Le sigh...

Yeah Gambit in a X-kids movie is bad. Basicly they're telling Gambit to go sit at kids table because they won't let him play with the big boys. You know the actual X-men.
 
Nell2ThaIzzay said:

Because I said so. And you intended this to be a Gambit discussion considering your title. But whatever I am kind of getting sick of my banters with you honestly.
 
mattc said:
I don't know why people are saying that Simon is lying. Someone doesn't *have* to be in a script to go for a casting session. He was considered very early on, I thought that was known, and very early on he was removed because they wanted him to have a bigger role and not feel forced.

IMO people should take this as a good sign, mainly because of what Lauren has said about them wanting more movies. He would be a strong character to bring in and have a lot of focus on. X4, or the X-Kids movie seems likely as people have been guessing.
And when is that going to be? 2009? 2010? 2011? Thats a pretty long wait to swallow. Especially when the likes of Quills, Arclight and Phat are getting screen time in this movie (the third).
 
does anyone get the strange feeling that Multiple Man took over Gambit's part in the movie? like they wanted a cool character with unique powers from the books to put on Magneto's side and they original chose Gambit. soon after revising the script they thought Multiple Man would be a better addition cause they could do more with the character.

perhaps i'm just making **** up? connecting dots that aren't there...
 
newwaveboy87 said:
does anyone get the strange feeling that Multiple Man took over Gambit's part in the movie? like they wanted a cool character with unique powers from the books to put on Magneto's side and they original chose Gambit. soon after revising the script they thought Multiple Man would be a better addition cause they could do more with the character.

perhaps i'm just making **** up? connecting dots that aren't there...
I think the ideas was been toyed with was to have Multiple Man, Gambit, Avalanche and Cannonball as mutants Magneto breaks out. Those were ultimately ditched.
 
I don't buy that they are saving him for future films. He could have been put in X3 somehow. I mean Quill???

They are just 'saving' him to let people sleep at night.
 
Nell2ThaIzzay said:
Why?

This thread is about a Q&A with Lauren Shuler Donner. Gambit was one of a few topics. But there are other topics covered in her Q&A. If you don't like the Gambit talk, feel free to start discussion on one of the other topics that Donner covered.

Here, I'll even start it for you:

Donner thinks that Beast is gonna be more beloved than Angel. See Worthy! I told you Beast > Angel!

;)

Discuss...

This is FAR FROM OVER!! :mad:



:p
 
yeah...so what is the deal with this Quills fellow anyway? is he supposed to be like Spyke from X-men Evolution or something?
 
New X-Men: Academy...ah no wonder i have no idea who he is.
how delightfully obscure a choice!
 
If they put him in as some bit part, in any of the films, Gambit fans would be complaining because his part wasn't big enough. But they obviously couldn't make any of the films center around him because, well that'd be ******ed. So they left him out because they, for some reason, believe he's an important character who deserves more attention, probably starring in a solo flick. Personally, I believe that he only deserves a Nightcrawler-sized role and nothing more, but they might think he's a big enough draw on his own to possibly carry his own movie or something.
 
Neptune said:
Yeah Gambit in a X-kids movie is bad. Basicly they're telling Gambit to go sit at kids table because they won't let him play with the big boys. You know the actual X-men.
Agreed!!!
 
they could use the mutant massacre story line for x-4 and give gabit a nice intro and a pretty big role.
 
RedIsNotBlue said:
Because I said so. And you intended this to be a Gambit discussion considering your title. But whatever I am kind of getting sick of my banters with you honestly.

Pretty much what he said.
 
It's totally clear Gambit will be next new character in the saga, so don't think more about it. and of course, there will be an X4, with Sinister too?...
 
Let's forget what's happened with this trilogy and Gambit, please. If there's a X4, then we'll talk about it again and this time with a reason.
 
sinister as a new villain. that would totally rule. maybe cyce could also get some more screentime then.
 
Nell2ThaIzzay said:
Donner thinks that Beast is gonna be more beloved than Angel.

That's because Beast is like a big teddy bear. Everyone wants to just hug him!

Right?

It's not just me?..
 
No, I need a new teddy bear, too. Beast will be perfect as Jamie's replacement (my old teddy). ;)
 
MoiBijou said:
Let's forget what's happened with this trilogy and Gambit, please. If there's a X4, then we'll talk about it again and this time with a reason.

NO!!! Because according to Nell ANY attempt at another X-Men sequel is going to suck no matter what. :o
 
RedIsNotBlue said:
NO!!! Because according to Nell ANY attempt at another X-Men sequel is going to suck no matter what. :o

Nell has got his ideas that could be correct or not. I don't discuss them. :) Anyway, I think there will be a X4 and if it's well done and Gambit gets a good part, even Nell will be happy. ;)
 
MoiBijou said:
Nell has got his ideas that could be correct or not. I don't discuss them. :) Anyway, I think there will be a X4 and if it's well done and Gambit gets a good part, even Nell will be happy. ;)

You only want X4 just to see Gambit. ;) :p
 
EnSabahNur said:
well didnt we all know gambit wasnt in it?

Well some people just wouldn't accept it, and their dellusions lead to a very big disappointment.
 
Nell2ThaIzzay said:
It's not HIM as Gambit that I'm disappointed I won't see...

It's the fact that Gambit wasn't cut out as early as Kinberg has led us to believe... actors came in to audition for the part!

Gambit was promised to us since before X2, and when we didn't get him there, the promises were that he'd be around the next time. This is the next time, he was in the original drafts, and they even auditioned actors for the part, and they still decided to cut him.

It's just hard to not feel like these guys really don't give a flying **** about the character or his fans, and have no remorse what so ever about leading us on for 3 years, only to just drop him like a bad habit, and expect us to accept their lies because they had no other choice.

:down:(


Which is exactly why I won't PAY to see this movie. Brett RatBastard Simon DingleBerg can kiss my ace, cheat us out of Gambit and I'll cheat you outta profit. And I am not ALONE :batman:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"