1. BVS and SS have the second and third lowest RT audience score out of every DC and Marvel/Sony/Fox movie released in the last 5 years...
2. I have no idea what this means. You know good movies can flop too, right?
3. The audience score for JL is dropping at a faster rate than BVS did, its at 86% and its not been out in the US a full day...
1. Still a passing score. Majority wins. majority>100 RT critics.
2. I know good movies flop too ofcourse. I'm talking mainly about blockbuster and popular movies and big time movie franchises. 98% of the time real bad movies flop hard except for twilight or even TF (if you call it bad). Real bad movies = flop, bad audience scores, no or every few likes from people. So if RT rate a movie as "BAD" but audience score and box office score is not, then its not really bad but actually good or ok enough. All requirements above should agree not just RT scores.
and whats the big deal with RT, their reviews are generic and lame like any casual viewers would say after watching a movie. the way review things their like you and me, normal people. they are normal and not experts if you read the way they review things. so if they are just like you and me, then majority GA>RT people pretending to be experts. these critics are not even detailed and technical (not scoring things such as costume, best batman look ever, acting, music, action, set pieces, best fight scene ever by batman, best superman costume ever, etc) in their reviews but rely more on their feelings and preference about a movie. wow such bias. No wonder SS won oscar for best makeup while RT people doesn't even grade such things and basically grades movie mostly if you have "fun" or entertain by it or not. mcu basic key ingredients no wonder they gets a pass.
Asgard is about to be destroyed but no one cares, who cares, no drama no stakes, thor gets his eye cut, who cares, odin died who cares, but its "comedy fun" so who cares, its still enjoyable so it gets a pass. Asgard was detroyed their whole civilation gone, but it doesnt seem like it, GA reaction = who cares! movie is fun thats all that matters. when it comes to JL this critics nitpicks things such as plot and cgi lol what in the world, have you not seen cgi of thor, loki and odin backdrop before odin died, or cgi spderman and upside down peter parker talking to ned cgi was so bad, why ignore all this in mcu movies specially the mcu plot (who cares plot as long as its fun) and forced and cringed quips and banters in mcu half comedy superhero movies while they nitpick JL quips and cgi and messy plot (so whats the plot in gotg2?) since they dont really have anyting else negative to say.
they make big deal about batvsup fight stop while gamora and nebula tries to kill each other (yeh forgetable no one cares side story) in the most brutal way but a few second suddenly stop because "i want to have a sister or something" what? but who cares right? gotg2 was FUN so it gets a pass while bvs is so serious so you overanalyze it and the moment you can't handle it you automatically say its bad.
Now, they nitpick JL characters are not flesh out even though JL movie tried and successfully squish it in the beginning of the film while gotg who gives a #$#$ about gamora, groot and drax stories as long as it's FUN and its good to go. whats the deal about scarlet witch, black widow, hawkeye, etc who cares as long as its fun
3. as long as its not below 6 then its a passing score and majority likes it. just like batvsup and SS majorities likes them. audience scores proves it, box office score proves it, facebook likes proves it and just like JL is bound to be
Last edited: