen. No memorable scenes? Then I must have gone to the wrong third act. Or the wrong finale. No build up to anything? Sure, that mus be why the I-Rex spends the movie almost completely hidden until showing himself to the kids (and is still kept hidden in much more scenes after that). The I-Rex is almost universally considered to be a highlight and yet you call it a glorified T-Rex (admitting that you never liked the concept in the first place doesn't make you more objective) and same with the controlled raptors which are have been generally seen as a potentially-wacky concept but one that was pulled off succesfully. You also ignore every strengh, even in weaker areas (the Apatosaurs scene is a great character moment, for example).
But the thing is, I don't really care about you disliking, even hating, the movie. It's a flawed movie and there are enough flaws for some people to dislike it. At the same time, it's got enough strenghs for people to like it - It depends on whether you like some things more than others, story vs storytelling, logic vs spectacle.
But you act as if it's universally ******. You talk in absolutes, instead of trying to be more moderate. Your signature says that fans acknoledge screw-ups and fanboys make excuses, well, haters make excuses, while someone truly interesting inreviewing a film will be able to see its strenghs (even if they don't embrace them) as opposed to making excuses and comparisions to SyFy.
It's a pet peeve of mine. You've got pet peeves that prevented you from enjoying the movie in a way that wasn't Rifftrax fodder. Well, fine, but that sentence is my pet peeve and I wanted to point out I found it ignorant. Plain and simple.
